BRAIN TRAUMA FOUNDATION INC: Form 990, tax year 2015

View the entire original 990 at ProPublica ↗

Organization
BRAIN TRAUMA FOUNDATION INC (EIN 13-3764444)
Tax period
2015-01-01 to 2015-12-31
Filed
2016-11-14
IRS object ID
201613199349311541
Schema version
2015v2.1
Source
Download XML · Original 990 at ProPublica

Every field in the e-filed return. Faint text is the IRS element name, for citing.

Return header ReturnHeader

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Return2016-11-14T19:00:11-06:00ReturnTs
Tax Period End2015-12-31TaxPeriodEndDt

Preparer Firm PreparerFirmGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Preparer Firm EIN271728945PreparerFirmEIN

Preparer Firm Name PreparerFirmName

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1PKF O'CONNOR DAVIES LLPBusinessNameLine1Txt

Preparer US Address PreparerUSAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line1500 MAMARONECK AVENUEAddressLine1Txt
CityHARRISONCityNm
State AbbreviationNYStateAbbreviationCd
ZIP105281633ZIPCd
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Return Type990ReturnTypeCd
Tax Period Begin2015-01-01TaxPeriodBeginDt

Filer Filer

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
EIN133764444EIN

Business Name BusinessName

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1BRAIN TRAUMA FOUNDATION INCBusinessNameLine1Txt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name ControlBRAIBusinessNameControlTxt
Phone4083699735PhoneNum

US Address USAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line11999 S BASCOM AVENUE NO 1040AddressLine1Txt
CityCAMPBELLCityNm
State AbbreviationCAStateAbbreviationCd
ZIP95008ZIPCd

Business Officer BusinessOfficerGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
PersonJAMSHID GHAJAR MD PHDPersonNm
Person TitlePRESIDENTPersonTitleTxt
Phone4083699735PhoneNum
Signature2016-11-14SignatureDt
Discuss With Paid PreparerYes (1)DiscussWithPaidPreparerInd

Preparer Person PreparerPersonGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Preparer PersonGARRETT M HIGGINSPreparerPersonNm
PTINP00543209PTIN
Phone9143818900PhoneNum
Preparation2016-11-14PreparationDt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Tax2015TaxYr
Build TS2017-02-10 21:41:12ZBuildTS

Form 990 IRS990

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address ChangeYes (X)AddressChangeInd
Principal OfficerJAMSHID GHAJAR MD PHDPrincipalOfficerNm

