WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY INC: Form 990, tax year 2016

View the entire original 990 at ProPublica ↗

Organization
WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY INC (EIN 45-1606079)
Tax period
2016-01-01 to 2016-12-31
Filed
2017-11-06
IRS object ID
201733109349301978
Schema version
2016v3.0
Source
Download XML · Original 990 at ProPublica

Every field in the e-filed return. Faint text is the IRS element name, for citing.

Return header ReturnHeader

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Return2017-11-06T16:58:00-06:00ReturnTs
Tax Period End2016-12-31TaxPeriodEndDt

Preparer Firm PreparerFirmGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Preparer Firm EIN391210538PreparerFirmEIN

Preparer Firm Name PreparerFirmName

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1SCRIBNER COHEN AND COMPANY SC CPASBusinessNameLine1Txt

Preparer US Address PreparerUSAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line1400 EAST MASON STREET SUITE 300AddressLine1Txt
CityMILWAUKEECityNm
State AbbreviationWIStateAbbreviationCd
ZIP53202ZIPCd
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Return Type990ReturnTypeCd
Tax Period Begin2016-01-01TaxPeriodBeginDt

Filer Filer

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
EIN451606079EIN

Business Name BusinessName

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW &BusinessNameLine1Txt
Business Name Line2LIBERTY INCBusinessNameLine2Txt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name ControlWISCBusinessNameControlTxt
Phone4147279455PhoneNum

US Address USAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line11139 E KNAPP STREETAddressLine1Txt
CityMILWAUKEECityNm
State AbbreviationWIStateAbbreviationCd
ZIP532022828ZIPCd

Business Officer BusinessOfficerGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
PersonRICHARD M ESENBERGPersonNm
Person TitlePRESIDENTPersonTitleTxt
Phone4147279455PhoneNum
Signature2017-11-02SignatureDt
Discuss With Paid PreparerYes (1)DiscussWithPaidPreparerInd

Preparer Person PreparerPersonGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Preparer PersonKELLY K MILLER CPAPreparerPersonNm
PTINP00562808PTIN
Phone4142711700PhoneNum
Preparation2017-11-02PreparationDt

Filing Security Information FilingSecurityInformation

IP Address IPAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
I Pv4 Address67.52.13.242IPv4AddressTxt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
IP2017-11-02IPDt
IP Tm13:46:30IPTm
IP TimezoneCDIPTimezoneCd
Filing License TypePFilingLicenseTypeCd
At Submission Creation Device IdAFE4494545C901308C86F8F361740AD43D5E113FAtSubmissionCreationDeviceId
At Submission Filing Device Id7579473D681FFD27003B9408F5391A1F7CE3D632AtSubmissionFilingDeviceId
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Tax2016TaxYr
Build TS2021-01-29 14:40:06ZBuildTS

Form 990 IRS990

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Principal OfficerRICHARD M ESENBERGPrincipalOfficerNm

