NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND: Form 990, tax year 2023

View the entire original 990 at ProPublica ↗

Organization
NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND (EIN 84-0611876)
Tax period
2023-10-01 to 2024-09-30
Filed
2025-04-18
IRS object ID
202531089349301513
Schema version
2023v6.0
Source
Download XML · Original 990 at ProPublica

Every field in the e-filed return. Faint text is the IRS element name, for citing.

Return header ReturnHeader

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Return2025-04-18T13:02:23+00:00ReturnTs
Tax Period End2024-09-30TaxPeriodEndDt

Preparer Firm PreparerFirmGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Preparer Firm EIN440160260PreparerFirmEIN

Preparer Firm Name PreparerFirmName

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1Forvis Mazars LLPBusinessNameLine1Txt

Preparer US Address PreparerUSAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line1111 South Tejon Suite 800AddressLine1Txt
CityColorado SpringsCityNm
State AbbreviationCOStateAbbreviationCd
ZIP809039848ZIPCd
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Return Type990ReturnTypeCd
Tax Period Begin2023-10-01TaxPeriodBeginDt

Filer Filer

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
EIN840611876EIN

Business Name BusinessName

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND INCBusinessNameLine1Txt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name ControlNATIBusinessNameControlTxt
Phone3034478760PhoneNum

US Address USAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line1250 ARAPAHOE AVENUEAddressLine1Txt
CityBOULDERCityNm
State AbbreviationCOStateAbbreviationCd
ZIP803025821ZIPCd

Business Officer BusinessOfficerGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
PersonMICHAEL KENNEDYPersonNm
Person TitleCFOPersonTitleTxt
Phone3034478760PhoneNum
Signature2025-04-18SignatureDt
Discuss With Paid PreparerYes (true)DiscussWithPaidPreparerInd
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
IRS Responsible Prty Info CurrYes (true)IRSResponsiblePrtyInfoCurrInd

Preparer Person PreparerPersonGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Preparer PersonAdam R SmithPreparerPersonNm
PTINP00958966PTIN
Phone7194714290PhoneNum
Preparation2025-05-15PreparationDt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Tax2023TaxYr
Build TS2025-03-06 01:10:19ZBuildTS

Form 990 IRS990

Principal Ofcr Business Name PrincipalOfcrBusinessName

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1JOHN ECHOHAWKBusinessNameLine1Txt

US Address USAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line1250 ARAPAHOE AVENUEAddressLine1Txt
CityBOULDERCityNm
State AbbreviationCOStateAbbreviationCd
ZIP803025821ZIPCd
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Gross Receipts$34,063,005GrossReceiptsAmt
Group Return For AffiliatesfalseGroupReturnForAffiliatesInd
Organization501c3Yes (X)Organization501c3Ind
Website AddressWWW.NARF.ORGWebsiteAddressTxt
Type Of Organization CorpYes (X)TypeOfOrganizationCorpInd
Formation1970FormationYr
Legal Domicile StateDCLegalDomicileStateCd
Activity Or MissionCONSTRUCT THE FOUNDATIONS NECESSARY TO EMPOWER TRIBES SO THEY CAN CONTINUE TO LIVE ACCORDING TO THEIR NATIVE TRADITIONS, ENFORCE THEIR TREATY RIGHTS AND PROTECT THEIR SOVEREIGNTY.ActivityOrMissionDesc
Voting Members Governing Body13VotingMembersGoverningBodyCnt
Voting Members Independent13VotingMembersIndependentCnt
Total Employee88TotalEmployeeCnt
Total Volunteers20TotalVolunteersCnt
Total Gross UBI$0TotalGrossUBIAmt
Net Unrelated Bus Txbl Incm$0NetUnrelatedBusTxblIncmAmt
PY Contributions Grants$17,939,492PYContributionsGrantsAmt
CY Contributions Grants$20,925,046CYContributionsGrantsAmt
PY Program Service Revenue$757,583PYProgramServiceRevenueAmt
CY Program Service Revenue$1,003,416CYProgramServiceRevenueAmt
PY Investment Income$183,705PYInvestmentIncomeAmt
CY Investment Income$2,611,267CYInvestmentIncomeAmt
PY Other Revenue$56,293PYOtherRevenueAmt
CY Other Revenue$46,411CYOtherRevenueAmt
PY Total Revenue$18,937,073PYTotalRevenueAmt
CY Total Revenue$24,586,140CYTotalRevenueAmt
PY Grants And Similar Paid$1,103,168PYGrantsAndSimilarPaidAmt
CY Grants And Similar Paid$0CYGrantsAndSimilarPaidAmt
PY Benefits Paid To Members$0PYBenefitsPaidToMembersAmt
CY Benefits Paid To Members$0CYBenefitsPaidToMembersAmt
PY Salaries Comp Emp Bnft Paid$10,031,093PYSalariesCompEmpBnftPaidAmt
CY Salaries Comp Emp Bnft Paid$11,965,591CYSalariesCompEmpBnftPaidAmt
PY Total Prof Fndrsng Expns$36,000PYTotalProfFndrsngExpnsAmt
CY Total Prof Fndrsng Expns$33,300CYTotalProfFndrsngExpnsAmt
CY Total Fundraising Expense$3,701,512CYTotalFundraisingExpenseAmt
PY Other Expenses$7,569,879PYOtherExpensesAmt
CY Other Expenses$8,492,321CYOtherExpensesAmt
PY Total Expenses$18,740,140PYTotalExpensesAmt
CY Total Expenses$20,491,212CYTotalExpensesAmt
PY Revenues Less Expenses$196,933PYRevenuesLessExpensesAmt
CY Revenues Less Expenses$4,094,928CYRevenuesLessExpensesAmt
Total Assets BOY$71,353,158TotalAssetsBOYAmt
Total Assets EOY$84,115,280TotalAssetsEOYAmt
Total Liabilities BOY$3,492,645TotalLiabilitiesBOYAmt
Total Liabilities EOY$3,528,328TotalLiabilitiesEOYAmt
Net Assets Or Fund Balances BOY$67,860,513NetAssetsOrFundBalancesBOYAmt
Net Assets Or Fund Balances EOY$80,586,952NetAssetsOrFundBalancesEOYAmt
MissionTHE NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND HOLDS GOVERNMENTS ACCOUNTABLE. WE FIGHT TO PROTECT NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS, RESOURCES, AND LIFEWAYS THROUGH LITIGATION, LEGAL ADVOCACY, AND LEGAL EXPERTISE. AS ESTABLISHED BY NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUND'S (NARF) FIRST BOARD OF DIRECTORS, THE PRIORITIES THAT GUIDE NARF IN ITS MISSIONS STILL CONTINUE TO LEAD NARF TODAY: (1) THE PRESERVATION OF TRIBAL EXISTENCE; (2) THE PROTECTION OF TRIBAL NATURAL RESOURCES; (3) THE PROMOTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS; (4) THE ACCOUNTABILITY OF GOVERNMENTS TO NATIVE AMERICANS; AND (5) THE DEVELOPMENT OF INDIAN LAW AND EDUCATING THE PUBLIC ABOUT INDIAN RIGHTS, LAWS AND ISSUES.MissionDesc
Significant New Program SrvcfalseSignificantNewProgramSrvcInd
Significant ChangefalseSignificantChangeInd
Expense$13,844,446ExpenseAmt
Grant$0GrantAmt
Revenue$1,049,472RevenueAmt
DescSEE SCHEDULE O.Desc