US Address USAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line11999 S BASCOM AVENUE NO 1040AddressLine1Txt
CityCAMPBELLCityNm
State AbbreviationCAStateAbbreviationCd
ZIP95008ZIPCd
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Gross Receipts$7,757,629GrossReceiptsAmt
Group Return For Affiliates0GroupReturnForAffiliatesInd
Organization501c3Yes (X)Organization501c3Ind
Website AddressWWW.BRAINTRAUMA.ORGWebsiteAddressTxt
Type Of Organization CorpYes (X)TypeOfOrganizationCorpInd
Formation1994FormationYr
Legal Domicile StateNYLegalDomicileStateCd
Activity Or MissionTO HELP IMPROVE THE TREATMENT AND RECOVERY OF PATIENTS WITH TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY AND NEUROLOGICAL DISEASES BY DEVELOPING BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES, CONDUCTING CLINICAL RESEARCH, AND EDUCATING MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS AND CONSUMERS.ActivityOrMissionDesc
Voting Members Governing Body10VotingMembersGoverningBodyCnt
Voting Members Independent9VotingMembersIndependentCnt
Total Employee40TotalEmployeeCnt
Total Volunteers10TotalVolunteersCnt
Total Gross UBI$0TotalGrossUBIAmt
Net Unrelated Bus Txbl Incm$0NetUnrelatedBusTxblIncmAmt
PY Contributions Grants$297,523PYContributionsGrantsAmt
CY Contributions Grants$91,890CYContributionsGrantsAmt
PY Program Service Revenue$5,867,719PYProgramServiceRevenueAmt
CY Program Service Revenue$7,655,504CYProgramServiceRevenueAmt
PY Investment Income-$288PYInvestmentIncomeAmt
CY Investment Income$511CYInvestmentIncomeAmt
PY Other Revenue$3,820PYOtherRevenueAmt
CY Other Revenue$8,815CYOtherRevenueAmt
PY Total Revenue$6,168,774PYTotalRevenueAmt
CY Total Revenue$7,756,720CYTotalRevenueAmt
PY Grants And Similar Paid$135,000PYGrantsAndSimilarPaidAmt
CY Grants And Similar Paid$20,000CYGrantsAndSimilarPaidAmt
PY Benefits Paid To Members$0PYBenefitsPaidToMembersAmt
CY Benefits Paid To Members$0CYBenefitsPaidToMembersAmt
PY Salaries Comp Emp Bnft Paid$3,581,926PYSalariesCompEmpBnftPaidAmt
CY Salaries Comp Emp Bnft Paid$3,142,529CYSalariesCompEmpBnftPaidAmt
PY Total Prof Fndrsng Expns$0PYTotalProfFndrsngExpnsAmt
CY Total Prof Fndrsng Expns$0CYTotalProfFndrsngExpnsAmt
CY Total Fundraising Expense$0CYTotalFundraisingExpenseAmt
PY Other Expenses$2,775,647PYOtherExpensesAmt
CY Other Expenses$4,860,682CYOtherExpensesAmt
PY Total Expenses$6,492,573PYTotalExpensesAmt
CY Total Expenses$8,023,211CYTotalExpensesAmt
PY Revenues Less Expenses-$323,799PYRevenuesLessExpensesAmt
CY Revenues Less Expenses-$266,491CYRevenuesLessExpensesAmt
Total Assets BOY$8,494,787TotalAssetsBOYAmt
Total Assets EOY$5,365,559TotalAssetsEOYAmt
Total Liabilities BOY$7,601,366TotalLiabilitiesBOYAmt
Total Liabilities EOY$4,794,339TotalLiabilitiesEOYAmt
Net Assets Or Fund Balances BOY$893,421NetAssetsOrFundBalancesBOYAmt
Net Assets Or Fund Balances EOY$571,220NetAssetsOrFundBalancesEOYAmt
Info In Schedule O Part IIIYes (X)InfoInScheduleOPartIIIInd
MissionTO HELP IMPROVE THE TREATMENT AND RECOVERY OF PATIENTS WITH TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY AND NEUROLOGICAL DISEASES BY DEVELOPING BEST PRACTICE GUIDELINES, CONDUCTING CLINICAL RESEARCH, AND EDUCATING MEDICAL PROFESSIONALS AND CONSUMERS.MissionDesc
Significant New Program Srvc0SignificantNewProgramSrvcInd
Significant Change0SignificantChangeInd
Expense$4,998,159ExpenseAmt
Grant$20,000GrantAmt
Revenue$2,966,722RevenueAmt
DescEYE-TRAC ADVANCETHERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 2 MILLION EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT VISITS A YEAR IN THE UNITED STATES FOR HEAD INJURY; IT IS ESTIMATED THAT OVER THE PAST TEN YEARS APPROXIMATELY 170,000 SOLDIERS HAVE SUSTAINED A TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI). THESE NUMBERS GROSSLY UNDERESTIMATE THE TRUE INCIDENCE OF TBI IN THAT THE MAJORITY OF THESE PATIENTS DO NOT SEEK IMMEDIATE ATTENTION AT A HEALTH CARE FACILITY. RECENT LITERATURE HAS DEMONSTRATED THAT PATIENTS WHO SUSTAIN A TBI MAY BE SUSCEPTIBLE TO DELAYED MANIFESTATIONS OF THE INJURY INCLUDING BEHAVIORAL AND COGNITIVE DISABILITIES.RAPID AND ACCURATE DIAGNOSIS OF THESE INDIVIDUALS EARLY AFTER A HEAD TRAUMA WOULD ENABLE TRIAGE FOR HIGHER LEVEL DIAGNOSTICS AND REMOVE THEM FROM THE RISK OF REPEAT CONCUSSIONS. IN ADDITION, AN ACCURATE COGNITIVE DIAGNOSTIC THAT IS RELIABLE WOULD BE A MARKER FOR RETURN TO MILITARY DUTY. CURRENTLY, COGNITIVE TESTING IS NOT PORTABLE, IS LENGTHY AND UNRELIABLE IN TEST-RETEST SCORING IN THAT IT CAN BE INFLUENCED BY THE EFFORT OF THE INDIVIDUAL TAKING THE TEST.THIS PROPOSED STUDY IS THE ADVANCEMENT OF THE DOD FUNDED EYE-TRAC STUDY, WHICH DEVELOPED A RESEARCH PROTOTYPE PORTABLE EYE TRACKER (EYE-TRACKING RAPID ATTENTION COMPUTATION [EYE-TRAC] GOGGLES) FOR ATTENTION ASSESSMENT FOLLOWING MILD TBI (MTBI) AS WELL AS ASSESSED THE RELIABILITY, VALIDITY, SENSITIVITY AND SELECTIVITY OF THE EYE-TRACKING PARADIGM USING A DESKTOP EYE TRACKING SYSTEM.THE MAIN HYPOTHESIS OF THIS PROJECT IS THAT PREDICTIVE EYE TRACKING OR DYNAMIC VISUAL SYNCHRONIZATION (DVS), A METRIC OF ATTENTION, HAS NORMAL POPULATION VALUES AND THAT MTBI SUBJECTS WILL HAVE ABNORMAL RESULTS IN COMPARISON. IN ADDITION, WE HYPOTHESIZE THAT THE FULLY-INTEGRATED, PORTABLE EYE-TRAC GOGGLES CAN BE ROBUST ENOUGH TO RAPIDLY ASSESS DVS ATTENTION PERFORMANCE AND IDENTIFY INTRA-INDIVIDUAL CHANGES IN EYE MOVEMENT BEHAVIOR USING A PREDICTIVE VISUAL TRACKING PARADIGM. WE WILL USE A PREDICTIVE VISUAL TRACKING PARADIGM THAT HAS BEEN DEMONSTRATED TO BE A SENSITIVE METRIC OF ATTENTION IMPAIRMENT IN MTBI SUBJECTS (1). WE PROPOSE TO PROSPECTIVELY STUDY SUBJECTS AT RISK FOR CONCUSSION USING THE EYE-TRAC GOGGLES. BASELINE EYE TRACKING DATA WILL BE OBTAINED FROM APPROXIMATELY 5,000 ATHLETES FROM COLLEGES AND HIGH SCHOOLS AS WELL AS 5,500 MILITARY PERSONNEL FROM FT. HOOD MILITARY BASE. SOME ATHLETES AND SOLDIERS WILL BE RE-TESTED WITH GOGGLES FOR RELIABILITY MEASUREMENT PURPOSES. ATHLETES WHO SUSTAIN A CONCUSSION WILL BE RECRUITED INTO A LONGITUDINAL STUDY THAT TRACKS UP TO 300 MTBI SUBJECTS. ANOTHER 360 NORMAL CIVILIANS (WITHOUT A HISTORY OF HEAD INJURY) AND 140 CIVILIANS WITH ABNORMAL EYESIGHT (MYOPIA, PRESBYOPIA, FARSIGHTEDNESS, ASTIGMATISM, CONTACT LENS WEARER, COLOR BLINDNESS, AND MACULAR DEGENERATION) WILL BE TESTED. THE PORTABLE EYE-TRAC GOGGLES WILL BE THE INSTRUMENT USED TO COLLECT EYE-TRACKING DATA AND WILL UNDERGO SEVERAL ITERATIONS OF HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE ENHANCEMENTS OVER THE COURSE OF THE STUDY TO IMPROVE THE ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY. WE PLAN TO RELEASE REVISED VERSIONS OF THE EYE-TRAC GOGGLES TO THE TESTING SITES FOR USE AND EVALUATION EVERY 9-12 MONTHS. SPECIFICALLY, WE HYPOTHESIZE THE FOLLOWING: 1. THE EYE-TRAC GOGGLES WILL MEASURE THE PREDICTIVE EYE TRACKING IN AGE AND EDUCATION DEFINED NORMAL POPULATIONS TO PRODUCE DISTRIBUTIONS OF NORMAL VALUES TO COMPARE TO TBI SUBJECTS. 