US Address USAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line11139 E KNAPP STREETAddressLine1Txt
CityMILWAUKEECityNm
State AbbreviationWIStateAbbreviationCd
ZIP532022828ZIPCd
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Gross Receipts$1,401,915GrossReceiptsAmt
Group Return For Affiliates0GroupReturnForAffiliatesInd
Organization501c3Yes (X)Organization501c3Ind
Website AddressWWW.WILL-LAW.ORGWebsiteAddressTxt
Type Of Organization CorpYes (X)TypeOfOrganizationCorpInd
Formation2011FormationYr
Legal Domicile StateWILegalDomicileStateCd
Activity Or MissionTHE ORGANIZATION IS DEDICATED TO THE PROMOTION OF FREE MARKETS, LIMITED GOVERNMENT, INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY, AND A ROBUST CIVIL SOCIETY.ActivityOrMissionDesc
Voting Members Governing Body5VotingMembersGoverningBodyCnt
Voting Members Independent4VotingMembersIndependentCnt
Total Employee14TotalEmployeeCnt
Total Volunteers5TotalVolunteersCnt
Total Gross UBI$0TotalGrossUBIAmt
Net Unrelated Bus Txbl Incm$0NetUnrelatedBusTxblIncmAmt
PY Contributions Grants$2,973,108PYContributionsGrantsAmt
CY Contributions Grants$1,362,699CYContributionsGrantsAmt
PY Program Service Revenue$27,470PYProgramServiceRevenueAmt
CY Program Service Revenue$22,499CYProgramServiceRevenueAmt
PY Investment Income$683PYInvestmentIncomeAmt
CY Investment Income$1,017CYInvestmentIncomeAmt
PY Other Revenue$0PYOtherRevenueAmt
CY Other Revenue-$7,338CYOtherRevenueAmt
PY Total Revenue$3,001,261PYTotalRevenueAmt
CY Total Revenue$1,378,877CYTotalRevenueAmt
PY Grants And Similar Paid$288,838PYGrantsAndSimilarPaidAmt
CY Grants And Similar Paid$0CYGrantsAndSimilarPaidAmt
PY Benefits Paid To Members$0PYBenefitsPaidToMembersAmt
CY Benefits Paid To Members$0CYBenefitsPaidToMembersAmt
PY Salaries Comp Emp Bnft Paid$848,899PYSalariesCompEmpBnftPaidAmt
CY Salaries Comp Emp Bnft Paid$1,225,236CYSalariesCompEmpBnftPaidAmt
PY Total Prof Fndrsng Expns$5,006PYTotalProfFndrsngExpnsAmt
CY Total Prof Fndrsng Expns$14,005CYTotalProfFndrsngExpnsAmt
CY Total Fundraising Expense$104,937CYTotalFundraisingExpenseAmt
PY Other Expenses$166,896PYOtherExpensesAmt
CY Other Expenses$360,657CYOtherExpensesAmt
PY Total Expenses$1,309,639PYTotalExpensesAmt
CY Total Expenses$1,599,898CYTotalExpensesAmt
PY Revenues Less Expenses$1,691,622PYRevenuesLessExpensesAmt
CY Revenues Less Expenses-$221,021CYRevenuesLessExpensesAmt
Total Assets BOY$3,368,483TotalAssetsBOYAmt
Total Assets EOY$3,043,650TotalAssetsEOYAmt
Total Liabilities BOY$196,338TotalLiabilitiesBOYAmt
Total Liabilities EOY$92,526TotalLiabilitiesEOYAmt
Net Assets Or Fund Balances BOY$3,172,145NetAssetsOrFundBalancesBOYAmt
Net Assets Or Fund Balances EOY$2,951,124NetAssetsOrFundBalancesEOYAmt
Info In Schedule O Part IIIYes (X)InfoInScheduleOPartIIIInd
MissionTHE ORGANIZATION IS DEDICATED TO THE PROMOTION OF FREE MARKETS, LIMITED GOVERNMENT, INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY, AND A ROBUST CIVIL SOCIETY.MissionDesc
Significant New Program Srvc0SignificantNewProgramSrvcInd
Significant Change0SignificantChangeInd
Expense$384,458ExpenseAmt
Revenue$22,499RevenueAmt
DescTHE WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY IS DEDICATED TO THE PROMOTION OF FREE MARKETS, LIMITED GOVERNMENT, INDIVIDUAL LIBERTY, AND A ROBUST CIVIL SOCIETY THROUGH EDUCATION, LITIGATION AND PARTICIPATION IN PUBLIC DISCOURSE. AS A NON-PROFIT AND NON-PARTISAN ORGANIZATION, THE ORGANIZATION LITIGATES IN THE AREAS OF PROPERTY RIGHTS, THE FREEDOM TO EARN A LIVING, VOTING RIGHTS, REGULATION, TAXATION, SCHOOL CHOICE, AND RELIGIOUS FREEDOM. AS AN EDUCATION ORGANIZATION, THE ORGANIZATION STRIVES TO ADVANCE THE DEBATE CONCERNING LAW AND PUBLIC POLICY IN THESE AND OTHER AREAS.OTHER AREAS INCLUDE:OPEN RECORDS REQUESTS:WE HAVE ASSISTED MANY INDIVIDUALS AND ORGANIZATIONS WITH OPEN RECORDS REQUESTS. SUCH ASSISTANCE INCLUDES HELP DRAFTING REQUESTS, WRITING THREATENING LETTERS TO RECALCITRANT GOVERNMENT ENTITIES, AND PROVIDING ADVICE FOR WHAT DOCUMENTS TO REQUEST AND HOW TO REQUEST THEM. DEPUTY COUNSEL TOM KAMENICK BECAME A MEMBER OF THE WISCONSIN FREEDOM OF INFORMATION COUNCIL, AND PARTICIPATED IN THE COUNCIL'S SUNSHINE WEEK PANEL EVENT FOR THE MILWAUKEE PRESS CLUB.OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING:LIKE MANY OTHER STATES, WISCONSIN HAS SEVERELY RESTRICTED THE RIGHTS OF PERSONS TO ENTER CERTAIN TYPES OF PROFESSIONS AND START CERTAIN TYPES OF BUSINESSES. IN A SOCIETY CONCERNED WITH INCOME INEQUALITY, THIS IS A SIGNIFICANT BARRIER TO OPPORTUNITY. WE ARE WORKING WITH LIKE-MINDED GROUPS TO EXPLORE LEGAL AND POLICY APPROACHES TO THESE RESTRICTIONS. WE AUTHORED "FENCING OUT OPPORTUNITY" IN NOVEMBER 2016. THE STUDY EXPLORED THE COSTS OF OCCUPATIONAL LICENSING IN WISCONSIN AND HOW IT HAS GROWN IN THE LAST 20 YEARS.SOCIAL MEDIA:WE HAVE EXPANDED OUR SOCIAL MEDIA REACH WITH A GROWING TWITTER FOLLOWING AND A YOUTUBE CHANNEL. WE CONTINUE TO MAKE USE OF OUR WEBSITE'S BLOG AND OUR FACEBOOK PAGE. OUR ATTORNEYS HAVE BLOGGED ON VARIOUS TOPICS, INCLUDING OPEN RECORDS, SCHOOL CHOICE, EMINENT DOMAIN, EDUCATION POLICY, AND ECONOMIC LIBERTY. WE HAVE ADDED LINKS TO THOSE POSTS ON OUR FACEBOOK AND TWITTER ACCOUNTS, AS WELL AS USING THEM TO SHARE POSTS FROM LIKEMINDED INSTITUTIONS SUCH AS RIGHT WISCONSIN, THE GOLDWATER INSTITUTE AND THE INSTITUTE FOR JUSTICE.MEDIA & LEGISLATIVE APPEARANCES:MOST OF OUR ATTORNEYS, AND ESPECIALLY SO FOR OUR GENERAL COUNSEL, RICK ESENBERG, HAVE MADE MEDIA APPEARANCES TO DISCUSS TOPICS AS BROAD RANGING AS OUR LAWSUITS, RIGHT TO WORK, ACT 10, AND PROPOSED LOCAL ORDINANCES. THOSE APPEARANCES HAVE RANGED FROM LOCAL RADIO STATIONS AND NEWSPAPER ARTICLES TO STATEWIDE AND EVEN NATIONWIDE PROGRAMS. WE ARE FEATURED IN, AND CONTRIBUTE TO, OUTLETS SUCH AS THE WALL STREET JOURNAL, WASHINGTON POST, USA TODAY, US NEWS AND WORLD REPORT, PBS NEWS HOUR, WASHINGTON EXAMINER AND NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE.STATE BOARD