Prog Srvc Accom Acty2 ProgSrvcAccomActy2Grp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Expense$658,441ExpenseAmt
Grant$0GrantAmt
Revenue$0RevenueAmt
DescIn 1972, NARF founded the National Indian Law Library (NILL) to serve the research needs of NARF attorneys. NILL's resources are also available to the public however, and hundreds of research requests are received weekly. The library houses a unique and valuable collection of federal Indian and tribal law materials and provides specialized legal research assistance. It also provides online bulletins to keep advocates aware of the latest legal developments and most recent news in Indian law. Researchers around the world have access to the resources of the National Indian Law Library through online access to our library catalog (https://nill.softlinkliberty.net/liberty). The catalog contains information on over 18,000 titles held in the NILL collection. Copies of most resources can be delivered to researchers in a timely way and many catalog records provide links to free resources that are available on the internet. NILL's collection includes catalog records for approximately 7,000 articles, 4,500 books, and 1400 tribal law resources. Many of these items are freely available online and are easily accessed via a link in the catalog record. NILL is the only library serving the public with extensive expertise and resources relating to Indian law, providing services that other libraries are unable to provide. The NILL website has about 20,000 visitors and 45,000 page visits each month. Using our Indian Law Research Guides (https://www.narf.org/nill/ resources) on topics such as tribal enrollment and indigenous peacemaking, many patrons are able to find answers to their questions on their own. Thanks to coordination with the Colorado State Library, NARF staff can now borrow books and other items from an interlibrary loan system of almost 200 libraries in Colorado and Wyoming. NILL is now able to request books through Prospector, a unified catalog of academic, public, and special libraries in the surrounding area that offers access to 30 million items. THE NATIONAL INDIAN LAW LIBRARY (NILL) IS THE ONLY LAW LIBRARY IN THE UNITED STATES DEVOTED TO AMERICAN INDIAN LAW. THE LIBRARY SERVES BOTH NARF AND MEMBERS OF THE PUBLIC. SINCE IT WAS STARTED AS A NARF PROJECT IN 1972, NILL HAS COLLECTED OVER 19,000 BIBLIOGRAPHIC RESOURCES THAT RELATE TO FEDERAL INDIAN AND TRIBAL LAW. THE LIBRARY'S HOLDINGS INCLUDE THE LARGEST COLLECTION OF TRIBAL CODES, ORDINANCES AND CONSTITUTIONS AVAILABLE; LEGAL PLEADINGS FROM MAJOR INDIAN LAW CASES; AND OFTEN HARD TO FIND REPORTS AND HISTORICAL LEGAL INFORMATION. IN ADDITION TO MAKING ITS CATALOG AND EXTENSIVE COLLECTION AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC, NILL PROVIDES FREE WEEKLY INDIAN LAW UPDATES VIA EMAIL TO OVER 8,000 SUBSCRIBERS AND ANSWERS MORE THAN 100 RESEARCH QUESTIONS EACH MONTH. MOST IMPORTANTLY, NILL SUPPORTS THE RESEARCH NEEDS OF NARF SO THAT IT CAN PROVIDE THE BEST REPRESENTATION TO ITS CLIENTS. THE MISSION OF THE NATIONAL INDIAN LAW LIBRARY'S ACCESS TO TRIBAL LAW PROJECT IS TO ENHANCE THE POWER OF TRIBAL COURTS AND STRENGTHEN TRIBAL SOVEREIGNTY BY PROVIDING TRIBAL LEADERS, LEGAL PRACTITIONERS, AND THE PUBLIC WITH CONVENIENT ACCESS TO CURRENT AND ACCURATE COPIES OF TRIBAL CODES AND CONSTITUTIONS. NILL BEGAN COLLECTING THE LAWS OF TRIBAL NATIONS IN 1988. EVENTUALLY, MUCH OF THE COLLECTION MOVED ONLINE TO THE TRIBAL LAW GATEWAY. NILL'S GOAL IS FOR THE GATEWAY TO PROVIDE ACCESS TO ACCURATE TRIBAL LAW INFORMATION FOR ALL 574 FEDERALLY RECOGNIZED TRIBES, IN THE FORMAT OF THE TRIBE'S CHOOSING.Desc
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Program Service Expenses$14,502,887TotalProgramServiceExpensesAmt
Described In Section501c3Yes (true)DescribedInSection501c3Ind
Schedule B RequiredYes (true)ScheduleBRequiredInd
Political Campaign ActyfalsePoliticalCampaignActyInd
Lobbying ActivitiesYes (true)LobbyingActivitiesInd
Donor Advised FundfalseDonorAdvisedFundInd
Conservation EasementsfalseConservationEasementsInd
Collections Of ArtYes (true)CollectionsOfArtInd
Credit CounselingfalseCreditCounselingInd
Donor Rstr Or Quasi EndowmentsYes (true)DonorRstrOrQuasiEndowmentsInd
Report Land Building EquipmentYes (true)ReportLandBuildingEquipmentInd
Report Investments Other SecYes (true)ReportInvestmentsOtherSecInd
Report Program Related InvstfalseReportProgramRelatedInvstInd
Report Other AssetsfalseReportOtherAssetsInd
Report Other LiabilitiesYes (true)ReportOtherLiabilitiesInd
Include FIN48 FootnotefalseIncludeFIN48FootnoteInd
Independent Audit Fincl StmtYes (true)IndependentAuditFinclStmtInd
Consolidated Audit Fincl StmtfalseConsolidatedAuditFinclStmtInd
School OperatingfalseSchoolOperatingInd
Foreign OfficefalseForeignOfficeInd
Foreign ActivitiesfalseForeignActivitiesInd
More Than5000 K To OrgfalseMoreThan5000KToOrgInd
More Than5000 K To IndividualsfalseMoreThan5000KToIndividualsInd
Professional FundraisingYes (true)ProfessionalFundraisingInd
Fundraising ActivitiesfalseFundraisingActivitiesInd
Gaming ActivitiesfalseGamingActivitiesInd
Operate HospitalfalseOperateHospitalInd
Grants To OrganizationsfalseGrantsToOrganizationsInd
Grants To IndividualsfalseGrantsToIndividualsInd
Schedule J RequiredYes (true)ScheduleJRequiredInd
Tax Exempt BondsfalseTaxExemptBondsInd
Engaged In Excess Benefit TransfalseEngagedInExcessBenefitTransInd
PY Excess Benefit TransfalsePYExcessBenefitTransInd
Loan OutstandingfalseLoanOutstandingInd
Grant To Related PersonfalseGrantToRelatedPersonInd
Business Rln With Org MemfalseBusinessRlnWithOrgMemInd
Business Rln With Fam MemfalseBusinessRlnWithFamMemInd
Business Rln With35 Ctrl EntfalseBusinessRlnWith35CtrlEntInd
Deductible Non Cash ContriYes (true)DeductibleNonCashContriInd
Deductible Art ContributionfalseDeductibleArtContributionInd
Terminate OperationsfalseTerminateOperationsInd
Partial LiquidationfalsePartialLiquidationInd
Disregarded EntityfalseDisregardedEntityInd
Related EntityfalseRelatedEntityInd
Related Organization Ctrl EntfalseRelatedOrganizationCtrlEntInd
Trnsfr Exmpt Non Chrtbl Rltd OrgfalseTrnsfrExmptNonChrtblRltdOrgInd
Activities Conducted PrtshpfalseActivitiesConductedPrtshpInd
Schedule O RequiredYes (true)ScheduleORequiredInd
IRP Document106IRPDocumentCnt
IRP Document W2 G0IRPDocumentW2GCnt
Employee88EmployeeCnt
Employment Tax Returns FiledYes (true)EmploymentTaxReturnsFiledInd
Unrelated Bus Incm Over LimitfalseUnrelatedBusIncmOverLimitInd
Foreign Financial AccountfalseForeignFinancialAccountInd
Prohibited Tax Shelter TransfalseProhibitedTaxShelterTransInd
Taxable Party NotificationfalseTaxablePartyNotificationInd
Nondeductible ContributionsfalseNondeductibleContributionsInd
Quid Pro Quo ContributionsfalseQuidProQuoContributionsInd
Form8282 Property Disposed OffalseForm8282PropertyDisposedOfInd
Rcv Fnds To Pay Prsnl Bnft CntrctfalseRcvFndsToPayPrsnlBnftCntrctInd
Pay Premiums Prsnl Bnft CntrctfalsePayPremiumsPrsnlBnftCntrctInd
Indoor Tanning ServicesfalseIndoorTanningServicesInd
Subj To Tax Rmnrtn Ex Prcht PymtfalseSubjToTaxRmnrtnExPrchtPymtInd
Subject To Excs Tax Net Invst IncfalseSubjectToExcsTaxNetInvstIncInd
Info In Schedule O Part VIYes (X)InfoInScheduleOPartVIInd
Governing Body Voting Members13GoverningBodyVotingMembersCnt
Independent Voting Member13IndependentVotingMemberCnt
Family Or Business RlnfalseFamilyOrBusinessRlnInd
Delegation Of Mgmt DutiesfalseDelegationOfMgmtDutiesInd
Change To Org DocumentsfalseChangeToOrgDocumentsInd
Material Diversion Or MisusefalseMaterialDiversionOrMisuseInd
Members Or StockholdersfalseMembersOrStockholdersInd
Election Of Board MembersfalseElectionOfBoardMembersInd
Decisions Subject To ApprovafalseDecisionsSubjectToApprovaInd
Minutes Of Governing BodyYes (true)MinutesOfGoverningBodyInd
Minutes Of CommitteesYes (true)MinutesOfCommitteesInd
Officer Mailing AddressfalseOfficerMailingAddressInd
Local ChaptersfalseLocalChaptersInd
Form990 Provided To Gvrn BodyYes (true)Form990ProvidedToGvrnBodyInd
Conflict Of Interest PolicyYes (true)ConflictOfInterestPolicyInd
Annual Disclosure Covered PrsnYes (true)AnnualDisclosureCoveredPrsnInd
Regular Monitoring EnfrcYes (true)RegularMonitoringEnfrcInd
Whistleblower PolicyYes (true)WhistleblowerPolicyInd
Document Retention PolicyYes (true)DocumentRetentionPolicyInd
Compensation Process CEOYes (true)CompensationProcessCEOInd
Compensation Process OtherYes (true)CompensationProcessOtherInd
Investment In Joint VenturefalseInvestmentInJointVentureInd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldALStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldAKStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldAZStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldARStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldCAStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldCOStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldCTStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldDEStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldFLStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldGAStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldHIStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldIDStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldILStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldINStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldIAStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldKSStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldKYStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldLAStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldMEStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldMDStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldMAStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldMIStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldMNStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldMSStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldMOStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldMTStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldNEStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldNVStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldNHStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldNJStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldNMStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldNYStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldNCStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldNDStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldOHStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldOKStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldORStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldPAStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldRIStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldSCStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldSDStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldTNStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldTXStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldUTStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldVTStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldVAStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldWAStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldWVStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldWIStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldWYStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
Own WebsiteYes (X)OwnWebsiteInd
Upon RequestYes (X)UponRequestInd

Books In Care Of Detail BooksInCareOfDetail

Business Name BusinessName

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1NATIVE AMERICAN RIGHTS FUNDBusinessNameLine1Txt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Phone3034478760PhoneNum

US Address USAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line1250 ARAPAHOE AVENUEAddressLine1Txt
CityBOULDERCityNm
State AbbreviationCOStateAbbreviationCd
ZIP803025821ZIPCd

Form990 Part VII Section A Form990PartVIISectionAGrp (24 entries)

TitleTitleTxtAverage Hours Per WeekAverageHoursPerWeekRtAverage Hours Per Week Rltd OrgAverageHoursPerWeekRltdOrgRtIndividual Trustee Or DirectorIndividualTrusteeOrDirectorIndOfficerOfficerIndReportable Comp From OrgReportableCompFromOrgAmtReportable Comp From Rltd OrgReportableCompFromRltdOrgAmtOther CompensationOtherCompensationAmtHighest Compensated EmployeeHighestCompensatedEmployeeInd
KENNETH KAHN
VICE-CHAIRMAN1.00.0Yes (X)Yes (X)$0$0$0
LACEY HORN
CHAIRWOMAN1.00.0Yes (X)Yes (X)$0$0$0
CAMILLE KALAMA
BOARD MEMBER1.00.0Yes (X)$0$0$0
GAYLA HOSETH
BOARD MEMBER1.00.0Yes (X)$0$0$0
GEOFFREY BLACKWELL
BOARD MEMBER1.00.0Yes (X)$0$0$0
JAMIE AZURE
BOARD MEMBER1.00.0Yes (X)$0$0$0
LORI STINSON
BOARD MEMBER1.00.0Yes (X)$0$0$0
LOUIE UNGARO
BOARD MEMBER1.00.0Yes (X)$0$0$0
MICHAEL PETOSKEY
BOARD MEMBER1.00.0Yes (X)$0$0$0
REBECCA CROOKS-STRATTON
BOARD MEMBER1.00.0Yes (X)$0$0$0
REBECCA MILES
BOARD MEMBER1.00.0Yes (X)$0$0$0
RHONDA PITKA
BOARD MEMBER1.00.0Yes (X)$0$0$0
ROBERT MIGUEL
BOARD MEMBER1.00.0Yes (X)$0$0$0
STEPHANIE BRYAN
BOARD MEMBER - END 5/3/20241.00.0Yes (X)$0$0$0
DONALD RAGONA
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR40.00.0Yes (X)$190,025$0$44,701
JOHN ECHOHAWK
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR40.00.0Yes (X)$293,898$0$34,614
MATTHEW CAMPBELL
DEPUTY DIRECTOR40.00.0Yes (X)$254,728$0$37,451
MICHAEL KENNEDY
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER40.00.0Yes (X)$202,447$0$41,016
SARAH TRUJILLO PALACIOS
CORPORATE SECRETARY40.00.0Yes (X)$143,532$0$29,998
BRETT SHELTON
ATTORNEY40.00.0$256,985$0$28,876Yes (X)
DAVID GOVER
ATTORNEY40.00.0$244,022$0$39,802Yes (X)
KIM GOTTSCHALK
ATTORNEY40.00.0$256,526$0$43,604Yes (X)
MELODY MCCOY
ATTORNEY40.00.0$244,258$0$59,713Yes (X)
SUSAN NOE
ATTORNEY40.00.0$258,337$0$28,255Yes (X)
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Reportable Comp From Org$2,344,758TotalReportableCompFromOrgAmt
Tot Reportable Comp Rltd Org$0TotReportableCompRltdOrgAmt
Total Other Compensation$388,030TotalOtherCompensationAmt
Indiv Rcvd Greater Than100 K41IndivRcvdGreaterThan100KCnt
Former Ofcr Employees ListedfalseFormerOfcrEmployeesListedInd
Total Comp Greater Than150 KYes (true)TotalCompGreaterThan150KInd
Compensation From Other SrcsfalseCompensationFromOtherSrcsInd