2. THE EYE-TRAC GOGGLES WILL HAVE HIGH TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY. 3. THE PREDICTIVE EYE TRACKING PARAMETERS WILL BE VALIDATED AGAINST OTHER CLINICALLY VALIDATED ATTENTION COGNITIVE TESTS. 4. THE DEGREE OF SHEARING IN THE RIGHT PRE-FRONTAL ANTERIOR WHITE MATTER DETECTED WITH MRI-DTI WILL CORRELATE WITH THE DEGREE OF IMPAIRED PREDICTIVE EYE TRACKING. 5. ACUTE MTBI, WITH AN ATTENTION IMPAIRMENT, WILL BE DETECTED BY MEASUREMENT OF PREDICTIVE EYE TRACKING. 6. ACUTE MTBI SUBJECTS STUDIED LONGITUDINALLY OVER A YEAR WITH RESOLUTION OF ATTENTION IMPAIRMENT WILL HAVE NORMALIZED PREDICTIVE EYE TRACKING.7. THE FULLY-INTEGRATED, PORTABLE EYE-TRACKING GOGGLES WILL HAVE THE ACCURACY AND RELIABILITY TO RAPIDLY ASSESS ATTENTION PERFORMANCE AND IDENTIFY INTRA-INDIVIDUAL CHANGES IN EYE MOVEMENT BEHAVIOR USING A PREDICTIVE VISUAL TRACKING PARADIGM. UPON COMPLETION OF THE PROPOSED STUDY WE PLAN TO DELIVER THE OPTIMIZED PORTABLE EYE-TRACKING GOGGLES THAT ARE PROVEN TO RAPIDLY AND ACCURATELY ASSESS ATTENTION PERFORMANCE AND TO DISTINGUISH TBI SUBJECTS IN COMPARISON TO NORMAL POPULATION VALUES.STUDY DESIGN THE EYE-TRAC GOGGLES WILL BE TESTED AT TWO MILITARY SITES AND COLLEGES AND HIGH SCHOOLS IN A LOCALIZED REGION THAT HAVE ATHLETES IN MULTIPLE SPORTS. BASELINE TESTING WILL BE DONE IN 5,000 MILITARY PERSONNEL AND 5,000 ATHLETES, AND RETESTING WILL BE PERFORMED IN BOTH SOLDIERS AND ATHLETES TO ASSESS RELIABILITY OF THE EYE-TRACKING PARADIGM AND GOGGLES. CONCUSSED ATHLETES WILL BE TESTED WITHIN 48 HOURS OR WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF THE INJURY AND A SUBSET OF MTBI SUBJECTS WILL COMPLETE FOLLOW-UP TESTING AT 1, 3, AND 12 MONTHS . IN ADDITION TO FIELD TESTING IN INTERSCHOLASTIC SPORTS AND MILITARY SITES, WE WILL ALSO TEST 360 NORMAL SUBJECTS FOR POSSIBLE EFFECT OF AGE AND EDUCATION ON EYE TRACKING PERFORMANCE. THERE WILL BE 60 SUBJECTS IN EACH OF THE FOLLOWING AGE GROUPS 7-11, 12-17, 18-35, 36-50, 51- 65 AND 66 PLUS. THE MALE TO FEMALE RATIO WILL BE 1:1 AND THERE WILL BE 120 SUBJECTS IN EACH OF THE FOLLOWING EDUCATION LEVELS: 12 YEARS AND UNDER, 13-16 YEARS AND 17 OR GREATER. ALL 360 NORMAL SUBJECTS WILL COMPLETE EYE-TRACKING WITH THE GOGGLES AND DESKTOP AT BASELINE AND WILL BE RE-TESTED WITH THE GOGGLES IN THE SAME TESTING SESSION. TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY ASSESSMENT OF THE EYE-TRAC GOGGLES WILL BE OBTAINED FROM THIS DATA. 120 OF THESE SUBJECTS WILL BE TESTED TWICE (AT BASELINE AND BETWEEN 1 AND 3 MONTHS AFTER BASELINE TESTING) TO ASSESS NORMAL TEMPORAL CHANGES IN EYE-TRACKING PERFORMANCE, AND WILL ALSO COMPLETE COGNITIVE TESTING AT BOTH TIMEPOINTS TO ESTABLISH VALIDITY OF THE EYE-TRACKING PARADIGM AS AN ATTENTION METRIC. TO ASSESS CORRELATION OF WHITE MATTER INTEGRITY WITH EYE-TRAC MEASURES, THESE 120 NORMAL SUBJECTS WILL COMPLETE AN MRI-DTI SCAN AT THE BASELINE TESTING SESSION ONLY. IN ADDITION, 140 SUBJECTS WITH ABNORMAL EYESIGHT (WITH 20 IN EACH OF THE FOLLOWING CONDITIONS: MYOPIA, PRESBYOPIA, FARSIGHTEDNESS, ASTIGMATISM, CONTACT LENS WEARER, COLOR BLINDNESS, AND MACULAR DEGENERATION) WILL BE TESTED AT BASELINE ONLY TO EXAMINE THE EFFECT OF EACH EYESIGHT VARIANT ON EYE-TRACKING PERFORMANCE. APPROXIMATELY 300 ACUTE MTBI SUBJECTS WILL BE RECRUITED FROM THE 5,000 BASELINE TESTED ATHLETES AND FROM THE EMERGENCY ROOMS (ER) AT TWO HOSPITALS IN NEW YORK. WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF INJURY ALL OF THESE SUBJECTS WILL COMPLETE EYE-TRACKING WITH THE GOGGLES AND DESKTOP AS WELL AS COGNITIVE TESTING FOR VALIDATION PURPOSES. A SUBSET OF THESE ATHLETES (N=120) WILL COMPLETE AN MRI-DTI SCAN ACUTELY TO ASSESS CORRELATION OF WHITE MATTER INTEGRITY WITH EYE-TRAC MEASURES. 180 OF THE 300 MTBI SUBJECTS WILL COMPLETE FOLLOW-UP TESTING AT 1, 3, AND 12 MONTHS OF INJURY. FOLLOW-UP TESTING WILL INCLUDE EYE-TRACKING AND COGNITIVE TESTING, AND A SUBSET OF THESE SUBJECTS WILL COMPLETE AN MRI-DTI SCAN AT EACH FOLLOW-UP TESTING SESSION TO ASSESS THE TEMPORAL COURSE OF WHITE MATTER RESOLUTION OR FURTHER DETERIORATION. THE KEY TO SUCCESSFUL EXECUTION OF THE PROPOSED PROTOCOL IN THE ATHLETIC FIELD TESTING IS THE TEAM OF MOBILE CLINICAL RESEARCH COORDINATORS WHO WILL RECRUIT AND TEST NORMAL SUBJECTS AND MTBI SUBJECTS, ORGANIZE THE CLINICAL RESEARCH ASSISTANTS, AND COORDINATE WITH SITE PIS IN RECRUITING CONCUSSED ATHLETES FOR ACUTE AND LONGITUDINAL TESTING. IN ADDITION, THE EYE-TRAC TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT TEAM (HARDWARE AND SOFTWARE) WILL COORDINATE WITH THE CLINICAL RESEARCHERS REGULARLY TO COLLECT, ASSESS AND INCORPORATE DATA FEEDBACK INTO THE GOGGLE DEVICE. THIS WILL CREATE AN EFFICIENT AND ITERATIVE FEEDBACK PROCESS, WHICH WILL ENSURE SUCCESSFUL EVALUATION AND REFINEMENT OF THE PORTABLE GOGGLES AT COMPLETION OF THE THREE YEAR PERFORMANCE PERIOD.SPECIFIC AIMSWE WILL ASSESS AND REFINE THE EYE-TRAC GOGGLES TO ENSURE A SENSITIVE, ACCURATE MEASUREMENT FOR ATTENTION IMPAIRMENT CAUSED BY MILD TBI. RECENT DATA SHOW EYE-TRAC TO BE A SENSITIVE METRIC OF DEFICITS IN EYE TRACKING TIMING VARIABILITY, REFLECTING DYSYNCHRONY IN THE ATTENTION NETWORK (1). THE PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OF THIS PROPOSED 36-MONTH PROJECT IS TO ACCOMPLISH THE FOLLOWING AIMS.SPECIFIC AIM 1: EYE-TRAC NORMATIVE DATA AND RELIABILITY: ESTABLISH A STATISTICALLY RELEVANT NORMATIVE DATABASE FOR EYE-TRAC. COLLECT EYE-TRAC DATA FROM THE GOGGLES AND DESKTOP FROM 5,000 NORMAL SOLDIERS AT TWO MILITARY BASES. DATA FROM AN ADDITIONAL 360 CIVILIAN NORMAL SUBJECTS WILL BE SIMILARLY COLLECTED. SOLDIERS AND CIVILIAN NORMAL SUBJECTS WILL BE RE-TESTED WITH THE GOGGLES IN THE SAME TESTING SESSION AND TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY OF THE EYE-TRAC GOGGLES WILL BE ESTABLISHED FROM THIS DATA. SPECIFIC AIM 2: EYE-TRAC VALIDITY: VALIDITY OF THE EYE-TRAC DATA FROM THE GOGGLES AND DESKTOP WILL BE DDesc