APPOINTMENTS:THREE OF OUR ATTORNEYS HAVE BEEN APPOINTED BY GOVERNOR SCOTT WALKER TO SERVE ON STATE BOARDS. CJ SZAFIR WAS APPOINTED TO THE WISCONSIN COUNCIL ON MENTAL HEALTH, WHICH ADVISES THE GOVERNOR, THE LEGISLATURE AND THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH SERVICES ON THE ALLOCATION OF MENTAL HEALTH BLOCK GRANT FUNDS. TOM KAMENICK WAS APPOINTED TO SERVE ON THE WISCONSIN COUNCIL ON LIBRARY AND NETWORK DEVELOPMENT, WHICH ADVISES THE SUPERINTENDENT, THE GOVERNOR, AND THE LEGISLATURE ON ISSUES RELATED TO THE 3,600+ LIBRARIES ACROSS THE STATE. BRIAN MCGRATH SERVES ON THE WISCONSIN REAL ESTATE EXAMINING BOARD, AND WAS APPOINTED TO THE NEW BERLIN TOURISM COMMISSION.MARQUETTE INTERNSHIPS, VOLUNTEER OPPORTUNITIES:WE HAVE BEEN APPROVED TO BE PART OF MARQUETTE LAW SCHOOL'S INTERNSHIP PROGRAM, WHEREBY STUDENTS EARN CREDITS FOR WORKING AS INTERNS IN NONPROFIT ORGANIZATIONS AND GOVERNMENT AGENCIES. WE ALSO HAVE ATTORNEYS, LAW STUDENTS, AND UNDERGRADUATE STUDENTS VOLUNTEER THEIR TIME TO HELP ON VARIOUS PROJECTS.CASES LITIGATED IN 2016 INCLUDE:MACHINISTS LOCAL LODGE 1061 V. WALKER:UNIONS PREDICTABLY FILED A LAWSUIT IN DANE COUNTY CHALLENGING WISCONSIN'S NEW RIGHT TO WORK LAW WITHIN DAYS OF ITS PASSAGE. WE PARTNERED AGAIN WITH THE NATIONAL RIGHT TO WORK LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION TO DEFEND THE LAW BY FILING AN AMICUS BRIEF IN THE CIRCUIT COURT. THE COURT PERMITTED US TO ARGUE DURING THE HEARING, BUT RULED AGAINST US, DECLARING RIGHT TO WORK UNCONSTITUTIONAL. THAT JUDGE REFUSED TO STAY HIS RULING, BUT THE COURT OF APPEALS ACTED QUICKLY TO HALT IT AFTER THE STATE FILED A MOTION FOR AN EMERGENCY STAY AND WE FILED A SUPPORTING AMICUS BRIEF. THE CASE IS NOW ON APPEAL, AND WE HAVE AGAIN FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF SUPPORTING THE LAW.KRIST OIL V. BRANCEL:WISCONSIN LAW (KNOWN COMMONLY AS THE MINIMUM MARKUP LAW) FORBIDS MANUFACTURERS, WHOLESALERS, AND RETAILERS, WITH FEW EXCEPTIONS, FROM SELLING GOODS BEFORE SOME ARBITRARILY-DESIGNATED MEASURE OF "COSTS". WHAT'S MORE, FOR ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, AND GASOLINE, THE LAW ACTUALLY REQUIRES THEIR SALE AT A PERCENTAGE MARKED UP OVER "COST". THESE LAWS ARE BASED ON DISCREDITED ECONOMIC THEORIES CLAIMING THAT PROTECTING MERCHANTS FROM COMPETITION BENEFITS CONSUMERS. IN FACT, GUARANTEEING A PROFIT TO BUSINESSES ACTIVELY HARMS NOT ONLY CONSUMERS BUT THE ENTIRE MARKETPLACE. IN THE FACE OF LEGISLATIVE INACTION, WE FILED A LAWSUIT CHALLENGING THOSE LAWS.MILWAUKEE POLICE ASSOCIATION V. CITY OF MILWAUKEE:THE WISCONSIN LEGISLATURE PASSED A LAW BANNING MUNICIPALITIES AND SCHOOL DISTRICTS FROM PROHIBITING THEIR EMPLOYEES FROM LIVING OUTSIDE OF THEIR BORDERS. WHEN MILWAUKEE REFUSED TO ABIDE BY THE NEW LAW, IT WAS SUED BY ITS POLICE AND FIRE UNIONS. WILL FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF URGING THE SUPREME COURT TO TAKE THE CASE. THE COURT GRANTED THE PETITION, AND WILL FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ON THE MERITS AS WELL. THE SUPREME COURT REVERSED THE COURT OF APPEALS, RULING THAT MILWAUKEE COULD NO LONGER ENFORCE ITS RESIDENCY REQUIREMENT.VOTERS WITH FACTS V. EAU CLAIRE:EAU CLAIRE IS USING TIF DISTRICTS TO HAND MILLIONS OF DOLLARS TO A PRIVATE DEVELOPER IN ORDER TO BUILD A NEW PERFORMING ARTS CENTER AND OTHER BUILDINGS IN ITS HISTORIC DOWNTOWN DISTRICT. BUT CITIES ARE FIRST SUPPOSED TO MAKE SURE THAT (1) THE AREA IS TRULY BLIGHTED, AND (2) DEVELOPMENT WOULDN'T HAPPEN IN THE AREA WITHOUT THE TIF DISTRICT. IN EAU CLAIRE, NEITHER OF THOSE TWO THINGS HAPPENED - THE GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS MERELY REACHED THOSE CONCLUSIONS WITHOUT ACTUALLY SEEING ANY EVIDENCE THAT THEY WERE TRUE. ON BEHALF OF VOTERS WITH FACTS, A GROUP OPPOSED TO THE PROJECT, AND DOZENS OF LOCAL PROPERTY TAXPAYERS, WE SUED TO CHALLENGE THE DISTRICT. THE CASE IS PENDING IN THE COURT OF APPEALS.MCADAMS V. MARQUETTE:JOHN MCADAMS IS A CONSERVATIVE PROFESSOR AT MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY, TEACHING POLITICAL SCIENCE. MARQUETTE HAS INDEFINITELY SUSPENDED HIM FOR BLOGGING ABOUT A GRADUATE INSTRUCTOR WHO TOLD AN UNDERGRADUATE HE COULD NOT EXPRESS HIS DISAPPROVAL OF GAY MARRIAGE IN HER CLASS. ON MCADAMS' BEHALF, WE SUED MARQUETTE, ALLEGING THAT IT BREACHED ITS EMPLOYMENT CONTRACT IN NUMEROUS WAYS. THE CASE IS SOON TO BE APPEALED.HIGHLAND MEMORIAL V. WISCONSIN:WISCONSIN HAS AN ARCANE LAW PROHIBITING CEMETERY OWNERS FROM HAVING ANY OWNERSHIP INTEREST IN A FUNERAL HOME. THE LAW EVEN PROHIBITS MERELY HAVING A FUNERAL HOME ON CEMETERY GROUNDS, EVEN IF IT WERE OWNED AND MANAGED BY A WHOLLY-SEPARATE COMPANY. THE LAW DATES FROM THE 1930S, AND WAS ENACTED AT THE URGING OF THE FUNERAL HOME LOBBY, WHO WERE FACING A NEW THREAT OF PRIVATELY-OWNED CEMETERIES OPENING FUNERAL HOMES TO INCREASE THEIR ATTRACTIVENESS TO POTENTIAL CUSTOMERS. THE LAW SERVES NO PURPOSE OTHER THAN TO PROTECT FUNERAL HOMES FROM COMPETITION. MOST OTHER STATES PERMIT SUCH "COMBINATION" FIRMS, WHICH OFFER CONSUMERS MORE CHOICES AND HELP KEEP PRICES DOWN. ON BEHALF OF HIGHLAND MEMORIAL PARK, WE SUED TO HAVE THIS IRRATIONAL LAW STRUCK DOWN. THE CIRCUIT COURT RULED AGAINST US, AND WE HAVE APPEALED.MILEWSKI V. TOWN OF DOVER:THE RIGHT OF CITIZENS TO REFUSE TO CONSENT TO A GOVERNMENTAL SEARCH OF THEIR OWN HOME IS A FUNDAMENTAL TENET OF THE FOURTH AMENDMENT. A COROLLARY TO THAT TENET IS THAT THE GOVERNMENT MAY NOT PUNISH YOU FOR REFUSING TO CONSENT TO A SEARCH. YET WISCONSIN LAW PERMITS MUNICIPALITIES TO DEMAND ENTRY INTO YOUR HOME IN ORDER TO INSPECT IT FOR TAX ASSESSMENT PURPOSES, AND IF YOU REFUSE, YOU FOREVER LOSE THE ABILITY TO APPEAL YOUR ASSESSMENT. WE FILED A LAWSUIT CHALLENGING BOTH THE CONSTITUTIONALITY OF THE LAW BANNING APPEALS AND THE APPRAISER'S UNFAIR ASSESSMENT, TAKING THE CASE TO THE WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT, WHERE IT IS CURRENTLY PENDING.Desc