Contractor Compensation ContractorCompensationGrp (5 entries)

Address Line1ContractorAddress/USAddress/AddressLine1TxtCityContractorAddress/USAddress/CityNmState AbbreviationContractorAddress/USAddress/StateAbbreviationCdZIPContractorAddress/USAddress/ZIPCdServicesServicesDescCompensationCompensationAmt
AP MOUNTAIN STATES LLC
797 VENTURA STREETAURORACO80011CONSTRUCTION$1,591,463
CLASS EXPERTS GROUP
740 WEST GLEN OAKS LANEMILWAUKEEWI53092SETTLEMENT ADMINISTRATION$345,972
SALT LLC
645 G STREET SUITE 301ANCHORAGEAK99501PROJECT MANAGEMENT$245,187
JEMAL'S ATLANTIC LLC
P O BOX 714435CINCINNATIOH452714435RENT$234,436
IES COMMUNICATIONS LLC
2801 SOUTH FAIR LANETEMPEAZ85282IT & AV$127,155
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Cntrct Rcvd Greater Than100 K8CntrctRcvdGreaterThan100KCnt
Federated Campaigns$7,098FederatedCampaignsAmt
Government Grants$1,247,850GovernmentGrantsAmt
All Other Contributions$19,670,098AllOtherContributionsAmt
Noncash Contributions$32,407NoncashContributionsAmt
Total Contributions$20,925,046TotalContributionsAmt

Program Service Revenue ProgramServiceRevenueGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
DescLEGAL FEESDesc
Business541110BusinessCd
Total Revenue Column$1,003,416TotalRevenueColumnAmt
Related Or Exempt Func Income$1,003,416RelatedOrExemptFuncIncomeAmt

Total Oth Program Service Rev TotalOthProgramServiceRevGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Revenue Column$0TotalRevenueColumnAmt
Related Or Exempt Func Income$0RelatedOrExemptFuncIncomeAmt
Unrelated Business Revenue$0UnrelatedBusinessRevenueAmt
Exclusion$0ExclusionAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Program Service Revenue$1,003,416TotalProgramServiceRevenueAmt

Investment Income InvestmentIncomeGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Revenue Column$1,596,382TotalRevenueColumnAmt
Exclusion$1,596,382ExclusionAmt

Royalties Revenue RoyaltiesRevenueGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Revenue Column$355TotalRevenueColumnAmt
Exclusion$355ExclusionAmt

Rental Income Or Loss RentalIncomeOrLossGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Real$0RealAmt
Personal$0PersonalAmt

Gross Amount Sales Assets GrossAmountSalesAssetsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Securities$10,491,750SecuritiesAmt

Less Cost Oth Basis Sales Expnss LessCostOthBasisSalesExpnssGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Securities$9,476,865SecuritiesAmt

Gain Or Loss GainOrLossGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Securities$1,014,885SecuritiesAmt
Other$0OtherAmt

Net Gain Or Loss Investments NetGainOrLossInvestmentsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Revenue Column$1,014,885TotalRevenueColumnAmt
Exclusion$1,014,885ExclusionAmt

Other Revenue Misc OtherRevenueMiscGrp (3 entries)

DescDescBusinessBusinessCdTotal Revenue ColumnTotalRevenueColumnAmtRelated Or Exempt Func IncomeRelatedOrExemptFuncIncomeAmt
HONORARIUMS900099$27,361$27,361
REIMBURSEMENTS900099$11,279$11,279
OTHER MISC REVENUE900099$7,416$7,416

Miscellaneous Revenue MiscellaneousRevenueGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Revenue Column$0TotalRevenueColumnAmt
Related Or Exempt Func Income$0RelatedOrExemptFuncIncomeAmt
Unrelated Business Revenue$0UnrelatedBusinessRevenueAmt
Exclusion$0ExclusionAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Other Revenue Total$46,056OtherRevenueTotalAmt

Total Revenue TotalRevenueGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Revenue Column$24,586,140TotalRevenueColumnAmt
Related Or Exempt Func Income$1,049,472RelatedOrExemptFuncIncomeAmt
Unrelated Business Revenue$0UnrelatedBusinessRevenueAmt
Exclusion$2,611,622ExclusionAmt

Benefits To Members BenefitsToMembersGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$0TotalAmt
Program Services$0ProgramServicesAmt

Comp Current Ofcr Directors CompCurrentOfcrDirectorsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$1,325,066TotalAmt
Program Services$546,495ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$479,165ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$299,406FundraisingAmt

Other Salaries And Wages OtherSalariesAndWagesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$8,626,699TotalAmt
Program Services$7,258,625ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$661,958ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$706,116FundraisingAmt

Pension Plan Contributions PensionPlanContributionsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$404,775TotalAmt
Program Services$347,817ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$22,286ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$34,672FundraisingAmt

Other Employee Benefits OtherEmployeeBenefitsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$967,631TotalAmt
Program Services$820,057ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$31,513ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$116,061FundraisingAmt

Payroll Taxes PayrollTaxesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$641,420TotalAmt
Program Services$455,121ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$95,121ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$91,178FundraisingAmt

Fees For Services Legal FeesForServicesLegalGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$1,009,135TotalAmt
Program Services$994,895ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$14,240ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Fees For Services Accounting FeesForServicesAccountingGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$34,625TotalAmt
Management And General$34,625ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Fees For Services Prof Fundraising FeesForServicesProfFundraising

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$33,300TotalAmt
Fundraising$33,300FundraisingAmt

Fees For Srvc Invst Mgmnt Fees FeesForSrvcInvstMgmntFeesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$383,057TotalAmt
Management And General$383,057ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Fees For Services Other FeesForServicesOtherGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$1,083,333TotalAmt
Program Services$1,083,333ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$0ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$0FundraisingAmt

Advertising AdvertisingGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$445TotalAmt
Fundraising$445FundraisingAmt

Office Expenses OfficeExpensesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$906,448TotalAmt
Program Services$494,780ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$166,771ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$244,897FundraisingAmt

Information Technology InformationTechnologyGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$440,600TotalAmt
Program Services$169,597ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$161,732ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$109,271FundraisingAmt

Occupancy OccupancyGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$851,885TotalAmt
Program Services$725,853ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$79,092ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$46,940FundraisingAmt

Travel TravelGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$862,513TotalAmt
Program Services$642,173ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$97,007ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$123,333FundraisingAmt

Conferences Meetings ConferencesMeetingsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$22,493TotalAmt
Program Services$17,538ProgramServicesAmt
Fundraising$4,955FundraisingAmt

Interest InterestGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$14,855TotalAmt
Management And General$14,855ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Depreciation Depletion DepreciationDepletionGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$427,344TotalAmt
Program Services$308,219ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$40,459ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$78,666FundraisingAmt

Insurance InsuranceGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$54,203TotalAmt
Program Services$48,425ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$3,673ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$2,105FundraisingAmt

Other Expenses OtherExpensesGrp (3 entries)

DescDescTotalTotalAmtProgram ServicesProgramServicesAmtFundraisingFundraisingAmtManagement And GeneralManagementAndGeneralAmt
MAILING, PRINTING & PRODUCTION EXPENSES$2,211,578$408,042$1,803,536
LIBRARY$164,729$156,839$6,631$1,259
CLIENT CASES LITIGATION EXPENSES$25,078$25,078

All Other Expenses AllOtherExpensesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$0TotalAmt
Program Services$0ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$0ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$0FundraisingAmt

Total Functional Expenses TotalFunctionalExpensesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$20,491,212TotalAmt
Program Services$14,502,887ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$2,286,813ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$3,701,512FundraisingAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Joint CostsYes (X)JointCostsInd

Total Joint Costs TotalJointCostsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$1,165,834TotalAmt
Program Services$408,042ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$0ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$757,792FundraisingAmt

Cash Non Interest Bearing CashNonInterestBearingGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$6,841,033BOYAmt
EOY$3,053,102EOYAmt

Savings And Temp Cash Invst SavingsAndTempCashInvstGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$3,099,408BOYAmt
EOY$776,165EOYAmt

Pledges And Grants Receivable PledgesAndGrantsReceivableGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$3,211,834BOYAmt
EOY$7,478,868EOYAmt

Accounts Receivable AccountsReceivableGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$236,176BOYAmt
EOY$258,665EOYAmt

Receivables From Officers Etc ReceivablesFromOfficersEtcGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$0BOYAmt
EOY$0EOYAmt

Rcvbl From Disqualified Prsn RcvblFromDisqualifiedPrsnGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$0BOYAmt
EOY$0EOYAmt

Prepaid Expenses Defrd Charges PrepaidExpensesDefrdChargesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$422,918BOYAmt
EOY$447,753EOYAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Land Bldg Equip Cost Or Other Bss$13,268,618LandBldgEquipCostOrOtherBssAmt
Land Bldg Equip Accum Deprec$1,341,836LandBldgEquipAccumDeprecAmt

Land Bldg Equip Basis Net LandBldgEquipBasisNetGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$12,068,905BOYAmt
EOY$11,926,782EOYAmt

Investments Pub Traded Sec InvestmentsPubTradedSecGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$38,265,280BOYAmt
EOY$51,333,988EOYAmt

Investments Other Securities InvestmentsOtherSecuritiesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$5,536,904BOYAmt
EOY$7,372,449EOYAmt

Investments Program Related InvestmentsProgramRelatedGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$0BOYAmt

Other Assets Total OtherAssetsTotalGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$1,670,700BOYAmt
EOY$1,467,508EOYAmt

Total Assets TotalAssetsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$71,353,158BOYAmt
EOY$84,115,280EOYAmt

Accounts Payable Accr Expnss AccountsPayableAccrExpnssGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$1,437,805BOYAmt
EOY$1,640,908EOYAmt

Loans From Officers Directors LoansFromOfficersDirectorsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$0BOYAmt
EOY$0EOYAmt

Mortg Notes Pybl Scrd Invst Prop MortgNotesPyblScrdInvstPropGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$6,799BOYAmt
EOY$58,885EOYAmt

Other Liabilities OtherLiabilitiesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$2,048,041BOYAmt
EOY$1,828,535EOYAmt