Prog Srvc Accom Acty2 ProgSrvcAccomActy2Grp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Expense$916,399ExpenseAmt
Revenue$4,690,753RevenueAmt
DescEYE-TRAC ADVANCE: TECHNOLOGY VERIFICATION1. OBJECTIVEWE PROPOSE TO PROSPECTIVELY STUDY A COHORT OF 18-25 YEAR OLD ATHLETES TO ESTABLISH THE RELIABILITY OF EYE-SYNC DATA AND THE UTILITY OF THE EYE-SYNC GOGGLES AS A SIDELINE CONCUSSION ASSESSMENT TOOL. A CLINICAL TRIAL WILL BE CONDUCTED TO 1) DETERMINE IF EYE-TRACKING, ASSESSED ON THE SIDELINE BY EYE-SYNC GOGGLES, IS A POTENTIAL MARKER OF INJURY THAT CAN BE USED IN CONJUNCTION WITH OTHER SIDELINE EVALUATIONS TO INFORM DECISIONS REGARDING REMOVAL OF ATHLETES FROM PLAY AND 2) TO USE THE EYE-SYNC GOGGLE DATA AS A POST- INJURY RECOVERY CURVE MONITOR.THE EXISTING EYE-TRAC ADVANCE (ETA) STUDY INCLUDES ACUTE EYE-SYNC DATA CAPTURE AT A SINGLE TIMEPOINT WITHIN TWO WEEKS OF A CONCUSSIVE EVENT, AND SUBSEQUENTLY AT 1, 3 AND 12 MONTHS. THIS PROPOSAL WOULD EXPAND THE CAPABILITIES OF ETA TO ALLOW FOR MULTIPLE OBSERVATIONS AND THE DEVELOPMENT OF INDIVIDUALIZED EYE-SYNC SCORE TRAJECTORIES IN THE CRITICAL FIRST 10 DAYS FOLLOWING INJURY. ADDITIONALLY, PERFORMANCE ON A TEST OF SIMPLE REACTION TIME (ANAM-SRT) AND SACCADIC EYE-MOVEMENT/ VISUAL TRACKING (KING DEVICK TEST), AND ACCELEROMETER DATA WILL BE OBTAINED AND CORRELATED WITH THE EYE-SYNC TEST. 2. BACKGROUNDTHE EFFECT OF MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (MTBI) OR CONCUSSION ON THE COGNITIVE FUNCTIONING OF ATHLETES IS A MAJOR AREA OF RECENT RESEARCH THAT HAS GAINED INCREASING ATTENTION IN THE MEDIA. UNITED STATES EMERGENCY DEPARTMENTS ENCOUNTER APPROXIMATELY 1.74 MILLION CASES OF MTBI ANNUALLY. NEARLY 100,000 SOLDIERS ACQUIRED AN MTBI BETWEEN 1997 AND 2007. THESE STATISTICS DO NOT TAKE INTO ACCOUNT TBI CASES THAT WENT UNREPORTED, WHICH MAY NUMBER AS MANY AS 3 MILLION FOR SPORTS-RELATED HEAD INJURIES[3][4] AND 40% FOR ACTIVE MILITARY MEMBERS. FORTY-EIGHT PERCENT OF COLLEGIATE ATHLETES REPORT EXPERIENCING AN IMPACT FOLLOWED BY SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS OF CONCUSSION; HOWEVER, ONLY 17% OF ATHLETES WERE CLINICALLY IDENTIFIED AS SUSTAINING A CONCUSSION. THERE IS A LACK OF UNDERSTANDING REGARDING THE MECHANISMS THAT CAUSE CONCUSSIVE SIGNS AND SYMPTOMS, AND THERE IS NO DEFINITIVE CONSENSUS ON HOW TO BEST EVALUATE OR TREAT AN INDIVIDUAL WITH CONCUSSION. STUDIES UTILIZING CT IMAGING FOR CONCUSSED INDIVIDUALS HAVE FOUND LESS THAN 15% OF THE PATIENTS HAVE VISIBLE TRAUMATIC LESIONS. AS A RESULT, IT IS DIFFICULT TO EVALUATE WHEN IT IS NECESSARY FOR AN ATHLETE TO BE REMOVED FROM PLAY AFTER A POSSIBLE HEAD INJURY. SPORTS-RELATED CONCUSSIONS ARE CURRENTLY VIEWED AS ONE OF THE MOST COMPLICATED INJURIES FACED BY ATHLETIC TRAINERS; THUS PUTTING A HEAVY DEPENDENCE ON SIDELINE DIAGNOSTIC TOOLS. EVALUATIVE TOOLS SUCH AS SPORTS CONCUSSION ASSESSMENT TOOL (SCAT)-3 TEST AS WELL AS THE IMMEDIATE POST-CONCUSSION AND COGNITIVE TESTING (IMPACT) HAVE BEEN WIDELY USED IN PROFESSIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ATHLETIC ORGANIZATIONS TO AID TRAINERS IN ASSESSING INJURED ATHLETES. THESE EVALUATIVE TOOLS INCLUDE COGNITIVE AND PHYSICAL QUESTIONS TO PROVIDE THE TRAINER WITH ADEQUATE INFORMATION PERTAINING TO THE ATHLETES' RETURN-TO-PLAY STATUS AS WELL AS THE ATHLETES' OVERALL HEALTH. HOWEVER, REVIEW OF RECENT LITERATURE SUGGESTS THAT UPON SERIAL ADMINISTRATION OF SIDELINE NEUROCOGNITIVE TESTS, ATHLETES SHOW INCREASED PERFORMANCE AS A RESULT OF A LEARNING EFFECT. FURTHERMORE, THERE IS EVIDENCE THAT ATHLETES MAY PURPOSEFULLY EXERT POOR EFFORT DURING BASELINE ASSESSMENTS, WHICH WOULD ULTIMATELY LEAD TO INACCURATE INTERPRETATIONS OF TEST SCORES FOLLOWING A POTENTIAL CONCUSSION. TO AVOID INACCURATE VARIABILITY IN PERFORMANCE THAT MAY COMPLICATE TRAINERS' DECISIONS, THERE IS A HIGH DEMAND FOR AN OBJECTIVE SIDELINE MEASURE TO BETTER DETERMINE THE OUTCOME OF AN ATHLETIC HEAD INJURY. THE CURRENT EYE-TRAC ADVANCE (ETA) STUDY USES A PREDICTIVE VISUAL TRACKING PARADIGM TO MEASURE DYNAMIC GAZE ERROR VARIABILITY. THE ADDITION OF ETA: TECHNOLOGY VERIFICATION WILL HELP TO FILL KNOWLEDGE GAPS THAT EXIST IN THE CURRENT ETA PROTOCOL AND CONTRIBUTE TO THE OVERALL GOAL OF ACCURATELY ASSESSING POSSIBLE IMPAIRMENT FOLLOWING A CONCUSSIVE EVENT.3. SPECIFIC AIMS AND DELIVERABLESSPECIFIC AIM 1: ESTABLISH RELIABILITY OF EYE-SYNC DATA (SEE PHASE 1A AND 1B)DELIVERABLE:(A) ESTABLISH GOGGLE DEVICE TEST-RETEST RELIABILITY(B) CORRELATE GOGGLE DATA WITH GOLD STANDARD DESKTOP EYE-TRACKING DATA AND SCAT-3.