Prog Srvc Accom Acty2 ProgSrvcAccomActy2Grp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Expense$678,286ExpenseAmt
DescEDUCATION REFORM PROJECT:THIS PROJECT REVOLVES AROUND EXPANDING PARENTAL AND SCHOOL AUTONOMY, DISRUPTING THE ENTRENCHED BUREAUCRACIES, AND PUSHING FOR POLICIES THAT MAKE STATE FUNDS FOLLOW THE STUDENT. IN SHORT, WE SEEK TO PROMOTE AND DEFEND EDUCATIONAL CHOICE. WE PURSUE THESE OBJECTIVES THROUGH CAREFUL STRATEGIC LITIGATION AND PUBLIC ADVOCACY, INCLUDING REPORTS AND PRESS RELEASES. CASES LITIGATED IN 2016 INCLUDE:S.W. V. SUPERINTENDENT TONY EVERS: WISCONSIN HAS A STATE LAW THAT PERMITS STUDENTS TO OPEN ENROLL OUT OF THEIR "RESIDENT" SCHOOL DISTRICT AND ATTEND ANOTHER PUBLIC SCHOOL. OUR INVESTIGATIONS HAVE DISCOVERED THAT SPECIAL NEEDS STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES SUFFER SEVERE DISCRIMINATION IN THIS PROGRAM ON BOTH ENDS. FIRST, THE NON-RESIDENT DISTRICT CAN CREATE A "TWO-TRACK" SYSTEM WHERE THEY AGREE TO TAKE "REGULAR" STUDENTS THROUGH OPEN ENROLLMENT BUT REFUSE TO TAKE ANY STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES. THE AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT DOES NOT PERMIT THIS SORT OF DISCRIMINATION, AND WILL HAS FILED A LAWSUIT ON BEHALF OF SEVERAL FAMILIES WHOSE CHILDREN WERE DENIED OPEN ENROLLMENT BECAUSE THEY ARE DISABLED.ST. AUGUSTINE SCHOOL V. FRIESS LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT:ST. AUGUSTINE SCHOOL IS AN INDEPENDENT RELIGIOUS SCHOOL THAT ALIGNS ITS TEACHINGS TO THE CATHOLIC FAITH. DESPITE THE MILWAUKEE ARCHDIOCESE CONFIRMING IN WRITING TO THE DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION THAT ST. AUGUSTINE IS NOT AFFILIATED WITH THE ARCHDIOCESE, THE DPI INSISTS ON CLASSIFYING ST. AUGUSTINE AS A "CATHOLIC" SCHOOL. BASED UPON THIS CLASSIFICATION, SUPERINTENDENT EVERS AND FRIESS LAKE DENIED ST. AUGUSTINE THE TRANSPORTATION ATTENDANCE AREA IT IS ENTITLED TO UNDER STATE LAW. IN TURN, THIS DENIES TRANSPORTATION RIGHTS TO THREE CHILDREN WHO LIVE IN THE FRIESS LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT AND ATTEND ST. AUGUSTINE. WILL FILED A LAWSUIT AGAINST SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION TONY EVERS AND FRIESS LAKE SCHOOL DISTRICT FOR UNCONSTITUTIONALLY TRYING TO DECIDE WHO OR WHAT IS "CATHOLIC." KRUEGER V. APPLETON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT:THE APPLETON AREA SCHOOL DISTRICT CREATED A COMMITTEE TO REVIEW THE BOOK LIST FOR ITS 9TH GRADE ENGLISH CLASSES, BUT REFUSED TO ALLOW THE PUBLIC TO ATTEND THE COMMITTEE'S MEETINGS. WE FILED A LAWSUIT ALLEGING THAT THE DISTRICT'S ACTIONS VIOLATED THE OPEN MEETINGS LAW. WE TOOK THE CASE ALL THE WAY TO THE WISCONSIN SUPREME COURT, AND ARE AWAITING A RULING.DUNCAN V. NEVADA:NEVADA HAS BEEN ON THE FOREFRONT OF EDUCATION REFORM, BECOMING ONE OF THE FIRST STATES TO IMPLEMENT "EDUCATIONAL SAVINGS ACCOUNT" - TAX-FREE FUNDS THAT PARENTS CAN USE TO PAY FOR PRIMARY AND SECONDARY EDUCATIONAL SERVICES FROM A VARIETY OF PROVIDERS. PUBLIC TEACHER UNION SUPPORTERS FILED SUIT TO CHALLENGE THE ESAS, AND WILL FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE LAW ON BEHALF OF THE AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR CHILDREN, HISPANICS FOR SCHOOL CHOICE, SCHOOL CHOICE WISCONSIN, AND DR. PATRICK J. WOLF. THE NEVADA SUPREME COURT ULTIMATELY CONCLUDED THAT THE NEVADA LEGISLATURE COULD CREATE ESA'S WITHOUT VIOLATING THE STATE CONSTITUTION, ALTHOUGH IT HAD FAILED TO PROPERLY APPROPRIATE FUNDS FOR THE PROGRAM. REPORTS: "BANG FOR THE BUCK," JUNE 2016. NOT ALL PUBLIC SCHOOLS IN MILWAUKEE ARE CREATED EQUAL. THERE ARE TRADITIONAL MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS (MPS), EDUCATING 76% OF ALL CHILDREN IN MILWAUKEE. IN ADDITION, MILWAUKEE HAS PUBLIC CHARTER SCHOOLS THAT - USUALLY - HAVE LESS RED-TAPE THAN TRADITIONAL SCHOOLS, ALTHOUGH THEY ARE STILL "PUBLIC AND SUBJECT TO MANY OF THE LEGAL REQUIREMENTS IMPOSED ON PUBLIC SCHOOLS. OUR REPORT CALCULATES A RETURN ON INVESTMENT FOR TAXPAYER MONEY SPENT ON THE SCHOOLS RELATIVE TO THEIR ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE."BUSTING FOUR MORE MYTHS ABOUT SCHOOL CHOICE" MARCH 2016. AS THE WISCONSIN LEGISLATIVE SESSION COMES TO A CLOSE, IT IS TIME FOR ANOTHER EDITION OF WILL SCHOOL CHOICE "MYTH BUSTING." DURING THE SESSION, THERE HAS BEEN NO SHORTAGE OF EDUCATION TOPICS IN THE NEWS - FROM VOUCHER FUNDING TO THE U.S. JUSTICE DEPARTMENT'S INVESTIGATION OF THE MILWAUKEE SCHOOL CHOICE PROGRAM. UNFORTUNATELY, MORE OFTEN THAN NOT, THIS HAS RESULTED IN A DISTORTION AND TWISTING OF THE TRUTH. AS A RESULT, SOME MYTH BUSTING IS REQUIRED."UNDERTOLD STORIES OF ACT 10," APRIL 2016. AS WISCONSIN REACHES THE 5 YEAR ANNIVERSARY OF ACT 10, THE WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY (WILL) EXAMINED SCHOOL DISTRICTS ACROSS WISCONSIN TO DETERMINE HOW SUPERINTENDENTS ARE USING ACT 10 TO REFORM THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS. "THE IMPACT OF ACT 10 ON WISCONSIN'S EDUCATION WORKFORCE," JUNE 2016. THE PASSAGE AND IMPLEMENTATION OF ACT 10 - GOVERNOR WALKER'S SIGNATURE COLLECTIVE BARGAINING REFORM LAW - WAS ONE OF THE MOST CONTROVERSIAL EVENTS IN THE HISTORY OF WISCONSIN. OVER 100,000 PROTESTORS FILLED THE STATE CAPITOL, FEARFUL THAT PASSAGE OF THE LAW WOULD HAVE A DEVASTATING EFFECT ON THEIR LIVES. NEARLY 5 YEARS SINCE THE EFFECTIVE DATE OF ACT 10, JUNE 29, 2011, HAVE THESE FEARS BEEN REALIZED?"EDUCATION SAVINGS ACCOUNTS," JULY 2016. THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT IS THREEFOLD TO: DESCRIBE THE ESA CONCEPT AND ITS RATIONALE, SURVEY THE CURRENT STATUS OF ESAS IN THE UNITED STATES AND CONSIDER SOME OF THE MORE COMMON CRITICISMS; AND IDENTIFY CERTAIN ISSUES AND CHOICES THAT WILL CONFRONT POLICY MAKERS CONTEMPLATING A MOVE TO ESAS."STEM: GETTING BEYOND THE BUZZWORD," SEPTEMBER 2016. BASED UPON EXTENSIVE INTERVIEWS WITH SCHOOL LEADERS, THE REPORT TELLS THE STORY ABOUT WHY SCHOOLS ARE FOCUSING ON STEM, HOW SCHOOLS DEVELOP THEIR PROGRAMS, AND THE DIFFERENT WAYS THE STATE HAS ALLOWED STEM TO THRIVE. "THE ECONOMIC BENEFIT OF SCHOOL CHOICE IN MILWAUKEE," DECEMBER 2016. THE FISCAL IMPACT OF THE MPCP HAS LONG BEEN A SOURCE OF CONTENTION WITH THE CITY, MILWAUKEE PUBLIC SCHOOLS BOARD, AND THE STATE OF WISCONSIN. BUT THE DEBATE IS ALMOST ALWAYS SHORT-SIGHTED, NARROWLY FOCUSING ON ONE PIECE OF A MUCH BIGGER, MORE COMPLEX PUZZLE. IT NEGLECTS ANY DISCUSSION OF THE ECONOMIC BENEFIT OF SCHOOL CHOICE. THIS STUDY - THE FIRST OF ITS KIND IN MILWAUKEE - ATTEMPTS TO MONETIZE THE ECONOMIC IMPACT OF THE MILWAUKEE PARENTAL CHOICE PROGRAM OVER A 20 YEAR PERIOD.Desc