Total Liabilities TotalLiabilitiesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$3,492,645BOYAmt
EOY$3,528,328EOYAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Organization Follows FASB117Yes (X)OrganizationFollowsFASB117Ind

No Donor Restriction Net Assets NoDonorRestrictionNetAssetsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$61,486,304BOYAmt
EOY$70,051,126EOYAmt

Donor Restriction Net Assets DonorRestrictionNetAssetsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$6,374,209BOYAmt
EOY$10,535,826EOYAmt

Total Net Assets Fund Balance TotalNetAssetsFundBalanceGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$67,860,513BOYAmt
EOY$80,586,952EOYAmt

Tot Liab Net Assets Fund Balance TotLiabNetAssetsFundBalanceGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$71,353,158BOYAmt
EOY$84,115,280EOYAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Reconcilation Revenue Expnss$4,094,928ReconcilationRevenueExpnssAmt
Net Unrlzd Gains Losses Invst$8,631,511NetUnrlzdGainsLossesInvstAmt
Other Changes In Net Assets$0OtherChangesInNetAssetsAmt
Method Of Accounting AccrualYes (X)MethodOfAccountingAccrualInd
Accountant Compile Or ReviewfalseAccountantCompileOrReviewInd
FS AuditedYes (true)FSAuditedInd

FS Audited Basis FSAuditedBasisGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Separate Basis Fincl StmtYes (X)SeparateBasisFinclStmtInd
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Audit CommitteeYes (true)AuditCommitteeInd
Federal Grant Audit RequiredfalseFederalGrantAuditRequiredInd

Schedule A IRS990ScheduleA

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Public Organization170Yes (X)PublicOrganization170Ind

Gifts Grants Contri Rcvd170 GiftsGrantsContriRcvd170Grp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Tax Year Minus4 Years$12,901,033CurrentTaxYearMinus4YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus3 Years$17,314,327CurrentTaxYearMinus3YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus2 Years$14,822,919CurrentTaxYearMinus2YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus1 Year$17,939,492CurrentTaxYearMinus1YearAmt
Current Tax Year$20,925,046CurrentTaxYearAmt
Total$83,902,817TotalAmt

Tax Rev Levied Orgnztnl Bnft170 TaxRevLeviedOrgnztnlBnft170Grp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$0TotalAmt

Govt Furn Srvc Fclts Vl170 GovtFurnSrvcFcltsVl170Grp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$0TotalAmt

Total Calendar Year170 TotalCalendarYear170Grp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Tax Year Minus4 Years$12,901,033CurrentTaxYearMinus4YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus3 Years$17,314,327CurrentTaxYearMinus3YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus2 Years$14,822,919CurrentTaxYearMinus2YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus1 Year$17,939,492CurrentTaxYearMinus1YearAmt
Current Tax Year$20,925,046CurrentTaxYearAmt
Total$83,902,817TotalAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Substantial Contributors Tot$7,289,650SubstantialContributorsTotAmt
Public Support Total170$76,613,167PublicSupportTotal170Amt

Gross Investment Income170 GrossInvestmentIncome170Grp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Tax Year Minus4 Years$1,476,662CurrentTaxYearMinus4YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus3 Years$1,537,528CurrentTaxYearMinus3YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus2 Years$1,132,902CurrentTaxYearMinus2YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus1 Year$1,274,389CurrentTaxYearMinus1YearAmt
Current Tax Year$1,596,737CurrentTaxYearAmt
Total$7,018,218TotalAmt

Unrelated Business Net Incm170 UnrelatedBusinessNetIncm170Grp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$0TotalAmt

Other Income170 OtherIncome170Grp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Tax Year Minus4 Years$0CurrentTaxYearMinus4YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus3 Years$0CurrentTaxYearMinus3YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus2 Years$0CurrentTaxYearMinus2YearsAmt
Current Tax Year Minus1 Year$0CurrentTaxYearMinus1YearAmt
Current Tax Year$0CurrentTaxYearAmt
Total$0TotalAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Support$90,921,035TotalSupportAmt
Gross Receipts Rltd Activities$0GrossReceiptsRltdActivitiesAmt
Public Support CY1700.8426PublicSupportCY170Pct
Public Support PY1700.8390PublicSupportPY170Pct
Thirty Thr Pct Suprt Tests CY170Yes (X)ThirtyThrPctSuprtTestsCY170Ind

Schedule B IRS990ScheduleB

Contributor Information ContributorInformationGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
ContributorRESTRICTEDContributorNum

Contributor Business Name ContributorBusinessName

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1RESTRICTEDBusinessNameLine1

Contributor US Address ContributorUSAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line1RESTRICTEDAddressLine1
Address Line2RESTRICTEDAddressLine2
CityRESTRICTEDCity
StateRESTRICTEDState
ZIP CodeRESTRICTEDZIPCode
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total ContributionsRESTRICTEDTotalContributionsAmt

Schedule C IRS990ScheduleC

Total Grassroots Lobbying TotalGrassrootsLobbyingGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Filing Organizations Total$1,592FilingOrganizationsTotalAmt

Total Direct Lobbying TotalDirectLobbyingGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Filing Organizations Total$15,512FilingOrganizationsTotalAmt

Total Lobbying Expend TotalLobbyingExpendGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Filing Organizations Total$17,104FilingOrganizationsTotalAmt

Other Exempt Purpose Expend OtherExemptPurposeExpendGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Filing Organizations Total$20,474,108FilingOrganizationsTotalAmt

Total Exempt Purpose Expend TotalExemptPurposeExpendGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Filing Organizations Total$20,491,212FilingOrganizationsTotalAmt

Lobbying Nontaxable Amount LobbyingNontaxableAmountGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Filing Organizations Total$1,000,000FilingOrganizationsTotalAmt
Affiliated Group Total$0AffiliatedGroupTotalAmt

Grassroots Nontaxable GrassrootsNontaxableGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Filing Organizations Total$250,000FilingOrganizationsTotalAmt

Tot Lbbyng Grassroot Mns Non Tx TotLbbyngGrassrootMnsNonTxGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Filing Organizations Total$0FilingOrganizationsTotalAmt

Tot Lbby Expend Mns Lbbyng Non Tx TotLbbyExpendMnsLbbyngNonTxGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Filing Organizations Total$0FilingOrganizationsTotalAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Form4720 FiledfalseForm4720FiledInd

Avg Lobbying Nontaxable Amount AvgLobbyingNontaxableAmountGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Year Minus3$855,853CurrentYearMinus3Amt
Current Year Minus2$877,081CurrentYearMinus2Amt
Current Year Minus1$1,000,000CurrentYearMinus1Amt
Current Year$1,000,000CurrentYearAmt
Total$3,732,934TotalAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Lobbying Ceiling$5,599,401LobbyingCeilingAmt

Avg Total Lobbying Expend AvgTotalLobbyingExpendGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Year Minus3$110,581CurrentYearMinus3Amt
Current Year Minus2$139,660CurrentYearMinus2Amt
Current Year Minus1$56,540CurrentYearMinus1Amt
Current Year$17,104CurrentYearAmt
Total$323,885TotalAmt

Avg Grassroots Nontaxable AvgGrassrootsNontaxableGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Year Minus3$213,963CurrentYearMinus3Amt
Current Year Minus2$219,270CurrentYearMinus2Amt
Current Year Minus1$250,000CurrentYearMinus1Amt
Current Year$250,000CurrentYearAmt
Total$933,233TotalAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Grassroots Ceiling$1,399,850GrassrootsCeilingAmt

Avg Grassroots Lobbying Expend AvgGrassrootsLobbyingExpendGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Current Year Minus3$1,026CurrentYearMinus3Amt
Current Year Minus2$3,662CurrentYearMinus2Amt
Current Year Minus1$2,287CurrentYearMinus1Amt
Current Year$1,592CurrentYearAmt
Total$8,567TotalAmt

Schedule D IRS990ScheduleD

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Coll Used Scholarly RsrchYes (X)CollUsedScholarlyRsrchInd

Collection Used Other Purposes CollectionUsedOtherPurposesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Collection Used Other PurposesYes (X)CollectionUsedOtherPurposesInd
Other PurposesASSIST IN RESEARCH - CLIENT CASESOtherPurposesDesc
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Solicited Assets SalefalseSolicitedAssetsSaleInd

CY Endwmt Fund CYEndwmtFundGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Beginning Year Balance$31,068,058BeginningYearBalanceAmt
Contributions$107,749ContributionsAmt
End Year Balance$31,175,807EndYearBalanceAmt

CY Minus1 Yr Endwmt Fund CYMinus1YrEndwmtFundGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Beginning Year Balance$31,061,234BeginningYearBalanceAmt
Contributions$6,824ContributionsAmt
End Year Balance$31,068,058EndYearBalanceAmt

CY Minus2 Yr Endwmt Fund CYMinus2YrEndwmtFundGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Beginning Year Balance$26,053,835BeginningYearBalanceAmt
Contributions$5,007,399ContributionsAmt
End Year Balance$31,061,234EndYearBalanceAmt

CY Minus3 Yr Endwmt Fund CYMinus3YrEndwmtFundGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Beginning Year Balance$26,041,891BeginningYearBalanceAmt
Contributions$11,944ContributionsAmt
End Year Balance$26,053,835EndYearBalanceAmt

CY Minus4 Yr Endwmt Fund CYMinus4YrEndwmtFundGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Beginning Year Balance$26,034,947BeginningYearBalanceAmt
Contributions$6,944ContributionsAmt
End Year Balance$26,041,891EndYearBalanceAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Board Designated Balance EOY0.9623BoardDesignatedBalanceEOYPct
Prmnnt Endowment Balance EOY0.0377PrmnntEndowmentBalanceEOYPct
Term Endowment Balance EOY0.0TermEndowmentBalanceEOYPct
Endowments Held Unrelated OrgfalseEndowmentsHeldUnrelatedOrgInd
Endowments Held Related OrgfalseEndowmentsHeldRelatedOrgInd

Land LandGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Other Cost Or Other Basis$3,570,000OtherCostOrOtherBasisAmt
Book Value$3,570,000BookValueAmt

Buildings BuildingsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Other Cost Or Other Basis$8,022,273OtherCostOrOtherBasisAmt
Depreciation$678,866DepreciationAmt
Book Value$7,343,407BookValueAmt

Equipment EquipmentGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Other Cost Or Other Basis$1,595,461OtherCostOrOtherBasisAmt
Depreciation$638,222DepreciationAmt
Book Value$957,239BookValueAmt

Other Land Buildings OtherLandBuildingsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Other Cost Or Other Basis$80,884OtherCostOrOtherBasisAmt
Depreciation$24,748DepreciationAmt
Book Value$56,136BookValueAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Book Value Land Buildings$11,926,782TotalBookValueLandBuildingsAmt

Other Securities OtherSecuritiesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
DescPRIVATE EQUITYDesc
Book Value$7,372,449BookValueAmt
Method ValuationFMethodValuationCd
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Book Value Securities$7,372,449TotalBookValueSecuritiesAmt