(C) QUANTIFY HUMAN PERFORMANCE VARIANCE AND LEARNING EFFECT(D) STUDY ENVIRONMENTAL AND EXERCISE EFFECTS IN A NON-CONTACT SETTING (TO MITIGATE CONFOUND OF SUB-CLINICAL HEAD IMPACTS IN UNDERSTANDING VARIANCE IN EYE-TRACKING SCORES DUE TO EXERCISE ALONE).(E) USE RESULTS TO INFORM STUDY DESIGN- OPTIMAL BASELINE TESTING SETTING(S)- EXCLUSION OF GLOBALLY NON-RELIABLE PARTICIPANTS (CANNOT PRODUCE CONSISTENT EYE-TRACKING SCORES UNDER NORMAL CONDITIONS)SPECIFIC AIM II: CAPTURE NON-CONCUSSIVE IMPACTS DURING FULL-CONTACT COMPETITION (AS MEASURED BY ACCELEROMETER DATA) TO DETECT IF THERE IS SIGNIFICANT CHANGE IN EYE-TRACKING SCORES BEFORE AND AFTER NON-CONCUSSIVE ATHLETIC EXPOSURES.DELIVERABLE:(A) CORRELATE EYE-SYNC GOGGLE DATA WITH BODY AND HEAD IMPACT DATA OBTAINED FROM SPECIALLY FITTED ACCELEROMETERS.SPECIFIC AIM III: TO CONDUCT A PRE-TEST/POST-TEST STUDY OF ATHLETES PARTICIPATING IN HIGH-IMPACT COMPETITION.DELIVERABLE:(A) DETERMINE THE DISCRIMINATORY POWER OF EYE-SYNC PERFORMANCE FOR DETECTING CONCUSSION AS MEASURED BY IMPAIRMENT OR SIGNIFICANT CHANGES FROM BASELINE ON THE KD, ANAM SRT OR SCAT-3 SCORES.- SENSITIVITY- SPECIFICITY- POSITIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE- NEGATIVE PREDICTIVE VALUE- INCREMENTAL VALIDITYUSING TIME SERIES ANALYSIS, PLOT THE RECOVERY CURVE OF EACH SUBJECT FOR EYE-SYNC GOGGLE DATA FOR MULTIPLE POST-CONCUSSIVE TIME POINTS.4. STUDY DESIGNCOHORT 1: PRELIMINARY DATA COLLECTION/ANALYSIS: EXPLORATORY GROUP (N=50)EYE-SYNC GOGGLE DATA AND SCAT-3 SYMPTOM REPORT DIFFERENCES (SEE PHASE 1A. AND 1B.) IN VARYING TESTING ENVIRONMENTS WILL INFORM FUTURE BASELINE TESTING DESIGN. DATA OBTAINED IN BOTH CONTACT AND NON-CONTACT SETTINGS (SEE 1B AND 1C) WILL CAPTURE MEASURES OF NON-CONCUSSIVE IMPACTS.USING THE RESULTS OBTAINED FROM 1A, WE WILL OPTIMIZE DATA COLLECTION METHODS FOR A FORMAL CLINICAL TRIAL. IF EYE-TRACKING PERFORMANCE SIGNIFICANTLY VARIES BETWEEN PHASE 1A AND 1B, THEN FUTURE BASELINE ENVIRONMENTS WILL TAKE PLACE IN BOTH CONTROLLED AND SIDELINE SETTINGS. IF EYE-TRACKING PERFORMANCE DOES NOT VARY SIGNIFICANTLY BETWEEN PHASE 1A AND 1B, THEN FUTURE BASELINE SESSIONS WILL ONLY TAKE PLACE IN A CONTROLLED SETTING.PHASE 1A: CONTROLLED SETTING TRAINING VISIT -7 DAYS PURPOSE: ESTABLISH PARTICIPANT RELIABLE INTER-DEVICE TESTING (CAPABLE OF PRODUCING A CONSISTENT SCORE ON BOTH THE GOGGLE AND THE DESKTOP). ESTABLISH GOGGLE AS RELIABLE BY COMPARING EYE-SYNC GOGGLE SCORE TO SCORE PRODUCED BY DESKTOP EYE-TRACKER. (A) COLLECT BASELINE HISTORY OF INJURY/DEMOGRAPHICS, AND SCAT-3 SYMPTOMS REPORT RESULTS.- TRAIN PARTICIPANTS TO COMPLETE EYE-SYNC TEST ON DESKTOP EYE-TRACKER IN A CONTROLLED OFFICE SETTING TO ESTABLISH TRUE SCORE (NON-CONCUSSED CEILING SCORE WHICH IS NO LONGER IMPACTED BY LEARNING CURVE AND PRACTICE EFFECTS). - TRAIN PARTICIPANTS TO COMPLETE EYE-SYNC TEST ON GOGGLE EYE-TRACKER IN A CONTROLLED OFFICE SETTING TO ESTABLISH TRUE SCORE (NON-CONCUSSED CEILING SCORE WHICH IS NO LONGER IMPACTED BY LEARNING CURVE AND PRACTICE EFFECTS).NOTE: SUBJECTS TEST ADMINISTRATION (GOGGLES/DESKTOP) WILL BE COUNTERBALANCED TO ACCOUNT FOR THE POSSIBLE EFFECTS OF FATIGUE OR OTHER FACTORS CONTRIBUTING TO SCORE VARIANCE BASED ON TEST ORDER.PHASE 1B: NON-CONTACT PRACTICE SIDELINE SETTING VISIT (TAKEN ON FIELD/COURT PRE AND POST NON-CONTACT PRACTICE WITH PHYSICAL EXERTION)PURPOSE: ESTABLISH PARTICIPANT EYE-SYNC SCORE IN A NATURALISTIC SIDELINE SETTING FOLLOWING PHYSICAL EXERTION WHILE CONTROLLING FOR POSSIBLE HEAD IMPACTS. COLLECT BASELINE HEAD ACCELEROMETER DATA FOR NON-IMPACT GAME LIKE ACTIVITY. 1. OUTFIT ALL SUBJECTS WITH HEAD ACCELEROMETERS AND COLLECT IMPACT DATA TO QUANTIFY HEAD ACCELERATION IN NON-IMPACT EXERCISE IN ORDER TO CONFIRM TESTING CONDITION OF NON-CONTACT PRACTICE. (THIS AIMS TO REMOVE THE HEAD IMPACT VARIABLE FROM EXERCISE EFFECT ANALYSIS) 2. COLLECT EYE-SYNC GOGGLE DATA AND SCAT 3 SYMPTOM REPORT PRE AND POST A NON-CONTACT PRACTICE.3. ANALYZE EYE-SYNC GOGGLE DATA AND SCAT 3 SYMPTOM REPORT SCORES FROM SIDELINE SETTING AND COMPARE TO CONTROLLED OFFICE SETTING. MAKE DETERMINATION IF SCORES ARE SIGNIFICANTLY DIFFERENT TO NECESSITATE NEED FOR BASELINE TESTING TO BE CONDUCTED IN SIDELINE/EXERCISE SETTING.PHASE 1C: CONTACT GAME SIDELINE SETTING VISIT (CAPTURED ON FIELD/COURT POST CONTACT GAME)PURPOSE: ESTABLISH PARTICIPANT EYE-SYNC SCORE IN A NATURALISTIC SIDELINE SETTING FOLLOWING PHYSICAL EXERTION WITH INTRODUCTION OF POTENTIAL HEAD IMPACT (BOTH SUB-CONCUSSIVE AND CONCUSSIVE). COLLECT BASELINE HEAD ACCELEROMETER DATA FOR FULL-CONTACT GAME ACTIVITY. 1. OUTFIT ALL SUBJECTS WITH HEAD ACCELEROMETERS AND COLLECT IMPACT DATA TO QUANTIFY HEAD ACCELERATION IN CONTACT PLAY VERSUS NON-CONTACT PRACTICE.2. COLLECT EYE-SYNC GOGGLE DATA AND SCAT 3 SYMPTOM REPORT PRE AND POST FUDesc