Prog Srvc Accom Acty3 ProgSrvcAccomActy3Grp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Expense$291,832ExpenseAmt
DescCENTER FOR COMPETITIVE FEDERALISM:THE CENTER ENGAGES IN STRATEGIC LITIGATION, PUBLIC EDUCATION AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF MODEL LEGISLATION TO ADVANCE AUTHENTIC CONSTITUTIONAL - OR "COMPETITIVE" - FEDERALISM.IN ITS FIRST YEAR, CCF HAS ISSUED THREE MAJOR POLICY REPORTS, FILED TWO AMICUS BRIEFS WITH THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT, ADVANCED MODEL LEGISLATION THROUGH THE ALEC PROCESS, FILED AN ORIGINAL ACTION IN WISCONSIN CIRCUIT COURT AGAINST A PROTECTIONIST BUTTER, SPOKEN TO NUMEROUS LIBERTY-MINDED GROUPS, INCLUDING THE FEDERALIST SOCIETY, AMERICANS FOR PROSPERITY, CPAC, AND AMERICAN MAJORITY, AND HAD COMMENTARY FEATURED IN NATIONAL REVIEW ONLINE AND THE FEDERALIST, AMONG OTHER OUTLETS.CASES LITIGATED IN 2016:IN RE G.G.:CCF FILED TWO AMICUS BRIEFS WITH THE U.S. SUPREME COURT IN A CASE ORIGINATING IN THE 4TH CIRCUIT. G.G. V. GLOUCESTER COUNTY SCHOOL BOARD INVOLVES A TRANSGENDER STUDENT THAT WAS NOT SATISFIED WITH THE ACCOMMODATIONS PROVIDED BY THE SCHOOL DISTRICT. SPECIFICALLY, THE STUDENT RELIED ON A "DEAR COLLEAGUE" LETTER GENERATED BY THE FEDERAL DEPARTMENTS OF EDUCATION AND JUSTICE. THE LETTER ADVISED SCHOOL DISTRICTS THAT A FAILURE TO ALLOW TRANSGENDER STUDENTS TO USE A BATHROOM OR CHANGING FACILITY OF THE STUDENT'S CHOICE WAS A VIOLATION OF TITLE IX.THE COURT OF APPEALS PROVIDED AUER DEFERENCE TO THE LETTER AND THEREFORE FOUND IN FAVOR OF THE STUDENT. THE SCHOOL BOARD APPEALED THE 4TH CIRCUIT DECISION TO THE SUPREME COURT. CCF FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF IN SUPPORT OF THE SCHOOL BOARD'S WRIT OF CERTIORARI IN SEPTEMBER. FOLLOWING THE COURT'S GRANT OF CERTIORARI, CCF THEN FILED AN AMICUS BRIEF ON THE MERITS IN JANUARY.SMITH, ET AL. V. BRANCEL:CCF BROUGHT AN ORIGINAL ACTION IN OZAUKEE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT, CHALLENGING A 1953 WISCONSIN STATUTE THAT PREVENTS CERTAIN INTERNATIONALLY PRODUCED BUTTERS FROM BEING SOLD IN THE STATE. THE LAWSUIT WAS FILED (FITTINGLY) ON ST. PATRICK'S DAY AND IMMEDIATELY GENERATED SIGNIFICANT MEDIA ATTENTION. REPORTS:CCF HAS ISSUED THREE POLICY REPORTS IN ADDITION TO SEVERAL SUBSTANTIVE MEMORANDA REQUESTED BY KEY MOVEMENT STAKEHOLDERS.THE FIRST REPORT, WISCONSIN NOT WASHINGTON: UNLEASHING THE CREATIVE POTENTIAL OF A PURPLE STATE, WAS ISSUED ABOUT JULY 11, 2016. IT ARGUED:"IN A PURPLE STATE LIKE WISCONSIN [AS OPPOSED TO TEXAS], REFORMS SHOULD STRESS NOT JUST LIMITED GOVERNMENT BUT GOOD GOVERNMENT. THEY SHOULD BE NOT JUST PRO-BUSINESS BUT PRO-COMPETITION, CHAMPIONING BASIC HUMAN RIGHTS - SUCH AS THE RIGHT TO WORK, THE FREEDOM OF ASSOCIATION, AND THE FREEDOM OF CONTRACT. THEY SHOULD DEFEND WORKING FAMILIES FROM THE SPECIAL INTERESTS THAT HAVE CAPTURED AMERICAN GOVERNMENT IN THE LAST CENTURY."QUICKLY FOLLOWING ON THE HEELS OF ITS FIRST REPORT, CCF ISSUED ITS SECOND REPORT, SHINING A LIGHT ON COERCION IN FEDERAL "ASSISTANCE" TO STATES, A MODEL POLICY FOR RESISTING FEDERAL COERCION. THE REPORT SUGGESTS THAT CASES SUCH AS SOUTH DAKOTA V. DOLE AND NFIB V. SEBELIUS PROVIDE A VERY USEFUL FRAMEWORK FOR DEFINING CONDITIONAL SPENDING GRANTS.CCF ISSUED ITS THIRD REPORT AGAIN IN CONJUNCTION WITH ITS ATTENDANCE AT ALEC'S DECEMBER STATES & NATION POLICY SUMMIT IN WASHINGTON D.C. THERE, IT RELEASED A COMMON CAUSE: UNITING THE STATES AGAINST FEDERAL OVERREACH, WHICH WAS PRESENTED TO BOTH TASK FORCES OF THE FEDERALISM AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS GROUPS. THE REPORT SUGGESTED SEVEN SPECIFIC PROPOSALS, ALL OF WHICH CENTERED ON THE MOST PROMISING AREA FOR SAVING FEDERALISM - THE STATES.IT RECOMMENDED (1) STATES CALL ON CONGRESSIONAL DELEGATIONS TO BE MORE MINDFUL OF THE COERCIVE IMPACT OF "COOPERATIVE FEDERALISM" PROGRAMS, (2) STATES FACILITATE STRATEGIC LITIGATION BY ATTORNEYS GENERAL, (3) ENACTING TRANSPARENCY MEASURES, ON BOTH THE FISCAL AND REGULATORY SIDE, (4) IMPLEMENTING MEASURES REQUIRING THE APPROVAL OF THE STATE LEGISLATURE BEFORE A STATE AGENCY MAY ENACT A REGULATION PURSUANT TO FEDERAL DIRECTIVES, (5) BEGINNING THE CORRESPONDENCE SUGGESTED BY JAMES MADISON IN FEDERALIST NO. 46, AND (6) STATES PLEDGE TO CALL ON CONGRESS TO CONVENE A CONVENTION OF STATES UNDER ARTICLE V OF THE CONSTITUTION, FOR THE PURPOSE OF REVIVING SOME OF THE CONSTITUTION'S LIMITS ON THE FEDERAL POWER TO SPEND AND REGULATE. ATTACHED TO THE REPORT WAS A MODEL DECLARATION OF STATES FOR THE PROTECTION OF THE CONSTITUTION.Desc
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Program Service Expenses$1,354,576TotalProgramServiceExpensesAmt
Described In Section501c3Yes (1)DescribedInSection501c3Ind
Schedule B RequiredYes (1)ScheduleBRequiredInd
Political Campaign Acty0PoliticalCampaignActyInd
Lobbying ActivitiesYes (1)LobbyingActivitiesInd
Subject To Proxy Tax0SubjectToProxyTaxInd
Donor Advised Fund0DonorAdvisedFundInd
Conservation Easements0ConservationEasementsInd
Collections Of Art0CollectionsOfArtInd
Credit Counseling0CreditCounselingInd
Temp Or Permanent Endowments0TempOrPermanentEndowmentsInd
Report Land Building EquipmentYes (1)ReportLandBuildingEquipmentInd
Report Investments Other Sec0ReportInvestmentsOtherSecInd
Report Program Related Invst0ReportProgramRelatedInvstInd
Report Other Assets0ReportOtherAssetsInd
Report Other Liabilities0ReportOtherLiabilitiesInd
Include FIN48 FootnoteYes (1)IncludeFIN48FootnoteInd
Independent Audit Fincl StmtYes (1)IndependentAuditFinclStmtInd
Consolidated Audit Fincl Stmt0ConsolidatedAuditFinclStmtInd
School Operating0SchoolOperatingInd
Foreign Office0ForeignOfficeInd
Foreign Activities0ForeignActivitiesInd
More Than5000 K To Org0MoreThan5000KToOrgInd
More Than5000 K To Individuals0MoreThan5000KToIndividualsInd
Professional Fundraising0ProfessionalFundraisingInd
Fundraising ActivitiesYes (1)FundraisingActivitiesInd
Gaming Activities0GamingActivitiesInd
Operate Hospital0OperateHospitalInd
Grants To Organizations0GrantsToOrganizationsInd
Grants To Individuals0GrantsToIndividualsInd
Schedule J RequiredYes (1)ScheduleJRequiredInd
Tax Exempt Bonds0TaxExemptBondsInd
Engaged In Excess Benefit Trans0EngagedInExcessBenefitTransInd
PY Excess Benefit Trans0PYExcessBenefitTransInd
Loan Outstanding0LoanOutstandingInd
Grant To Related Person0GrantToRelatedPersonInd
Business Rln With Org Mem0BusinessRlnWithOrgMemInd
Business Rln With Fam Mem0BusinessRlnWithFamMemInd
Business Rln With Officer Ent0BusinessRlnWithOfficerEntInd
Deductible Non Cash Contri0DeductibleNonCashContriInd
Deductible Art Contribution0DeductibleArtContributionInd
Terminate Operations0TerminateOperationsInd
Partial Liquidation0PartialLiquidationInd
Disregarded Entity0DisregardedEntityInd
Related Entity0RelatedEntityInd
Related Organization Ctrl Ent0RelatedOrganizationCtrlEntInd
Trnsfr Exmpt Non Chrtbl Rltd Org0TrnsfrExmptNonChrtblRltdOrgInd
Activities Conducted Prtshp0ActivitiesConductedPrtshpInd
Schedule O RequiredYes (1)ScheduleORequiredInd
IRP Document6IRPDocumentCnt
IRP Document W2 G0IRPDocumentW2GCnt
Backup Wthld ComplianceYes (1)BackupWthldComplianceInd
Employee14EmployeeCnt
Employment Tax Returns FiledYes (1)EmploymentTaxReturnsFiledInd
Unrelated Bus Incm Over Limit0UnrelatedBusIncmOverLimitInd
Foreign Financial Account0ForeignFinancialAccountInd
Prohibited Tax Shelter Trans0ProhibitedTaxShelterTransInd
Taxable Party Notification0TaxablePartyNotificationInd
Nondeductible Contributions0NondeductibleContributionsInd
Quid Pro Quo Contributions0QuidProQuoContributionsInd
Form8282 Property Disposed Of0Form8282PropertyDisposedOfInd
Rcv Fnds To Pay Prsnl Bnft Cntrct0RcvFndsToPayPrsnlBnftCntrctInd
Pay Premiums Prsnl Bnft Cntrct0PayPremiumsPrsnlBnftCntrctInd
Indoor Tanning Services0IndoorTanningServicesInd
Info In Schedule O Part VIYes (X)InfoInScheduleOPartVIInd
Governing Body Voting Members5GoverningBodyVotingMembersCnt
Independent Voting Member4IndependentVotingMemberCnt
Family Or Business Rln0FamilyOrBusinessRlnInd
Delegation Of Mgmt Duties0DelegationOfMgmtDutiesInd
Change To Org Documents0ChangeToOrgDocumentsInd
Material Diversion Or Misuse0MaterialDiversionOrMisuseInd
Members Or Stockholders0MembersOrStockholdersInd
Election Of Board Members0ElectionOfBoardMembersInd
Decisions Subject To Approva0DecisionsSubjectToApprovaInd
Minutes Of Governing BodyYes (1)MinutesOfGoverningBodyInd
Minutes Of CommitteesYes (1)MinutesOfCommitteesInd
Officer Mailing Address0OfficerMailingAddressInd
Local Chapters0LocalChaptersInd
Form990 Provided To Gvrn BodyYes (1)Form990ProvidedToGvrnBodyInd
Conflict Of Interest PolicyYes (1)ConflictOfInterestPolicyInd
Annual Disclosure Covered PrsnYes (1)AnnualDisclosureCoveredPrsnInd
Regular Monitoring EnfrcYes (1)RegularMonitoringEnfrcInd
Whistleblower PolicyYes (1)WhistleblowerPolicyInd
Document Retention PolicyYes (1)DocumentRetentionPolicyInd
Compensation Process CEOYes (1)CompensationProcessCEOInd
Compensation Process OtherYes (1)CompensationProcessOtherInd
Investment In Joint Venture0InvestmentInJointVentureInd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldWIStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
Own WebsiteYes (X)OwnWebsiteInd
Upon RequestYes (X)UponRequestInd