Other Liabilities Org OtherLiabilitiesOrgGrp (2 entries)

DescDescAmtAmt
OPERATING LEASE LIABILITY$1,486,992
RETIREMENT OBLIGATION$341,543
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Liability$1,828,535TotalLiabilityAmt
Total Rev Etc Audited Fincl Stmt$32,834,594TotalRevEtcAuditedFinclStmtAmt
Net Unrealized Gains Invst$8,631,511NetUnrealizedGainsInvstAmt
Other Revenue$0OtherRevenueAmt
Revenue Not Reported$8,631,511RevenueNotReportedAmt
Revenue Subtotal$24,203,083RevenueSubtotalAmt
Investment Expenses Not Incld$383,057InvestmentExpensesNotIncldAmt
Other Revenues Not Included$0OtherRevenuesNotIncludedAmt
Revenue Not Reported Fincl Stmt$383,057RevenueNotReportedFinclStmtAmt
Total Revenue Per Form990$24,586,140TotalRevenuePerForm990Amt
Tot Expns Etc Audited Fincl Stmt$20,108,155TotExpnsEtcAuditedFinclStmtAmt
Other Expenses Included$0OtherExpensesIncludedAmt
Expenses Not Reported$0ExpensesNotReportedAmt
Expenses Subtotal$20,108,155ExpensesSubtotalAmt
Investment Expenses Not Incld2$383,057InvestmentExpensesNotIncld2Amt
Other Expenses Not Included$0OtherExpensesNotIncludedAmt
Expenses Not Rpt Fincl Stmt$383,057ExpensesNotRptFinclStmtAmt
Total Expenses Per Form990$20,491,212TotalExpensesPerForm990Amt

Supplemental Information Detail SupplementalInformationDetail (3 entries)

Form And Line ReferenceFormAndLineReferenceDescExplanationExplanationTxt
Schedule D, Part III, Line 1a Collections of art - financial statement footnoteIF ELECTED UNDER SFAS 116 PROVIDE FOOTNOTE FROM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: COLLECTIONS OF WORKS OF ART, HISTORICAL TREASURES, AND SIMILAR ASSETS ARE NOT CAPITALIZED IN AS MUCH AS THE ITEMS ARE PRESERVED AND CARED FOR CONTINUOUSLY. PURCHASES OF COLLECTION ITEMS ARE REPORTED IN THE YEAR OF ACQUISITION AS DECREASES IN UNRESTRICTED NET ASSETS, OR IN TEMPORARILY OR PERMANENTLY RESTRICTED NET ASSETS IF THE ASSETS USED TO PURCHASE THE ITEMS WERE RESTRICTED TO THAT USE BY DONOR STIPULATION. CONTRIBUTIONS OF COLLECTION ITEMS ARE NOT REPORTED IN THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. PROCEEDS FROM DISPOSAL OF AND INSURANCE RECOVERIES RELATED TO COLLECTION ITEMS ARE REPORTED AS INCREASES IN THE APPROPRIATE NET ASSET CLASSES. NARF'S COLLECTIONS CONSIST OF RARE BOOKS AND MAPS. THESE COLLECTIONS ARE HELD FOR EDUCATIONAL AND RESEARCH PURPOSES. THEY ARE SUBJECT TO A POLICY THAT REQUIRES PROCEEDS FROM THE DISPOSITION OF COLLECTION ITEMS TO BE USED TO ACQUIRE OTHER COLLECTION ITEMS. NO COLLECTION ITEMS WERE SOLD OR REMOVED IN 2024 AND 2023.
Schedule D, Part III, Line 4 Collections of art - description of collectionsDESCRIPTION OF COLLECTIONS AND HOW THEY FURTHER THE EXEMPT PURPOSE: COLLECTIONS CONSIST OF RARE BOOKS AND MAPS. THESE COLLECTIONS ARE HELD FOR EDUCATIONAL AND RESEARCH PURPOSES, WHICH ARE USED IN TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE AND EDUCATING THE PUBLIC ABOUT INDIAN RIGHTS, LAWS, AND ISSUES.
Schedule D, Part V, Line 4 Intended uses of endowment fundsDESCRIBE THE INTENDED USES OF THE ORGANIZATION'S ENDOWMENT FUNDS: THE ENDOWMENT ASSETS INCLUDE DONOR-RESTRICTED ENDOWMENT FUNDS HELD IN PERPETUITY OR FOR DONOR-SPECIFIED PERIODS AND A BOARD-DESIGNATED ENDOWMENT, TITLED FUTURE LEGAL ADVOCACY FUND, FOR FUTURE COSTS ASSOCIATED WITH REPRESENTATION OF TRIBES AND NATIVE ORGANIZATIONS WHO DO NOT HAVE THE RESOURCES TO PAY FOR THE COSTS OF PREPARING FOR PROTRACTED LITIGATION. RETURNS GENERATED BY THE ENDOWMENT ASSETS ARE UNRESTRICTED IN ACCORDANCE WITH DONOR STIPULATIONS AND ARE USED TO SUPPORT PROGRAMS AND SUPPORTING OPERATIONS.

Schedule G IRS990ScheduleG

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Mail SolicitationsYes (X)MailSolicitationsInd
Email SolicitationsYes (X)EmailSolicitationsInd
In Person SolicitationsYes (X)InPersonSolicitationsInd
Solicitation Of Non Govt GrantsYes (X)SolicitationOfNonGovtGrantsInd
Solicitation Of Govt GrantsYes (X)SolicitationOfGovtGrantsInd
Agrmt Prof Fundraising ActyYes (true)AgrmtProfFundraisingActyInd

Fundraiser Activity Info FundraiserActivityInfoGrp

Organization Business Name OrganizationBusinessName

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1INNOVAIRRE STUDIOS INCBusinessNameLine1Txt

US Address USAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line12 EXECUTIVE CAMPUS SUITE 200AddressLine1Txt
CityCHERRY HILLCityNm
State AbbreviationNJStateAbbreviationCd
ZIP08002ZIPCd
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
ActivityDIRECT MAILActivityTxt
Fundraiser Control Of FundsfalseFundraiserControlOfFundsInd
Gross Receipts$3,717,662GrossReceiptsAmt
Retained By Contractor$33,300RetainedByContractorAmt
Net To Organization$3,684,362NetToOrganizationAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Gross Receipts$3,717,662TotalGrossReceiptsAmt
Total Retained By Contractors$33,300TotalRetainedByContractorsAmt
Total Net To Organization$3,684,362TotalNetToOrganizationAmt
Licensed StatesALLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesAKLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesAZLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesARLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesCALicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesCOLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesCTLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesDELicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesFLLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesGALicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesHILicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesIDLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesILLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesINLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesIALicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesKSLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesKYLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesLALicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesMELicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesMDLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesMALicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesMILicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesMNLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesMSLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesMOLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesMTLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesNELicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesNVLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesNHLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesNJLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesNMLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesNYLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesNCLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesNDLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesOHLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesOKLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesORLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesPALicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesRILicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesSCLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesSDLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesTNLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesTXLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesUTLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesVTLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesVALicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesWALicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesWVLicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesWILicensedStatesCd
Licensed StatesWYLicensedStatesCd

Supplemental Information Detail SupplementalInformationDetail

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Form And Line ReferenceSchedule G, Part I, Line 2b(v) payment of fees or payment of expensesFormAndLineReferenceDesc
ExplanationINNOVAIRRE STUDIOS INC-SCHEDULE G, PART I: PAYMENTS FOR PRODUCTION EXPENSES (SUCH AS PRINTING AND POSTAGE) TO INNOVAIRRE STUDIOS WERE MADE SEPARATELY FROM FUNDRAISING FEES. TOTAL PRODUCTION EXPENSES AMOUNTED TO $2,211,578 FOR THE YEAR.;ExplanationTxt

Schedule J IRS990ScheduleJ

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Independent ConsultantYes (X)IndependentConsultantInd
Written Employment ContractYes (X)WrittenEmploymentContractInd
Compensation SurveyYes (X)CompensationSurveyInd
Board Or Committee ApprovalYes (X)BoardOrCommitteeApprovalInd
Severance PaymentfalseSeverancePaymentInd
Supplemental Nonqual Rtr PlanYes (true)SupplementalNonqualRtrPlanInd
Equity Based Comp ArrngmfalseEquityBasedCompArrngmInd
Comp Based On Revenue Of Flng OrgfalseCompBasedOnRevenueOfFlngOrgInd
Comp Bsd On Rev Related OrgsfalseCompBsdOnRevRelatedOrgsInd
Comp Bsd Net Earns Flng OrgfalseCompBsdNetEarnsFlngOrgInd
Comp Bsd Net Earns Rltd OrgsfalseCompBsdNetEarnsRltdOrgsInd
Any Non Fixed PaymentsfalseAnyNonFixedPaymentsInd
Initial Contract ExceptionfalseInitialContractExceptionInd

Rltd Org Officer Trst Key Empl RltdOrgOfficerTrstKeyEmplGrp (10 entries)

TitleTitleTxtBase Compensation Filing OrgBaseCompensationFilingOrgAmtCompensation Based On Rltd OrgsCompensationBasedOnRltdOrgsAmtBonus Filing OrganizationBonusFilingOrganizationAmountBonus Related OrganizationsBonusRelatedOrganizationsAmtOther Compensation Filing OrgOtherCompensationFilingOrgAmtOther Compensation Rltd OrgsOtherCompensationRltdOrgsAmtDeferred Compensation Flng OrgDeferredCompensationFlngOrgAmtDeferred Comp Rltd OrgsDeferredCompRltdOrgsAmtNontaxable Benefits Filing OrgNontaxableBenefitsFilingOrgAmtNontaxable Benefits Rltd OrgsNontaxableBenefitsRltdOrgsAmtTotal Compensation Filing OrgTotalCompensationFilingOrgAmtTotal Compensation Rltd OrgsTotalCompensationRltdOrgsAmtComp Report Prior990 Filing OrgCompReportPrior990FilingOrgAmtComp Report Prior990 Rltd OrgsCompReportPrior990RltdOrgsAmt
DONALD RAGONA
DEVELOPMENT DIRECTOR$186,977$0$0$0$3,048$0$14,166$0$30,535$0$234,726$0$0$0
JOHN ECHOHAWK
EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR$292,044$0$0$0$1,854$0$22,458$0$12,156$0$328,512$0$0$0
MATTHEW CAMPBELL
DEPUTY DIRECTOR$254,488$0$0$0$240$0$14,921$0$22,530$0$292,179$0$0$0
MICHAEL KENNEDY
CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER$200,863$0$0$0$1,584$0$15,651$0$25,365$0$243,463$0$0$0
SARAH TRUJILLO PALACIOS
CORPORATE SECRETARY$143,292$0$0$0$240$0$8,102$0$21,896$0$173,530$0$0$0
BRETT SHELTON
ATTORNEY$255,401$0$0$0$1,584$0$14,920$0$13,956$0$285,861$0$0$0
DAVID GOVER
ATTORNEY$243,470$0$0$0$552$0$14,362$0$25,440$0$283,824$0$0$0
MELODY MCCOY
ATTORNEY$242,674$0$0$0$1,584$0$20,439$0$39,274$0$303,971$0$0$0
SUSAN NOE
ATTORNEY$256,753$0$0$0$1,584$0$14,959$0$13,296$0$286,592$0$0$0
KIM GOTTSCHALK
ATTORNEY$254,672$0$0$0$1,854$0$20,439$0$23,165$0$300,130$0$0$0