Prog Srvc Accom Acty3 ProgSrvcAccomActy3Grp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Expense$122,019ExpenseAmt
DescCONCUSSION PROPOSAL: THERE ARE APPROXIMATELY 2 MILLION EMERGENCY DEPARTMENT (ED) VISITS A YEAR IN THE UNITED STATES FOR HEAD INJURY; IT IS ESTIMATED THAT OVER THE PAST TEN YEARS APPROXIMATELY 170,000 SOLDIERS HAVE SUSTAINED A TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY (TBI).1 THESE NUMBERS GROSSLY UNDERESTIMATE THE TRUE INCIDENCE OF TBI IN THAT THE MAJORITY OF THESE PATIENTS DO NOT SEEK IMMEDIATE ATTENTION AT A HEALTH CARE FACILITY. RECENT LITERATURE HAS DEMONSTRATED THAT PATIENTS WHO SUSTAIN A TBI MAY BE SUSCEPTIBLE TO DELAYED MANIFESTATIONS OF THE INJURY INCLUDING BEHAVIORAL AND COGNITIVE DISABILITIES.ATHLETES AND SOLDERS ARE AT HIGH RISK FOR BOTH INITIAL AND REPEAT HEAD INJURY SOME OF WHICH MAY BE CATASTROPHIC. SEVERAL YEARS AGO, ZACKERY LYSTEDT, A MIDDLE-SCHOOL FOOTBALL PLAYER, SUSTAINED A TBI DURING A GAME. HE WAS DIAGNOSED WITH A "SECOND IMPACT CONCUSSION." THREE YEARS LATER HE IS WHEELCHAIR-BOUND, AND PROFOUNDLY DISABLED. SUBSEQUENTLY THE STATE OF WASHINGTON ADOPTED THE "ZACKERY LYSTEDT LAW" WHICH SPECIFIES THAT THE APPROVAL OF A MEDICAL PROFESSIONAL IS REQUIRED BEFORE ANY YOUNG ATHLETE WITH SIGNS OF CONCUSSION CAN RETURN TO THE GAME. THE LAW IS PREDICATED ON THE DEFINITION OF A CONCUSSION AND POSES A FUNDAMENTAL PUBLIC POLICY QUESTION I.E. DOES A SINGLE EVENT REPRESENT SOMETHING UNIQUE AND UNCOMMON OR DOES IT CALL TO ATTENTION A PUBLIC HEALTH CONCERN THAT NEEDS TO BE ADDRESSED. WELL DESIGNED RESEARCH IS NEEDED TO ANSWER THESE TYPES OF QUESTIONS.IN 2007-2008, THE CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL, FUNDED A MULTI-DISCIPLINARY GROUP TO DEVELOP A PRACTICE GUIDELINE ON THE DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF MILD TRAUMATIC BRAIN INJURY. 3 THIS TASK FORCE USED WELL DEFINED METHODOLOGY TO GENERATE EVIDENCE BASED GUIDELINES. THE GUIDELINE PROCESS UNCOVERED A NUMBER OF CHALLENGES WHICH CONFRONT THE MEDICAL COMMUNITY IN DIAGNOSING AND TREATING TBI, THE MOST BASIC OF WHICH IS WHAT IS THE DEFINITION OF A "MILD" TBI AND DOES IT DIFFER FROM A CONCUSSION. TYPES OF QUESTIONS UNCOVERED DURING THIS PROCESS INCLUDED, "IS CONCUSSION A CLINICAL DIAGNOSIS OR A DIAGNOSTIC TEST DEFINITION?; "IS PROGNOSIS THE SAME FOR A PATIENTS WITH A MILD TBI ON CLINICAL EXAM THE SAME REGARDLESS OF NEUROIMAGING OR SERUM BIOMARKER FINDINGS?" "ARE THERE PREDICTORS OF COGNITIVE OR BEHAVIORAL SEQUELAE AND ARE THERE INTERVENTIONS THAT WOULD CHANGE THE OUTCOME?" PART OF THE DIFFICULTY IN EVEN BEGINNING TO ANSWER THESE QUESTIONS AND OTHERS IS THAT THE LITERATURE HAS NO STANDARDIZED DEFINITION AND THE HETEROGENEITY OF STUDY DESIGN PRECLUDE META-ANALYSIS OF DATABASES. MULTIPLE DEFINITIONS FOR THE TERM "CONCUSSION" EXIST FROM SOURCES INCLUDING THE AMERICAN ACADEMY OF NEUROLOGY, AMERICAN CONGRESS OF REHABILITATION MEDICINE, CENTERS FOR DISEASE CONTROL AND PREVENTION, DEFENSE AND VETERANS BRAIN INJURY CENTER, AND THE WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION. HOWEVER, ALL APPEAR TO HAVE BEEN DEVELOPED THROUGH CONSENSUS PROCESSES, AND ALL, TO VARYING DEGREES, LACK OPERATIONAL CRITERIA.SPORTS INJURIES, TOGETHER WITH BLAST INJURIES AND OTHER "MILD" BRAIN TRAUMAS HAVE SPAWNED A GROWING AWARENESS OF CONCUSSION AND MILD TBI AS A SERIOUS PUBLIC HEALTH PROBLEM. HOWEVER, SCREENING, DIAGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT SUFFER FROM WIDESPREAD PRACTICE VARIATION, SIGNALING SUBSTANTIAL UNDERLYING UNCERTAINTY ABOUT THE DISEASE. USEFUL RESEARCH ABOUT CONCUSSION AND MILD TBI CAN ONLY PROCEED FROM A UNIFORM DEFINITION DERIVED FROM EVIDENCE ABOUT PATIENT AND DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS, INCIDENCE AND PREVALENCE, AND OUTCOMES.NEITHER THE TERM "CONCUSSION" NOR "MILD TBI" PROVIDE A CLEAR DEFINITION TO ENABLE RESEARCHERS, CLINICIANS AND SPORTS SUPERVISORS THE ABILITY TO PROPERLY ADDRESS THIS PUBLIC EPIDEMIC. THE TERM "CONCUSSION" DOES NOT PROVIDE CLEAR INDICATORS OF THE FUNCTIONAL DEFICITS THAT WOULD BE USED TO ASSESS DIAGNOSTICS, THERAPEUTICS AND LONG-TERM NEUROLOGICAL SEQUELAE.WE PROPOSE TO USE SYSTEMATIC METHODS TO CREATE AN EVIDENCE-BASED DEFINITION OF "CONCUSSION." THE GOAL IS TO PROVIDE A CLEAR DEFINITION THAT WILL ENABLE RESEARCHERS, CLINICIANS, AND ATHLETIC SUPERVISORS TO ADDRESS QUESTIONS OF IDENTIFICATION, SCREENING, DIAGNOSIS, PROGNOSIS, AND TREATMENT. WE PROPOSE TO CONDUCT THE PROJECT IN FIVE PHASES - INITIATION, SURVEILLANCE, SPECIFICATION, DEFINITION, AND DISSEMINATION.INITIATION PHASE: IN THIS PHASE, A MULTI-DISCIPLINARY TASK FORCE WILL BE IDENTIFIED AND ASSEMBLED. THE TASK FORCE WILL REPRESENT THE SPECTRUM OF SPECIALTIES WITH AN INTEREST IN TBI WHO WILL LEND THEIR EXPERTISE TO IDENTIFYING CRITICAL QUESTIONS RELEVANT TO CARE AND TO FUTURE RESEARCH. THE TASK FORCE WILL INCLUDE REPRESENTATIVES FROM THE SPECIALTIES OF EMERGENCY MEDICINE, NEUROSURGERY, NEUROLOGY, PSYCHIATRY, NEUROPSYCHOLOGY, REHABILITATION MEDICINE,SPORTS MEDICINE, PEDIATRICS, AND FAMILY MEDICINE. SURVEILLANCE PHASE. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PHASE IS TO IDENTIFY THE VARIATION IN HOW THE SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE CHARACTERIZES THE DISEASE. A MEDLINE SEARCH WILL BE CONDUCTED TO IDENTIFY LARGE, PROSPECTIVE COHORT DATABASES OF PATIENTS WITH "CONCUSSION OR "MILD TBI." FROM THOSE STUDIES WE WILL BE ABLE TO IDENTIFY VARIATIONS IN:PATIENT POPULATIONSRISK FACTORSMECHANISMS OF INJURYDEFINITIONS USEDSCREENINGDIAGNOSIS OR IDENTIFICATION OF CONCUSSIONENTRY POINT INTO STUDIESTIMING OF ASSESSMENTSSYMPTOMS AND OTHER INDICATIONSDISEASE CHARACTERISTICSOUTCOMES AND OUTCOME MEASUREMENTSTHE VARIATIONS IN THE ABOVE CATEGORIES WILL BE PRESENTED TO THE TASK FORCE AS THE SPECTRUM OF POSSIBLE PARAMETERS FOR THE SPECIFICATION PHASE.SPECIFICATION PHASE. THE PURPOSE OF THIS PHASE IS TO ESTABLISH THE PARAMETERS WE WILL USE TO CREATE THE DEFINITION OF "CONCUSSION." EXAMPLES/CANDIDATE PARAMETERS THAT WILL BE CONSIDERED INCLUDE:PATIENT POPULATIONS- >= 14 YEARS OLDRISK FACTORS- PREVIOUS CONCUSSIONMECHANISMS OF INJURY- ANY FORCE, NOT NECESSARILY IMPACT, TO THE HEADSCREENING- AWAKE AT TIME OF ASSESSMENTDIAGNOSIS OR IDENTIFICATION OF CONCUSSION - IN THE ED, BY OBSERVATION, BY SELF REPORTGCS- ENTRY POINT INTO STUDIES; TIMING OF ENTRYDISEASE CHARACTERISTICS- LOSS OF CONSCIOUSNESS OR NOTOUTCOMES- POST TRAUMATIC AMNESIA AND/OR ATTENTION DEFICITSOUTCOME MEASUREMENTS- COGNITIVE ASSESSMENTS SIMILAR TO ABOVETHE PARAMETERS WILL DETERMINE WHICH OF THE STUDIES FROM THE LITERATURE SEARCH IN SURVEILLANCE PHASE WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE FINAL EVIDENTIARY TABLE / LIBRARY AND USED AS EVIDENCE FOR THE DEFINITION PHASE.WE WILL ASSESS THE INCLUDED STUDIES FROM THE SPECIFICATION PHASE TO DETERMINE THEIR POTENTIAL FOR BIAS AND THE LEVEL OF CONFIDENCE IN THE REPORTED FINDINGS, USING TWO DISTINCT ASSESSMENT METHODS:#1. EPIDEMIOLOGIC STUDIES. THE TWO KEY CRITERIA FOR ASSESSING THE QUALITY OF DESCRIPTIVE SURVEILLANCE DATABASES ARE (A) DID THE SAMPLE INCLUDE ALL POSSIBLE PARTICIPANTS, OR WAS ENTRY SELECTED IN SOME WAY, AND (B) WHAT ARE THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE SCREENING AND DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURES/INSTRUMENTS USED#2. CORRELATIONAL STUDIES. WE WILL ASSESS THE QUALITY OF THE STUDIES THAT ASSOCIATE RISK FACTORS WITH DISEASE, AND INDICATORS WITH OUTCOME, USING A 6-DOMAIN INSTRUMENT TO ASSESS THE POTENTIAL FOR BIAS IN PROGNOSTIC STUDIES. THE DOMAINS ARE (1) PATIENT SELECTION METHODS, (2) PROGNOSTIC FACTOR MEASUREMENT, (3) OUTCOME MEASUREMENT, (4) FOLLOW-UP, (5) ANALYSIS AND REPORTING, AND (6) MEASUREMENT OF CONFOUNDERS. THE STUDIES WITH THE LOWEST POTENTIAL FOR BIAS WILL BE USED TO CRAFT THE DEFINITION OF CONCUSSION.DEFINITION PHASE: DURING THIS PHASE, A WORKING DEFINITION WILL BE DERIVED FOR "CONCUSSION" WHICH WILL ENABLE COMMUNICATION IN BOTH CLINICAL AND RESEARCH ARENAS. A DETERMINATION WILL BE MADE REGARDING THE COMMONALITY OR DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE TERMS CONCUSSION AND MILD TBI: FOR EXAMPLE, THE TASK FORCE WILL DETERMINE WHETHER A CONCUSSION DIFFERS FROM A MILD TBI BASED ON EVIDENCE OF QUANTIFIABLE INJURY E.G., NEUROIMAGING, BIOMARKERS, ATTENTION TESTING. A DEFINITION FOR POST-CONCUSSIVE SYMPTOMS AND POST CONCUSSIVE SYNDROME WILL ALSO BE EXPLORED AS WELL AS PREDICTORS OF THESE PROCESSES.EVIDENCE BASED SURVEILLANCE OF LITERATURE WILL ENABLE THE FOLLOWING:CLARIFY TERMS BASED ON PREVALENCE OF PARAMETEROUTCOME MEASURE(S)PROGNOSISINCLUSION CRITERIA TO BE ANALYZED:OBSERVED HEAD TRAUMAAWAKE: GCS 13-15AGE>14OBJECTIVE ASSESSMENT+/- LOCTIME OF ASSESSMENTTHE FOLLOWING AREAS WILL BE STUDIED DURING THE DEFINITION PHASE:PREVALENCE OF COGNITIVE OR NEUROLOGICAL DEFICIT FOLLOWING HEAD TRAUMAPREVALENCE OF SYMPTOMS RELATED TO CONCUSSION THAT PERSISTS FOR MORE THAN 3 MONTHS.PREVALENCE OF ACUTE TRAUMATIC BRAIN LESION ON NEUROIMAGING POST CONCUSSIONPREVALENCE OF ELEVATED BIOMARKERS POST CONCUSSIONDISSEMINATION PHASE: KEY TO THE PROPOSED PROJECT IS A PROACTIVELY DETERMINED DISSEMINATION STRATEGY. AT THE CONCLUSION OF THIS PROCESS A MANUSCRIPT, SLIDE SET, AND TEACHING AIDS WILL BE PREPARED. THESE MATERIALS WILL BE DISSEMINATION THROUGH THE FOLLOWING CHANNELS:A CONFERENCE WHERE THE PROCESS AND CONCLUSIONS WILL BE PRESENTED, VIDEOTAPED, MAINSTREAMED ON THE WEBA PEER REVIEWED MANUSCRIPTAN ABSTRACTION OF THE FINDING SUBMITTED TO ALL OF THE SOCIETY ORGANIZATIONS PARTICIPATDesc