Books In Care Of Detail BooksInCareOfDetail

Business Name BusinessName

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1WISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY INCBusinessNameLine1Txt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Phone4147279455PhoneNum

US Address USAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line11139 E KNAPP STREETAddressLine1Txt
CityMILWAUKEECityNm
State AbbreviationWIStateAbbreviationCd
ZIP532022828ZIPCd

Form990 Part VII Section A Form990PartVIISectionAGrp (6 entries)

TitleTitleTxtAverage Hours Per WeekAverageHoursPerWeekRtIndividual Trustee Or DirectorIndividualTrusteeOrDirectorIndOfficerOfficerIndHighest Compensated EmployeeHighestCompensatedEmployeeIndReportable Comp From OrgReportableCompFromOrgAmtReportable Comp From Rltd OrgReportableCompFromRltdOrgAmtOther CompensationOtherCompensationAmt
RICHARD M ESENBERG
PRESIDENT AND TREASURER40.00Yes (X)Yes (X)Yes (X)$253,574$0$54,179
JAMES T BARRY III
DIRECTOR1.00Yes (X)$0$0$0
MICHAEL H WHITE
DIRECTOR1.00Yes (X)$0$0$0
CHRISTOPHER WOLFE
DIRECTOR1.00Yes (X)$0$0$0
MICHAEL W GREBE
DIRECTOR1.00Yes (X)$0$0$0
STACY A STUECK
SECRETARY40.00Yes (X)$80,000$0$22,212
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Reportable Comp From Org$333,574TotalReportableCompFromOrgAmt
Tot Reportable Comp Rltd Org$0TotReportableCompRltdOrgAmt
Total Other Compensation$76,391TotalOtherCompensationAmt
Indiv Rcvd Greater Than100 K1IndivRcvdGreaterThan100KCnt
Former Ofcr Employees Listed0FormerOfcrEmployeesListedInd
Total Comp Greater Than150 KYes (1)TotalCompGreaterThan150KInd
Compensation From Other Srcs0CompensationFromOtherSrcsInd
Cntrct Rcvd Greater Than100 K0CntrctRcvdGreaterThan100KCnt
Fundraising$9,690FundraisingAmt
All Other Contributions$1,353,009AllOtherContributionsAmt
Total Contributions$1,362,699TotalContributionsAmt

Program Service Revenue ProgramServiceRevenueGrp (2 entries)

DescDescBusinessBusinessCdTotal Revenue ColumnTotalRevenueColumnAmtRelated Or Exempt Func IncomeRelatedOrExemptFuncIncomeAmt
STATUTORY FEES544110$20,522$20,522
REIMBURSED CASE COST544110$1,977$1,977
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Program Service Revenue$22,499TotalProgramServiceRevenueAmt

Investment Income InvestmentIncomeGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Revenue Column$1,017TotalRevenueColumnAmt
Exclusion$1,017ExclusionAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Fundraising Gross Income$15,700FundraisingGrossIncomeAmt
Contri Rpt Fundraising Event$9,690ContriRptFundraisingEventAmt
Fundraising Direct Expenses$23,038FundraisingDirectExpensesAmt

Net Incm From Fundraising Evt NetIncmFromFundraisingEvtGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Revenue Column-$7,338TotalRevenueColumnAmt
Exclusion-$7,338ExclusionAmt

Total Revenue TotalRevenueGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Revenue Column$1,378,877TotalRevenueColumnAmt
Related Or Exempt Func Income$22,499RelatedOrExemptFuncIncomeAmt
Unrelated Business Revenue$0UnrelatedBusinessRevenueAmt
Exclusion-$6,321ExclusionAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Info In Schedule O Part IXYes (X)InfoInScheduleOPartIXInd

Comp Current Ofcr Directors CompCurrentOfcrDirectorsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$409,965TotalAmt
Program Services$276,809ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$102,380ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$30,776FundraisingAmt

Other Salaries And Wages OtherSalariesAndWagesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$575,716TotalAmt
Program Services$536,529ProgramServicesAmt
Fundraising$39,187FundraisingAmt

Pension Plan Contributions PensionPlanContributionsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$54,124TotalAmt
Program Services$50,205ProgramServicesAmt
Fundraising$3,919FundraisingAmt

Other Employee Benefits OtherEmployeeBenefitsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$119,615TotalAmt
Program Services$112,702ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$744ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$6,169FundraisingAmt

Payroll Taxes PayrollTaxesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$65,816TotalAmt
Program Services$56,093ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$5,255ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$4,468FundraisingAmt

Fees For Services Legal FeesForServicesLegalGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$1,150TotalAmt
Management And General$1,150ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Fees For Services Accounting FeesForServicesAccountingGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$10,634TotalAmt
Management And General$10,634ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Fees For Services Prof Fundraising FeesForServicesProfFundraising

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$14,005TotalAmt
Fundraising$14,005FundraisingAmt

Fees For Services Other FeesForServicesOtherGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$178,439TotalAmt
Program Services$177,151ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$1,288ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Advertising AdvertisingGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$243TotalAmt
Management And General$243ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Office Expenses OfficeExpensesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$7,959TotalAmt
Program Services$2,633ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$1,419ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$3,907FundraisingAmt

Information Technology InformationTechnologyGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$2,796TotalAmt
Management And General$2,796ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Occupancy OccupancyGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$40,609TotalAmt
Program Services$36,548ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$2,187ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$1,874FundraisingAmt

Travel TravelGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$27,766TotalAmt
Program Services$27,474ProgramServicesAmt
Fundraising$292FundraisingAmt

Conferences Meetings ConferencesMeetingsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$7,992TotalAmt
Program Services$7,992ProgramServicesAmt

Depreciation Depletion DepreciationDepletionGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$7,473TotalAmt
Program Services$6,736ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$397ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$340FundraisingAmt

Insurance InsuranceGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$8,288TotalAmt
Program Services$5,192ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$3,096ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Other Expenses OtherExpensesGrp (4 entries)

DescDescTotalTotalAmtProgram ServicesProgramServicesAmt
PUBLIC OUTREACH$23,161$23,161
MEMBERSHIP AND DUES$12,386$12,386
SUBSCRIPTIONS AND REFER$10,437$10,437
CASE COSTS$10,003$10,003

All Other Expenses AllOtherExpensesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$11,321TotalAmt
Program Services$2,525ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$8,796ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Total Functional Expenses TotalFunctionalExpensesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$1,599,898TotalAmt
Program Services$1,354,576ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$140,385ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$104,937FundraisingAmt

Savings And Temp Cash Invst SavingsAndTempCashInvstGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$2,012,887BOYAmt
EOY$2,087,927EOYAmt

Pledges And Grants Receivable PledgesAndGrantsReceivableGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$1,320,797BOYAmt
EOY$912,730EOYAmt

Prepaid Expenses Defrd Charges PrepaidExpensesDefrdChargesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$19,037BOYAmt
EOY$16,664EOYAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Land Bldg Equip Cost Or Other Bss$37,710LandBldgEquipCostOrOtherBssAmt
Land Bldg Equip Accum Deprec$11,381LandBldgEquipAccumDeprecAmt

Land Bldg Equip Basis Net LandBldgEquipBasisNetGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$15,762BOYAmt
EOY$26,329EOYAmt

Total Assets TotalAssetsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$3,368,483BOYAmt
EOY$3,043,650EOYAmt

Accounts Payable Accr Expnss AccountsPayableAccrExpnssGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$7,500BOYAmt
EOY$3,688EOYAmt

Grants Payable GrantsPayableGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$188,838BOYAmt
EOY$88,838EOYAmt

Total Liabilities TotalLiabilitiesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$196,338BOYAmt
EOY$92,526EOYAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Organization Follows SFAS117Yes (X)OrganizationFollowsSFAS117Ind

Unrestricted Net Assets UnrestrictedNetAssetsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$1,190,122BOYAmt
EOY$1,209,783EOYAmt

Temporarily Rstr Net Assets TemporarilyRstrNetAssetsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$1,982,023BOYAmt
EOY$1,741,341EOYAmt

Total Net Assets Fund Balance TotalNetAssetsFundBalanceGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$3,172,145BOYAmt
EOY$2,951,124EOYAmt

Tot Liab Net Assets Fund Balance TotLiabNetAssetsFundBalanceGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$3,368,483BOYAmt
EOY$3,043,650EOYAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Reconcilation Revenue Expnss-$221,021ReconcilationRevenueExpnssAmt
Other Changes In Net Assets$0OtherChangesInNetAssetsAmt
Method Of Accounting AccrualYes (X)MethodOfAccountingAccrualInd
Accountant Compile Or Review0AccountantCompileOrReviewInd
FS AuditedYes (1)FSAuditedInd

FS Audited Basis FSAuditedBasisGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Separate Basis Fincl StmtYes (X)SeparateBasisFinclStmtInd
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Audit Committee0AuditCommitteeInd
Federal Grant Audit Required0FederalGrantAuditRequiredInd

Schedule A IRS990ScheduleA

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Public Organization170Yes (X)PublicOrganization170Ind

Gifts Grants Contri Rcvd170 GiftsGrantsContriRcvd170Grp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Tax Year Minus4 Years$653,128CurrentTaxYearMinus4YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus3 Years$906,928CurrentTaxYearMinus3YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus2 Years$1,462,199CurrentTaxYearMinus2YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus1 Year$2,973,108CurrentTaxYearMinus1YearAmt
Current Tax Year$1,368,137CurrentTaxYearAmt
Total$7,363,500TotalAmt