Supplemental Information Detail SupplementalInformationDetail

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Form And Line ReferenceSchedule J, Part I, Line 4b Supplemental nonqualified retirement planFormAndLineReferenceDesc
ExplanationAMOUNT OF AWARD UNDER THE ORGANIZATIONS NONQUALIFIED PLAN IS DETERMINED BY INCORPORATING YEARS OF SERVICE, AGE AND AVERAGE THREE-YEAR BASE SALARY. THE ONE-TIME CASH AWARD IS PAYABLE AT THE DATE OF RETIREMENT FOR ELIGIBLE EMPLOYEES. THE FOLLOWING EMPLOYEES ACCRUED DEFERRED RETIREMENT COMPENSATION UNDER THE PLAN: *JOHN ECHOHAWK - $5,480 *MELODY MCCOY - $5,480 *KIM GOTTSCHALK - $5,480 *MICHAEL KENNEDY - $3,739 *DONALD RAGONA - $2,979ExplanationTxt

Schedule M IRS990ScheduleM

Securities Publicly Traded SecuritiesPubliclyTradedGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Non Cash CheckboxYes (X)NonCashCheckboxInd
Contribution5ContributionCnt
Noncash Contributions Rpt F990$32,407NoncashContributionsRptF990Amt
Method Of Determining RevenuesMarket valueMethodOfDeterminingRevenuesTxt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Form8283 Received0Form8283ReceivedCnt
Any Property That Must Be HeldfalseAnyPropertyThatMustBeHeldInd
Review Process Unusual NC GiftsfalseReviewProcessUnusualNCGiftsInd
Third Parties UsedfalseThirdPartiesUsedInd

Supplemental Information Detail SupplementalInformationDetail

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Form And Line ReferenceSchedule M, Part I Explanations of reporting method for number of contributionsFormAndLineReferenceDesc
ExplanationSecurities - Publicly traded - NUMBER OF CONTRIBUTIONS: THE NUMBER SHOWN ON COLUMN B REPRESENTS THE NUMBER OF CONTRIBUTIONS RECEIVED.ExplanationTxt

Schedule O IRS990ScheduleO

Supplemental Information Detail SupplementalInformationDetail (10 entries)