Total Calendar Year170 TotalCalendarYear170Grp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Tax Year Minus4 Years$653,128CurrentTaxYearMinus4YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus3 Years$906,928CurrentTaxYearMinus3YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus2 Years$1,462,199CurrentTaxYearMinus2YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus1 Year$2,973,108CurrentTaxYearMinus1YearAmt
Current Tax Year$1,368,137CurrentTaxYearAmt
Total$7,363,500TotalAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Substantial Contributors Tot$5,811,687SubstantialContributorsTotAmt
Public Support Total170$1,551,813PublicSupportTotal170Amt

Gross Investment Income170 GrossInvestmentIncome170Grp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Tax Year Minus4 Years$247CurrentTaxYearMinus4YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus3 Years$204CurrentTaxYearMinus3YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus2 Years$410CurrentTaxYearMinus2YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus1 Year$683CurrentTaxYearMinus1YearAmt
Current Tax Year$1,017CurrentTaxYearAmt
Total$2,561TotalAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Support$7,366,061TotalSupportAmt
Gross Receipts Rltd Activities$241,166GrossReceiptsRltdActivitiesAmt
Public Support CY1700.21070PublicSupportCY170Pct
Public Support PY1700.16380PublicSupportPY170Pct
Ten Pct Facts Crcmstncs Test CYYes (X)TenPctFactsCrcmstncsTestCYInd
Facts And Circumstances TestWISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY, INC. IS A PUBLICLY SUPPORTED ORGANIZATION BASED ON THE FOLLOWING FACTS AND CIRCUMSTANCES:1. PERCENTAGE OF FINANCIAL SUPPORT: FOR THE CALENDAR YEAR ENDED 2016, OUR PUBLIC SUPPORT PERCENTAGE WAS 21.07%, WHICH WAS SIGNIFICANTLY OVER THE 10% THRESHOLD. IN ADDITION, THE PERCENTAGE HAS INCREASED OVER THE FIVE YEAR PERIOD. TO THE EXTENT THAT OUR CURRENT LEVEL OF PUBLIC SUPPORT IS NOT HIGHER, IT IS BECAUSE THE SUPPORT OF LARGE - AND UNRELATED - PUBLIC FOUNDATIONS HAS INCREASED AS OUR SUPPORT FROM SMALLER DONORS HAS INCREASED.2. SOURCES OF SUPPORT: OVER THE COURSE OF OUR ORGANIZATION'S HISTORY, OUR SOURCES OF SUPPORT HAVE CONTINUED TO INCREASE. WE BEGAN WITH ONE SEED DONOR IN 2011 AND HAVE NOW GROWN OUR SUPPORT BASE TO OVER 400 DONORS THAT INCLUDE BOTH PRIVATE FOUNDATION AND INDIVIDUALS. DURING 2016, WE HIRED A FULL-TIME DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR THAT WILL ALLOW OUR FUNDRAISING TO EXPAND NATIONALLY IN ORDER TO INCREASE OUR DONOR BASE.3. REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNING BODY: OUR BOARD OF DIRECTORS IS COMPOSED OF A DIVERSE GROUP WHO WELL REPRESENT THE PUBLIC THAT WE SERVE. THEY INCLUDE JAMES T. BARRY, III, CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS. HE SERVES AS THE PRESIDENT OF THE BARRY COMPANY, A COMMERCIAL REAL ESTATE FIRM IN MILWAUKEE, WISCONSIN. CHRISTOPHER WOLFE, IS PROFESSOR OF POLITICS AT THE UNIVERSITY OF DALLAS AND EMERITUS PROFESSOR OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AT MARQUETTE UNIVERSITY. MICHAEL WHITE IS THE OWNER AND CHAIRMAN OF THE BOARD OF RITE HITE HOLDING COMPANY, A WORLD LEADER IN THE MANUFACTURE AND SALE OF LOADING DOCK EQUIPMENT, INDUSTRIAL DOORS, SAFETY BARRIERS AND HIGH-VOLUME, LOW-SPEED INDUSTRIAL FANS. RICHARD ESENBERG, FOUNDER, PRESIDENT, AND GENERAL COUNSEL OF WILL. MICHAEL GREBE, FORMER PRESIDENT AND CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AT THE LYNDE AND HARRY BRADLEY FOUNDATION INC. SINCE 2002, RECENTLY RETIRED IN JULY, 2016. HE WAS ADDED TO OUR BOARD IN SEPTEMBER OF 2016. 4. AVAILABILITY OF PUBLIC SERVICE; PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN PROGRAM OR POLICIES: OUR MISSION IS TO PROVIDE LEGAL AND POLICY SERVICES AND EDUCATE THE PUBLIC. WE PROVIDE ALL OF OUR SERVICES - LITIGATION, LEGAL ADVICE, POLICY INFORMATION, AND EDUCATION - AT NO COST TO OUR CLIENTS. WE REGULARLY PUBLISH ITEMS THAT ARE USED BY LEGISLATORS, EDUCATORS, INSTITUTIONS AND THE GENERAL PUBLIC.FactsAndCircumstancesTestTxt

Schedule B IRS990ScheduleB

Contributor Information ContributorInformationGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
ContributorRESTRICTEDContributorNum

Contributor Business Name ContributorBusinessName

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1RESTRICTEDBusinessNameLine1

Contributor US Address ContributorUSAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line1RESTRICTEDAddressLine1
Address Line2RESTRICTEDAddressLine2
CityRESTRICTEDCity
StateRESTRICTEDState
ZIP CodeRESTRICTEDZIPCode
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total ContributionsRESTRICTEDTotalContributionsAmt

Schedule C IRS990ScheduleC

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Volunteers0VolunteersInd
Paid Staff Or ManagementYes (1)PaidStaffOrManagementInd
Media Advertisements0MediaAdvertisementsInd
Mailings Members0MailingsMembersInd
Publications Or Broadcast0PublicationsOrBroadcastInd
Grants Other Organizations0GrantsOtherOrganizationsInd
Direct Contact LegislatorsYes (1)DirectContactLegislatorsInd
Direct Contact Legislators$500DirectContactLegislatorsAmt
Rallies Demonstrations0RalliesDemonstrationsInd
Other Activities0OtherActivitiesInd
Total Lobbying Expenditures$500TotalLobbyingExpendituresAmt
Not Described Section501c30NotDescribedSection501c3Ind

Supplemental Information Detail SupplementalInformationDetail

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Form And Line ReferencePART II-B, LINE 1:FormAndLineReferenceDesc
ExplanationWE PROVIDED ADVICE TO CERTAIN GROUPS REGARDING THEIR LEGISLATIVE AGENDA. WE PREPARED MODEL LEGISLATION REGARDING COERCIVE FEDERAL GRANTS AND SPENT A SHORT PERIOD OF TIME (PROBABLY LESS THAN ONE HOUR) DISCUSSING THIS WITH LEGISLATIVE STAFF. WE ESTIMATE THAT THE TIME SPENT ON THESE ACTIVITIES WAS LESS THAN 50 HOURS.ExplanationTxt

Schedule D IRS990ScheduleD

Equipment EquipmentGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Other Cost Or Other Basis$37,710OtherCostOrOtherBasisAmt
Depreciation$11,381DepreciationAmt
Book Value$26,329BookValueAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Book Value Land Buildings$26,329TotalBookValueLandBuildingsAmt
Footnote TextYes (X)FootnoteTextInd
Total Rev Etc Audited Fincl Stmt$1,378,877TotalRevEtcAuditedFinclStmtAmt
Revenue Not Reported$0RevenueNotReportedAmt
Revenue Subtotal$1,378,877RevenueSubtotalAmt
Revenue Not Reported Fincl Stmt$0RevenueNotReportedFinclStmtAmt
Total Revenue Per Form990$1,378,877TotalRevenuePerForm990Amt
Tot Expns Etc Audited Fincl Stmt$1,599,898TotExpnsEtcAuditedFinclStmtAmt
Expenses Not Reported$0ExpensesNotReportedAmt
Expenses Subtotal$1,599,898ExpensesSubtotalAmt
Expenses Not Rpt Fincl Stmt$0ExpensesNotRptFinclStmtAmt
Total Expenses Per Form990$1,599,898TotalExpensesPerForm990Amt

Supplemental Information Detail SupplementalInformationDetail

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Form And Line ReferencePART X, LINE 2:FormAndLineReferenceDesc
ExplanationWISCONSIN INSTITUTE FOR LAW & LIBERTY DID NOT HAVE UNRECOGNIZED TAX BENEFITS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015 AND DOES NOT EXPECT THIS TO CHANGE SIGNIFICANTLY OVER THE NEXT 12 MONTHS. THE ORGANIZATION WOULD RECOGNIZE ANY INTEREST AND PENALTIES ASSOCIATED WITH THE ORGANIZATION'S TAX POSITIONS AS A COMPONENT OF UNRELATED BUSINESS INCOME TAX EXPENSE ON THE STATEMENT OF ACTIVITIES. AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2016 AND 2015, THE ORGANIZATION HAS NOT ACCRUED INTEREST OR PENALTIES RELATED TO UNCERTAIN TAX POSITIONS.ExplanationTxt

Schedule G IRS990ScheduleG

Fundraising Event Information FundraisingEventInformationGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Event15TH ANNIVERSARY EVENTEvent1Nm
Gross Receipts Event1$25,390GrossReceiptsEvent1Amt
Charitable Contri Event1$9,690CharitableContriEvent1Amt
Gross Revenue Event1$15,700GrossRevenueEvent1Amt
Food And Beverage Event1$16,799FoodAndBeverageEvent1Amt
Other Direct Expenses Event1$6,239OtherDirectExpensesEvent1Amt
Gross Receipts Total$25,390GrossReceiptsTotalAmt
Charitable Contributions Tot$9,690CharitableContributionsTotAmt
Gross Revenue Total Events$15,700GrossRevenueTotalEventsAmt
Food And Beverage Total Events$16,799FoodAndBeverageTotalEventsAmt
Oth Direct Expnss Total Events$6,239OthDirectExpnssTotalEventsAmt
Direct Expense Summary Events$23,038DirectExpenseSummaryEventsAmt
Net Income Summary-$7,338NetIncomeSummaryAmt

Schedule J IRS990ScheduleJ

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Board Or Committee ApprovalYes (X)BoardOrCommitteeApprovalInd
Severance Payment0SeverancePaymentInd
Supplemental Nonqual Rtr Plan0SupplementalNonqualRtrPlanInd
Equity Based Comp Arrngm0EquityBasedCompArrngmInd
Comp Based On Revenue Of Flng Org0CompBasedOnRevenueOfFlngOrgInd
Comp Bsd On Rev Related Orgs0CompBsdOnRevRelatedOrgsInd
Comp Bsd Net Earns Flng Org0CompBsdNetEarnsFlngOrgInd
Comp Bsd Net Earns Rltd Orgs0CompBsdNetEarnsRltdOrgsInd
Any Non Fixed Payments0AnyNonFixedPaymentsInd
Initial Contract Exception0InitialContractExceptionInd

Rltd Org Officer Trst Key Empl RltdOrgOfficerTrstKeyEmplGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
PersonRICHARD M ESENBERGPersonNm
TitlePRESIDENT AND TREASURERTitleTxt
Base Compensation Filing Org$253,574BaseCompensationFilingOrgAmt
Compensation Based On Rltd Orgs$0CompensationBasedOnRltdOrgsAmt
Bonus Filing Organization$0BonusFilingOrganizationAmount
Bonus Related Organizations$0BonusRelatedOrganizationsAmt
Other Compensation Filing Org$0OtherCompensationFilingOrgAmt
Other Compensation Rltd Orgs$0OtherCompensationRltdOrgsAmt
Deferred Compensation Flng Org$25,200DeferredCompensationFlngOrgAmt
Deferred Comp Rltd Orgs$0DeferredCompRltdOrgsAmt
Nontaxable Benefits Filing Org$28,979NontaxableBenefitsFilingOrgAmt
Nontaxable Benefits Rltd Orgs$0NontaxableBenefitsRltdOrgsAmt
Total Compensation Filing Org$307,753TotalCompensationFilingOrgAmt
Total Compensation Rltd Orgs$0TotalCompensationRltdOrgsAmt
Comp Report Prior990 Filing Org$0CompReportPrior990FilingOrgAmt
Comp Report Prior990 Rltd Orgs$0CompReportPrior990RltdOrgsAmt

Schedule O IRS990ScheduleO

Supplemental Information Detail SupplementalInformationDetail (7 entries)

Form And Line ReferenceFormAndLineReferenceDescExplanationExplanationTxt
FORM 990, PAGE 2, LINE 4A, DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM SERVICE:GERHARD V. GREEN BAY: FEES SOUGHT AND RECOVERED IN 2016: $18,768 WE REPRESENTED A COUPLE IN GREEN BAY WHOSE BEAUTIFUL NATURAL LANDSCAPED YARD WAS DESTROYED BY THE CITY WITHOUT PROPER NOTICE AFTER A NEIGHBOR COMPLAINED THAT IT WAS "UNSIGHTLY," A VAGUE TERM THAT PURPORTEDLY ALLOWS LOCAL GOVERNMENT OFFICIALS TO ENTER PRIVATE LAND AND DESTROY PRIVATE PROPERTY. WHEN THE CITY REFUSED TO EVEN NEGOTIATE THE GERHARDS' CLAIM, WE SUED IN FEDERAL COURT. AFTER DISCOVERY, THE CITY AGREED TO PAY THE GERHARDS DAMAGES AND ATTORNEY FEES IN SETTLEMENT. RESOLVED CASES: KITTLE V. JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT: LITIGATED IN 2015. FEES SOUGHT AND RECOVERED IN 2016: $1,754 ALL AROUND WISCONSIN OVER THE PAST COUPLE YEARS, MANY (BUT NOT ALL) POLICE AND SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENTS HAVE STARTED REDACTING BASIC INFORMATION FROM CITATIONS AND REPORTS, THE INFORMATION PEOPLE WANT TO KNOW MOST - THE IDENTITY OF THE MISCREANT ABOUT WHOM THE REPORT OR CITATION WAS WRITTEN. WHY? BECAUSE THAT INFORMATION IS USUALLY EITHER OBTAINED FROM OR VERIFIED BY THE DOT DRIVERS' DATABASE, AND THEY THINK THEY WILL GET IN TROUBLE IF THEY SHARE THAT INFORMATION. BUT THAT POLICY IS AN OVERREACTION TO A SEVENTH CIRCUIT CASE THAT HELD A VILLAGE IN ILLINOIS HAD "DISCLOSED" IDENTIFYING INFORMATION IN VIOLATION OF THE DRIVER'S PRIVACY PROTECTION ACT, A LAW ENACTED IN THE 90'S TO PREVENT DMV'S FROM SELLING DRIVER INFORMATION AND STALKERS FROM LEARNING WHERE TARGETS LIVED THROUGH MOTOR VEHICLE RECORDS. BUT THAT CASE WAS NOT AN OPEN RECORDS REQUEST CASE, AND THE COURT DID NOT CONSIDER ANY OF THE 14 EXCEPTIONS THAT PERMIT THE GOVERNMENT TO DISCLOSE SUCH INFORMATION. ONE EXCEPTION IS IN CARRYING OUT ANY DUTY IMPOSED BY LAW, AND RESPONDING TO OPEN RECORDS REQUESTS IS A DUTY IMPOSED BY LAW; THEREFORE, THE DPPA SHOULD NOT REQUIRE REDACTION OF RECORDS. ON BEHALF OF A REPORTER AT WISCONSIN REPORTER, M.D. KITTLE, WE BROUGHT A LAWSUIT AGAINST THE JEFFERSON COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT FOR REDACTING RECORDS AND CLAIMING THE DPPA REQUIRES IT. THE CASE SETTLED WHEN THE SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT AGREED TO TURN OVER UNREDACTED RECORDS AND PAY WILL'S ATTORNEY FEES.
FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 11BFORM 990 IS REVIEWED BY THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR AND BOARD PRESIDENT PRIOR TO FILING WITH THE IRS.
FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 12CBOARD MEMBERS AND KEY PERSONNEL COMPLETE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ON AN ANNUAL BASIS. DISCLOSURE OF POSSIBLE CONFLICTS OF INTEREST ARE REVIEWED BY THE ENTIRE BOARD.
FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 15COMPENSATION OF THE PRESIDENT AND KEY PERSONNEL IS REVIEWED ANNUALLY BY THE BOARD. COMPARATIVE DATA IS USED TO REVIEW COMPENSATION LEVELS FOR ALL STAFF.
FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION C, LINE 18THE ORGANIZATION'S FORM 990 IS AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION AT THE ORGANIZATION'S LOCATION DURING BUSINESS HOURS. COPIES ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.
FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION C, LINE 19ALL GOVERNING DOCUMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY, AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ARE AVAILABLE UPON REQUEST.
FORM 990, PART IX, LINE 11GINDEPENDENT CONTRACTORS : PROGRAM SERVICE EXPENSES 177,151. MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL EXPENSES 0. FUNDRAISING EXPENSES 0. TOTAL EXPENSES 177,151. RETIREMENT ACCT EXPENSES : PROGRAM SERVICE EXPENSES 0. MANAGEMENT AND GENERAL EXPENSES 1,288. FUNDRAISING EXPENSES 0. TOTAL EXPENSES 1,288.

Comments

Anonymous: no account or email. Up to 2,000 characters, at most one link. Comments are checked automatically; some wait for review.