Form And Line ReferenceFormAndLineReferenceDescExplanationExplanationTxt
Form 990, Part III, Line 4aThe Native American Rights Fund (NARF) is the oldest and largest non-profit law firm dedicated to serving the legal advocacy needs of tribal nations and their communities across the country. NARF assists in the evolution, assertion, and defense of tribal sovereignty, and is considered the premier thought leader in the field of Federal Indian Law. Continuing threats to tribal nations, their interests, and their constitutionally guaranteed rights affirm the need for the casework and programming of NARF. NARF is guided by five mission priorities which include the preservation of tribal existence, the protection of tribal natural resources, the promotion of human rights, the accountability of governments to Native Americans, the development of Indian law, and by extension, the education of the public about contemporary Indian rights, laws, and issues. A board of directors consisting of tribal and indigenous leaders from across the country guides the direction of NARF to the fulfillment of our mission in protecting tribal interests, and our litigation management committee alongside our corporate officers ensures that the programs and cases NARF engages in will continue to effectively advocate under the umbrella of Federal Indian law for the benefit of tribal nations. FY2024 was a year of continued growth for our organization, and an opportunity to see many successful assertions of tribal sovereignty. The development of new coalitions of legal advocates, in-house tribal general counsels, and academics assures that NARF will continue to be agile and prepared to assist tribal nations with their ongoing legal needs and challenges. This report will highlight a few of the programs and case updates from FY2024. NARF Programs - Tribal Supreme Court Project The Tribal Supreme Court Project is a program spearheaded by the Native American Rights Fund (NARF) and the National Congress of American Indians (NCAI) that consists of a coalition of over 200 attorneys, academics, Indian Law and U.S. Supreme Court practitioners, tribal in-house attorneys, and other legal organizations. The project recognizes that a single Supreme Court decision, good or bad, has the potential to benefit or adversely impact all tribal nations, and so the project coordinates, strategizes, and provides critical resources to tribes and individuals whose cases may potentially appear before the court. The project began in 2001 when American Indian/Alaska Native Tribes were losing almost 80% of their cases in the Supreme Court of the United States (SCOTUS). As a critical resource to tribal nations, the project coordinates and focuses resources to improve advocacy and results in Tribal SCOTUS cases and has improved the win-loss ratio for tribes by assisting in over 40 cases decided by the SCOTUS and dozens more that the SCOTUS declined to hear. One example of the project's success is seen in the Haaland v. Brackeen (2022) case which involved the validity of the 1978 Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA). The project worked directly and closely with the 4 Tribal parties to the case and the U.S. Solicitor General's Office and we coordinated 21 separate amicus curiae (friend of the court) briefs filed in support of the Tribes and the United States, including amicus briefs of a collective 497 tribes and 62 tribal organizations; a collective 23 states and the District of Columbia; and a collective 87 members of the U.S. Congress. The project also hosted or participated in 4 moot courts for the tribes' arguing counsel to assist them in practicing, strategizing, and polishing their oral arguments, with the resulting work helping to secure a 7-2 SCOTUS decision upholding the ICWA, an even more triumphant victory because less than a decade before, the SCOTUS had ruled against tribal interests in its most previous ICWA case. - Judicial Selection Project The goal of the Judicial Selection Project is to increase the representation of Native Americans in the federal and state judiciaries. To that end, the Project helps recruit and support qualified Native candidates for federal and state judicial appointments. The Project works with the White House to promote better Native American representation in the federal judiciary and the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee to ensure that nominees are asked about their experience with Indian tribes and their understanding of federal Indian law during confirmation proceedings. Project staff also participate in several coalitions that work to increase demographic and professional diversity in the judiciary. The Project also evaluates the records of judicial nominees on their knowledge of Indian issues. The analysis and conclusions are shared with stakeholders and federal decision-makers in relation to their decision whether to support or oppose a particular nomination. The Project also seeks to educate the federal judiciary about tribal issues, educating tribal leaders about the federal judiciary and the judicial nomination process, and reaching out to elected officials and the public at large about the need for Native American federal judges and judges who understand the unique legal status of Indian tribes. There are approximately 39 vacancies in the federal judiciary. NARF will seek to work with the new Administration to continue to ensure that qualified Native candidates are considered and nominated to fill vacancies on the federal bench. In the next four years, we also anticipate increased focus on state level vacancies - World Intellectual Property Organization Instruments on Traditional Knowledge, Genetic Resources, and Traditional Cultural Expressions NARF represents NCAI regarding the ongoing negotiations for a potential international instrument or instruments to protect various types of Indigenous Peoples' intellectual property, including Traditional Knowledge (TK), Genetic Resources and Associated Traditional Knowledge (GRAATK), and Traditional Cultural Expressions (TCE). The United States has been participating in these negotiations at the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) Intergovernmental Committee on Intellectual Property and Genetic Resources, Traditional Knowledge and Folklore (IGC) since 2000, and since 2010, the negotiations have centered on the three potential instruments' draft text. The U.S. Department of State has delegated authority to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) for these negotiations, but prior to 2023/2024 neither the PTO, the State Department, nor any other federal agency had ever consulted with American Indian and Alaska Native Tribes regarding the negotiations.
Form 990, Part III, Line 4aAt its 2016 Annual Convention, NCAI passed a resolution calling for such consultation. The PTO and other federal agencies conducted the first listening sessions with Tribes on this matter at NCAI's 2017 Mid-Year Conference and Annual Convention. In May 2017, NARF and the University of Colorado Law School hosted a drafting session on the WIPO TCE instrument. With NCAI's approval, NARF took a proposed draft of new TCE provisions to the 34th WIPO session in Geneva, Switzerland in June 2017. The WIPO Indigenous Caucus approved the draft and some of the text from it was introduced into the draft TCE instrument. Work in FY2024 included: January-February 2024: After over 20 years, USPTO finally initiated formal tribal consultation on the WIPO negotiations in October 2023. NARF represented NCAI in the webinar portion of the consultation on January 19 and 23, 2024, and prepared written comments that were submitted February 23, 2024. 68 * April 2024: NCAI delivered an intervention at the UNPFII Session requesting a recommendation for ensuring effective Indigenous participation in the Diplomatic Conference on Genetic Resources. May 13-24, 2024: Diplomatic Conference on Genetic Resources: Historic adoption of a treaty that includes provisions for Indigenous Peoples, such as the disclosure of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge in patent applications. The U.S. has not yet signed the treaty. NARF represented NCAI in the negotiations at the Diplomatic Conference. September-October 2024: NCAI prepared positions on the WIPO Design Law Treaty to be discussed at the Diplomatic Conference in Saudi Arabia (November 11-22, 2024), focusing on disclosure of traditional knowledge and the control of Indigenous designs in publicly accessible databases. NARF also represented NCAI in a one-day WIPO stocktaking session in Geneva on November 29, 2024, to discuss outcomes from the GRATK Treaty Diplomatic Conference, and in a week-long negotiating session December 2-6, 2024, which resumed negotiations on the TK and TCEs texts. Negotiations on the TK and TCEs text will continue in Geneva in March 2025. This work is ongoing. NARF Initiatives/Coalitions - Homelands Coalition For more than 50 years, the Native American Rights Fund ("NARF") has been the premiere legal advocate and thought leader for Tribal Nations in the United States. Our impact litigation, coupled with companion projects and programs, protect the inherent sovereignty of Tribal Nations and occupy a much-needed space in the field of federal Indian law and policy. Protecting sacred places, lands, and water across the country has long been a pillar of NARF's work. Two of our five organizational priorities have been to Protect Tribal Natural Resources and to Preserve Tribal Existence, each dependent on tribes' ability to maintain strong relationships with their homelands. Our reputation, built on over 50 years of leadership supporting Tribal Nations, enables us to use existing relationships to find meaningful ways to bring people together to address these pressing issues. We maintain strong working relationships with Tribal Nations located throughout the country, many that seek a healthy ecosystem and want to build resilient communities, and we have strong partnerships with state, federal, and non-governmental organizations that share interests in resolving environmental crises. NARF proposes to broaden our work to increase coordination and capacity to assist Tribal Nations in protecting their Homelands in a strategic and thoughtful manner. The project, will, among other things: * Develop a coalition of partners that work in the field to coordinate and strategize ways to better protect Homelands. * Continue, and build our capacity, to litigate and participate in administrative actions to protect our Homelands. * Continue to work in collaboration with our current partners such as the NBSCRA Coalition, Tule River Indian Tribe, Bears Ears Intertribal Coalition, to continue our co-management work. * Continue to develop our Sacred Places Project Advisory Committee to seek to improve federal and state sacred place and environmental law and policy (e.g., religious freedom, trust obligations, environmental protections, law reformation, etc.). * Host convenings when appropriate. * Develop the next generation of advocates. - Native American Voting Rights Coalition The Native American Voting Rights Coalition (NAVRC) continues to stand at the forefront of challenging issues to native voters in the areas of voting rights and election protection. Our voting rights practice group and the Native American Voting Rights Coalition (NAVRC) we lead, is an ongoing success in addressing longstanding barriers and active efforts to diminish native voter participation in local, state, and federal elections. NARF and NAVRC (A coalition comprised of NARF, the National Congress of American Indians, the ACLU: Voting Rights Project, Fair Elections Center, Western Native Voice, and other voting rights orgs, advocates, in-house tribal attorneys, and other experts), spent 2024 actively working to increase access to the ballot box for Native Americans across the country. We met monthly to discuss ongoing barriers and solutions and established various working groups to address issues such as communications and strategy toward passage of the Native American Voting Rights Act (NAVRA). In May, nearly 50 NAVRC members, brought together and led by NARF, met on the Santa Ana Pueblo in New Mexico to collaborate and discuss GOTV strategy, pool resources, and document ongoing needs. On Election Day 2024, over 170 law students and attorney volunteers, trained by NARF and partners, monitored polling sites on or near reservations and pueblos across six states to provide election protection support for Native voters. As the first of its kind, the Native Vote Election Protection Project serves Indian Country at large and coordinates organizations, individuals, and tribal nations working to protect the native vote. Poll watchers and observers coordinated with NARF attorneys to staff call/command centers to document their experiences and observations, as well as to provide information and advice on ensuring their fair participation in the election. NAVRC Litigation - Litigation https://vote.narf.org/our-work/ At present, NARF has been successful in every litigation brought under the Voting Rights Practice Group. This remarkable record of success has required ongoing diligence, a long-term commitment to complex litigation, and the leveraging of strategic partnerships. Litigation remains at the heart of NARF's voter protection work, and NARF remains the voting practice trusted to defend Native interests across Indian Country. Important litigation wins in 2024 included: - Successfully defending ballot collection and same day voter registration in Montana (Western Native Voice et al v. Jacobsen) - Successfully increasing the types of proof of residential location accepted in Arizona so that Native Americans without mailing addresses on their homes could vote (Tohono O'odham Nation v. Brnovich) - Successfully increasing language assistance in Alaska (Toyukak v. Treadwell) - Increasing voter registration opportunities in South Dakota (Rosebud Sioux Tribe v. Barnett) - NARF litigated to increase ballot cure provisions in Alaska throughout 2024 but that case is ongoing (Arctic Village Council et al v. Fenumaiai et al) Additionally, NARF continued its redistricting litigation following the first ever Fair Districting in Indian Country project. Building on its previous litigation wins, in 2024 NARF successfully defended and won a Native majority districts in North Dakota and continued to defend the Voting Rights Act from attacks on the ability for private plaintiffs to bring voting rights litigation. (Walen et al. v. Burgum et al.; Turtle Mountain Band of Chippewa Indians, et al. v. Michael Howe). NARF is currently drafting briefing for the Supreme Court to defend its litigation wins in Montana and North Dakota. (Western Native Voice et al v. Jacobsen; Walen et al. v. Burgum et al.)
Form 990, Part III, Line 4a- Tribal Water Institute NARF continues to build and expand the Tribal Water Institute (TWI), a project to address the unique and often technically challenging water law issues of tribal communities. Vital resources are needed to address climate change, environmental management frameworks, varying water and water priority issues, and under-representation in management discussions and agreements will be addressed by this innovative approach to tribal water issues. The TWI will address the shortage of water law expertise across Indian Country, bolster educational efforts, and provide thoughtful leadership in advocating for tribal water rights. In early summer, NARF hired four TWI Legal Fellows, three for the Boulder office and one for the Alaska office. These fellows are working on all of NARF's water cases. We have formally accepted four new cases and an amicus opportunity under the TWI and we are considering additional cases as well as additional short-term (e.g., amicus party) prospects. Due to client confidentiality needs, these new cases and issues are noted generally below: * EPA CWA rule litigation defense, N.D. Federal District Court. * Representing Washington Tribe in FERC hydropower relicense process. * Representing non-federally recognized California Tribe on fishery and water issues. * Represent Utah Tribe on water rights protection issue. * Amicus on tribal jurisdiction over groundwater in riparian states. NARF has also been participating in many tribal conferences, webinars, and other collaborative opportunities to raise awareness of the TWI, to gain insight into tribal water priorities and build collaborations. Case Updates NARF is currently guided by five mission priorities which guides and directs our case selection committee as to the types of high impact issues that need to be addressed. This covers a broad base of practice areas under the umbrella of Federal Indian Law, but this summary will provide a handful of case examples to illustrate the types of cases that tribal nations need assistance with. - Bay Mills Indian Community and Enbridge Line 5 expansion NARF and Earthjustice jointly represent the Bay Mills Indian Community to fight a proposed oil pipeline tunnel, which threatens the Community's treaty rights, tribal fisheries, and the environment. The proposed tunnel would encapsulate oil giant Enbridge's Line 5 pipeline under the Straits of Mackinac. Bay Mills has a long-standing and critical interest in the waters of the Great Lakes, the Straits of Mackinac, and the surrounding region. As one of the signatories to the 1836 Treaty of Washington, which ceded nearly 14 million acres to the United States for the creation of the State of Michigan, Bay Mills reserved the right to fish, hunt, and gather throughout the territory - including in the Great Lakes and the Straits of Mackinac. Furthermore, the area has deep cultural, religious, and economic significance to the Community. On August 12, 2020, a Michigan Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) granted Bay Mills Indian Community the right to intervene in an ongoing contested case process pending before the Michigan Public Service Commission (MPSC). The MPSC is evaluating Enbridge's permit application to build a tunnel beneath the Straits of Mackinac, and relocate a new segment of its Line 5 pipeline. After many years of litigation and multiple hearings, on December 1, 2023, the MPSC issued an order approving Enbridge's permit application. Bay Mills, along with other Tribal intervenors, appealed the decision to the Michigan Court of Appeals. Briefing is complete and oral argument took place on January 13, 2025. We are awaiting the decision. - State of Idaho, et al. v. EPA NARF, Kanji & Katzen P.L.L.C., and Earthjustice are co-counseling to represent twelve Tribal Nations in a lawsuit that a dozen states brought against the EPA challenging amendments to Clean Water Act regulations. The case, Idaho, et al. v. EPA, is a challenge to EPA's Tribal Reserved Rights Rule, a revision and addition to Clean Water Act regulations that requires states to account for aquatic-based Tribal reserved rights and water uses when setting water quality standards. The rule applies nationwide. The rule is intended to create a consistent approach for states to employ to incorporate Tribal rights when states develop water quality standards. The states allege EPA has overstepped its authority under the Clean Water Act and that the agency cannot force the states to recognize Tribal rights, a job the states argue is exclusively federal. In mid-June, the states moved for a preliminary injunction to stay the implementation of the rule. The court did not rule on the motion and we completed summary judgement briefing in late January and are awaiting a hearing date.. The Tribal parties intervening as defendants include the Nez Perce Tribe, Confederated Salish & Kootenai Tribes of the Flathead Reservation, Quinault Indian Nation, Bay Mills Indian Community, Puyallup Tribe of Indians, Lac du Flambeau Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, Red Lake Nation, Fond du Lac Band of Lake Superior Chippewa Indians, Grand Traverse Band of Ottawa and Chippewa Indians, White Earth Band of Minnesota Chippewa Tribe, Port Gamble S'Klallam Tribe, and the Sokaogon Chippewa Community. - Bears Ears National Monument For several years, the Bears Ears Inter Tribal Coalition, a consortium of five sovereign Indian nations (Hopi, Navajo, Uintah & Ouray Ute, Ute Mountain Ute, and Zuni) has worked to protect Bears Ears in Utah, one of America's most significant unprotected cultural landscapes. The Bears Ears region contains at least 100,000 archaeological sites, some dated back to 12,000 BCE, and is still critical to many tribes today for spiritual and hunting and gathering purposes. After years of advocacy, prior administrations designated the Bears Ears region as a National Monument which was diminished by subsequent administrations. On October 8, 2021, President Biden issued a proclamation restoring the Bears Ears National Monument to its original size, plus some additional acreage. On August 24, 2022, the State of Utah filed suit against President Biden. The state is arguing that President Biden abused his authority in creating Bears Ears and Grand Staircase Escalante in numerous ways and that the monuments are far too large to protect the historic and scientific objects the Antiquities Act was meant to protect. The United States District Court of the District of Utah granted motions to dismiss the cases challenging the Bears Ears National Monument Designation. The State and mining companies have appealed that decision to the 10th Circuit Court of Appeals. The Tenth Circuit heard oral argument on September 26, 2024, in Boulder, Colorado, and NARF argued on behalf of the Tribal Nations. - Western Native Voice v. Jacobsen On May 17, 2021, NARF filed this case on behalf of four tribes challenging a Montana state law that prevents ballot collection and removes Election Day registration. HB 176 attempted to end Election Day registration which reservation voters have relied upon to cast votes in Montana since 2005. The other law attempted to block organized ballot collection on rural reservations (HB 530), despite the thirteenth district court ruling unconstitutional a similar anti-ballot collection law in Western Native Voice v. Stapleton which NARF brought and won in 2020. These laws show an ongoing pattern of anti-Native election-related legislation in the state. On September 30, 2022, following a two-week trial, the District Court issued an order in Plaintiff's favor on all counts. The District Court also found evidence of racial discrimination given this pattern of denying access to Native Americans. NARF and the ACLU represent GOTV organizations. The case has been consolidated with a similar case brought by the Democratic party and youth groups that also challenged a ban on student ID's. The District Court also found the ban on student ID's unconstitutional. The State filed an appeal with the state Supreme Court. In late March 2024 the Montana Supreme Court upheld our District Court win. In June 2024, the State filed a notice of appeal to the US Supreme Court, in an unprecedented move and on August 26, filed a cert petition. We filed our response in mid-December 2024.
Form 990, Part III, Line 4a- Walen v. Burgum On March 30, 2022, the Mandan, Hidatsa and Arikara Nation (MHA) and individual Native American voters filed a motion with the United States District Court for the District of North Dakota to intervene in Walen et al. v. Burgum et al. This is a lawsuit brought by two individuals seeking to eliminate the majority-Native state legislative subdistrict encompassing the Fort Berthold reservation in North Dakota. The tribal government and Native voters seek to defend the subdistrict, which ensures MHA tribal members have an equal opportunity to elect a candidate that represents their interests to the North Dakota State House. The plaintiffs moved for a preliminary injunction last year, and the State of North Dakota and MHA Nation opposed. The three-judge panel denied the motion, and the election was allowed to proceed, which resulted in the MHA Nation's district for the first time being represented by an MHA tribal member. On November 2, 2023, the three-judge panel granted MHA Nation's motion for summary judgment, dismissing the case and vacating the trial. The plaintiffs appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, but the tribal government and Native voters have moved to dismiss the appeal. On January 13, 2025, the Supreme Court ruled summarily in our favor. That brought the case to the end on the merits, though we anticipate pursuing attorney's fees. We co-counsel with Campaign Legal Center and Bryan Sells. This redistricting case was a critical victory in ensuring that the tribe's interests would be adequately represented at the state level. - NAGPRA Repatriation Cases NARF has succeeded in assisting Sisseton Wahpeton Oyate and Spirit Lake Nation to bring the remains of two of their children, Amos LaFromboise and Edward Upright, back to their tribal homelands from the Carlisle Barracks Post Cemetery ("Carlisle Cemetery"). This was accomplished pursuant to a first-of-its-kind, written and signed agreement with the Army, which was negotiated between the Tribes and the Army in arms-length, government-to government negotiations. While the Tribes initially sought to have the boys repatriated pursuant to the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act ("NAGPRA"), the Tribes ultimately decided to, without waiving their NAGPRA rights, negotiate a general, government-to-government agreement for disinterment and return of the boys. The Tribes viewed this option as preferable once it became apparent the Army was willing to negotiate a plan for the disinterment and return of the boys that would engage the Tribes and the Army in a government-to-government relationship and facilitate meaningful negotiation of terms. NARF is continuing to work with the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska to repatriate two of its children, Edward Hensley and Samuel Gilbert, from the Carlisle Cemetery. NARF is working with the Big Fire Law & Policy Center in representing the Tribe. In October 2023, the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska requested the repatriation of Samuel's and Edward's remains pursuant to NAGPRA. On December 7, 2023, the Army refused to comply with the law and denied Winnebago's request. On January 17, 2024, NARF, its co-counsel at Cultural Heritage Partners, and the Winnebago Tribe of Nebraska's general counsel, Danelle Smith, filed a federal lawsuit against the United States Army ("Army") in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia seeking the repatriation of the remains of Samuel Gilbert and Edward Hensley from the Carlisle Cemetery pursuant to NAGPRA. Through its lawsuit, Winnebago seeks to enforce its plainly apparent rights under NAGPRA. However, the battle to enforce NAGPRA repatriation at Carlisle also symbolizes a broader effort to obtain justice and healing for all Tribal Nations impacted by the cultural and literal genocide carried out by federal Indian boarding schools. On May 3, 2024, the Army filed a motion to dismiss Winnebago's lawsuit. In their motion, the Army argued that NAGPRA is not applicable to the Native American human remains buried at Carlisle Cemetery and that applying NAGPRA at Carlisle would dishonor the Native American children buried there. On July 12, 2024, NARF argued the motion to dismiss at the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia (EDVA) in Alexandria, Virginia. On August 20, 2024, the EDvA granted the Army's motion to dismiss. On October 21, 2024, Winnebago filed its notice of appeal with the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit (Fourth Circuit). Winnebago's opening brief was due in early 2025. - Haaland v. Brackeen/Indian Child Welfare Case In the past decade, anti-Tribal interests have engaged in serial federal court litigation challenging the Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA) with the goal of undermining ICWA and tribal sovereignty. The most potentially consequential case was Haaland v. Brackeen (formerly Brackeen v. Zinke and Brackeen v. Bernardt). In early October 2018, Judge Reed O'Connor of the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas found that ICWA is unconstitutional on the grounds that (1) violated the Equal Protection Clause as an unconstitutional "race-based" statute, (2) inserted the federal government into state affairs by "commandeering" state courts and agencies and thus violated the Tenth Amendment, and (3) impermissibly delegated federal powers to Tribes through Section 1915(c). The Cherokee Nation, Oneida Nation, Quinault Indian Nation, and Morongo Band of Mission Indians, who previously intervened in the case as defendants, asked the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit to stay the decision, which it did, and initiated an appeal. On August 9, 2019, the Fifth Circuit overturned the District Court's opinion and affirmed the constitutionality of ICWA. However, the Individual Plaintiffs and the State Plaintiffs petitioned the Fifth Circuit to rehear the case en banc. The Fifth Circuit en banc decision generally upheld the authority of Congress to enact ICWA, and also held that ICWA does not operate on the basis of race. On September 3, 2021, the United States Department of Justice, intervening Tribal Nations (including the Navajo Nation), and Texas and individual Plaintiffs all formally asked the United States Supreme Court to review the Fifth Circuit's en banc decision. On February 28, 2022, the Supreme Court granted all four petitions and consolidated the case under Haaland v. Brackeen. Merits briefing took place the summer of 2022. NARF, along with our co-counsel at Dentons, filed a Tribal Amicus Brief on behalf of federally recognized Tribes and national and regional Native organizations. The Tribal Amicus Brief filed in August 2022 was signed by 497 Tribes and 62 Native organizations-to our knowledge, the largest show of Indian Country support for any brief before the United States Supreme Court. NARF also initiated the Tribal Supreme Court Project (TSCP) process for the case. The TSCP organized regular Brackeen Workgroup meetings and coordinated amicus support for the Tribal parties. The Tribal Amicus Brief was joined by an overwhelming show of support for ICWA: 21 pro-ICWA briefs were filed, representing the voices of many ICWA stakeholders, including parents, former foster youth, child welfare professionals, medical professionals, legal scholars, state governments, Members of Congress, and other officials. This avalanche of support-much of which referenced ICWA being the "gold standard" for child welfare practices-dwarfed the voices in opposition. Oral argument was heard on November 9, 2022. On June 15, 2023, the Supreme Court issued its decision, a full-throated, 7-2 opinion affirming the constitutionality of the Indian Child Welfare Act. The majority opinion was written by Justice Barrett, and it soundly rejected the Petitioners' arguments that Congress lacked the authority to pass ICWA or that, through ICWA, Congress exerted unconstitutional control over States. Justice Barrett's opinion also rejected the non-Indian individual and state Petitioners' equal protection and nondelegation arguments on the grounds that these challengers did not have standing to raise those arguments.
Form 990, Part III, Line 4aIn short: Tribes won on every issue that had been appealed. Justice Gorsuch wrote a concurring opinion, which was partially joined by Justice Sotomayor and Justice Jackson, in which he delved more deeply into the history behind ICWA, explaining that ICWA "did not emerge from a vacuum. It came as a direct response to the mass removal of Indian children from their families during the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s by state officials and private parties." In addition, Justice Gorsuch noted that while Congress has broad power to legislate with respect to Indian affairs, the Constitution also recognizes Tribes' inherent sovereignty and promises Tribes "sovereignty for as long as they wish to keep it." NARF was pleased to assist in this resounding effort to protect Native children as well as the inherent sovereignty of tribal nations.
Form 990, Part VI, Line 15 Line 15a & 15bREVIEW OF CEO AND TOP MANAGEMENT OFFICIAL COMPENSATION: AN EXTENSIVE SALARY SURVEY IS PERFORMED FOR ALL POSITIONS IN THE SUMMER OF EVERY EVEN YEAR IN WHICH CURRENT SALARIES ARE COMPARED TO MARKET SURVEY DATA OBTAINED FROM A VARIETY OF PROFESSIONAL SURVEY SOURCES. THIS INFORMATION IS THEN SUBMITTED TO THE EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE OF THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS FOR REVIEW AND THEN DISCUSSED AND APPROVED DURING AN EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEETING. MINUTES OF THE MEETING ARE TAKEN FOR SUBSTANTIATION OF THE DELIBERATION AND DECISION. THIS PROCEDURE WAS LAST PERFORMED IN 2024.
Form 990, Part VI, Line 11b Review of form 990 by governing bodyPROCESS TO REVIEW THE FORM 990: THE FORM 990 IS PREPARED BY THIRD PARTY PREPARERS. THE CHIEF FINANCIAL OFFICER THOROUGHLY REVIEWS THE FORM 990 AND THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS ARE PROVIDED WITH COPIES OF THE FORM 990 PRIOR TO FILING WITH THE IRS.
Form 990, Part VI, Line 12c Conflict of interest policyPROCESS FOR MONITORING COMPLIANCE WITH CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY: BOARD OF DIRECTORS, OFFICERS, SUPERVISORS, AND OTHER PROFESSIONAL STAFF ARE REQUIRED TO COMPLETE A CONFLICT OF INTEREST DISCLOSURE STATEMENT ANUALLY (BY JANUARY 15 OF EACH YEAR). DISCLOSURE AND DETERMINATION OF THE POTENTIAL CONFLICT OF INTEREST (PCI) AT THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS LEVEL IS DISCLOSED TO THE BOARD CHAIR (IF THE BOARD CHAIR IS THE ONE WITH PCI, THEN TO THE VICE-CHAIR), WHICH IS THEN BROUGHT TO THE FULL BOARD FOR CONSIDERATION AND DETERMINATION. BOARD MEMBERS WITH PCI SHALL BE ABSENT FROM THE BOARD'S DISCUSSION AND DECISION. EMPLOYEES WITH PCI SHALL GO TO THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR (ED) (IF ED HAS A PCI, THEN TO THE BOARD CHAIR). THE MATTER WILL THEN GO TO CORPORATE OFFICERS FOR CONSIDERATION AND DETERMINATION.
Form 990, Part VI, Line 19 Required documents available to the publicEXPLAIN WHY 1023/1024, 990, OR 990-T IS NOT AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC: FORM 1023 WAS FILED BEFORE JULY 15, 1987 AND A COPY WAS NOT AVAILABLE AT THAT TIME. DESCRIBE HOW DOCUMENTS ARE MADE AVAILABLE TO THE PUBLIC: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ARE AVAILABLE ON OUR WEBSITE AND UPON REQUEST. REQUESTS (WITH A VALID BUSINESS PURPOSE) FOR THE MANAGING DOCUMENTS AND CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY WILL BE CONSIDERED.
Form 990, Part VIII, Line 1eGOVERNMENT GRANTS: THE AMOUNT SHOWN AS GOVERNMENT GRANTS ON LINE 1(E) INCLUDES $1,247,850 OF CONTRIBUTIONS REVENUE FROM APPROXIMATELY 20 TRIBAL GOVERNMENTS.

Comments

Anonymous: no account or email. Up to 2,000 characters, at most one link. Comments are checked automatically; some wait for review.