Prog Srvc Accom Acty Other ProgSrvcAccomActyOtherGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
DescTHE PRIMARY TOOL OF BTF'S QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM, A CLINICAL DATABASE, IS A SECURE INTERNET BASED DATABASE THAT PERMITS A TRAUMA CENTER TO EXAMINE ITS OWN PERFORMANCE AS WELL AS BENCHMARK WITH OTHER INSTITUTIONS. TBI-TRAC IS DESIGNED TO HELP TRAUMA CENTERS MEASURE AND MONITOR THEIR PERFORMANCE ON KEY CLINICAL INDICATORS BASED ON ESTABLISHED EVIDENCE-BASED GUIDELINES. PARTICIPANTS USE TBI-TRAC AS A ROUTINE PART OF THEIR ONGOING MONITORING AND EVALUATION ACTIVITIES TO IDENTIFY OPPORTUNITIES FOR IMPROVEMENT AND FOR SHARING INFORMATION WITH CLINICAL DEPARTMENT CHAIRS, QUALITY PERFORMANCE COORDINATORS, AND SENIOR ADMINISTRATION. CENTERS CAN COMBINE TBI-TRAC DATA WITH OTHER INTERNAL DATA SOURCES TO REVEAL COST SAVINGS OPPORTUNITIES ASSOCIATED WITH IMPROVEMENT STRATEGIES.Desc
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Program Service Expenses$6,036,577TotalProgramServiceExpensesAmt
Described In Section501c3Yes (1)DescribedInSection501c3Ind
Schedule B RequiredYes (1)ScheduleBRequiredInd
Political Campaign Acty0PoliticalCampaignActyInd
Lobbying Activities0LobbyingActivitiesInd
Subject To Proxy Tax0SubjectToProxyTaxInd
Donor Advised Fund0DonorAdvisedFundInd
Conservation Easements0ConservationEasementsInd
Collections Of Art0CollectionsOfArtInd
Credit Counseling0CreditCounselingInd
Temp Or Permanent Endowments0TempOrPermanentEndowmentsInd
Report Land Building EquipmentYes (1)ReportLandBuildingEquipmentInd
Report Investments Other Sec0ReportInvestmentsOtherSecInd
Report Program Related Invst0ReportProgramRelatedInvstInd
Report Other Assets0ReportOtherAssetsInd
Report Other LiabilitiesYes (1)ReportOtherLiabilitiesInd
Include FIN48 FootnoteYes (1)IncludeFIN48FootnoteInd
Independent Audit Fincl StmtYes (1)IndependentAuditFinclStmtInd
Consolidated Audit Fincl Stmt0ConsolidatedAuditFinclStmtInd
School Operating0SchoolOperatingInd
Foreign Office0ForeignOfficeInd
Foreign Activities0ForeignActivitiesInd
More Than5000 K To Org0MoreThan5000KToOrgInd
More Than5000 K To Individuals0MoreThan5000KToIndividualsInd
Professional Fundraising0ProfessionalFundraisingInd
Fundraising Activities0FundraisingActivitiesInd
Gaming Activities0GamingActivitiesInd
Operate Hospital0OperateHospitalInd
Grants To Organizations0GrantsToOrganizationsInd
Grants To IndividualsYes (1)GrantsToIndividualsInd
Schedule J RequiredYes (1)ScheduleJRequiredInd
Tax Exempt Bonds0TaxExemptBondsInd
Engaged In Excess Benefit Trans0EngagedInExcessBenefitTransInd
PY Excess Benefit Trans0PYExcessBenefitTransInd
Loan OutstandingYes (1)LoanOutstandingInd
Grant To Related Person0GrantToRelatedPersonInd
Business Rln With Org Mem0BusinessRlnWithOrgMemInd
Business Rln With Fam Mem0BusinessRlnWithFamMemInd
Business Rln With Officer EntYes (1)BusinessRlnWithOfficerEntInd
Deductible Non Cash Contri0DeductibleNonCashContriInd
Deductible Art Contribution0DeductibleArtContributionInd
Terminate Operations0TerminateOperationsInd
Partial Liquidation0PartialLiquidationInd
Disregarded Entity0DisregardedEntityInd
Related Entity0RelatedEntityInd
Related Organization Ctrl Ent0RelatedOrganizationCtrlEntInd
Trnsfr Exmpt Non Chrtbl Rltd Org0TrnsfrExmptNonChrtblRltdOrgInd
Activities Conducted Prtshp0ActivitiesConductedPrtshpInd
Schedule O RequiredYes (1)ScheduleORequiredInd
IRP Document26IRPDocumentCnt
IRP Document W2 G0IRPDocumentW2GCnt
Employee40EmployeeCnt
Employment Tax Returns FiledYes (1)EmploymentTaxReturnsFiledInd
Unrelated Bus Incm Over Limit0UnrelatedBusIncmOverLimitInd
Foreign Financial Account0ForeignFinancialAccountInd
Prohibited Tax Shelter Trans0ProhibitedTaxShelterTransInd
Taxable Party Notification0TaxablePartyNotificationInd
Nondeductible Contributions0NondeductibleContributionsInd
Quid Pro Quo Contributions0QuidProQuoContributionsInd
Form8282 Property Disposed Of0Form8282PropertyDisposedOfInd
Rcv Fnds To Pay Prsnl Bnft Cntrct0RcvFndsToPayPrsnlBnftCntrctInd
Pay Premiums Prsnl Bnft Cntrct0PayPremiumsPrsnlBnftCntrctInd
Indoor Tanning Services0IndoorTanningServicesInd
Info In Schedule O Part VIYes (X)InfoInScheduleOPartVIInd
Governing Body Voting Members10GoverningBodyVotingMembersCnt
Independent Voting Member9IndependentVotingMemberCnt
Family Or Business RlnYes (1)FamilyOrBusinessRlnInd
Delegation Of Mgmt Duties0DelegationOfMgmtDutiesInd
Change To Org Documents0ChangeToOrgDocumentsInd
Material Diversion Or Misuse0MaterialDiversionOrMisuseInd
Members Or Stockholders0MembersOrStockholdersInd
Election Of Board Members0ElectionOfBoardMembersInd
Decisions Subject To Approva0DecisionsSubjectToApprovaInd
Minutes Of Governing BodyYes (1)MinutesOfGoverningBodyInd
Minutes Of CommitteesYes (1)MinutesOfCommitteesInd
Officer Mailing Address0OfficerMailingAddressInd
Local Chapters0LocalChaptersInd
Form990 Provided To Gvrn BodyYes (1)Form990ProvidedToGvrnBodyInd
Conflict Of Interest PolicyYes (1)ConflictOfInterestPolicyInd
Annual Disclosure Covered PrsnYes (1)AnnualDisclosureCoveredPrsnInd
Regular Monitoring EnfrcYes (1)RegularMonitoringEnfrcInd
Whistleblower PolicyYes (1)WhistleblowerPolicyInd
Document Retention PolicyYes (1)DocumentRetentionPolicyInd
Compensation Process CEOYes (1)CompensationProcessCEOInd
Compensation Process Other0CompensationProcessOtherInd
Investment In Joint Venture0InvestmentInJointVentureInd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldNYStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
States Where Copy Of Return Is FldCAStatesWhereCopyOfReturnIsFldCd
Other WebsiteYes (X)OtherWebsiteInd
Upon RequestYes (X)UponRequestInd

Books In Care Of Detail BooksInCareOfDetail

Business Name BusinessName

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1JAMSHID GHAJAR MD PHDBusinessNameLine1Txt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Phone4083699735PhoneNum

US Address USAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line11999 S BASCOM AVENUE NO 1040AddressLine1Txt
CityCAMPBELLCityNm
State AbbreviationCAStateAbbreviationCd
ZIP95008ZIPCd

Form990 Part VII Section A Form990PartVIISectionAGrp (15 entries)

TitleTitleTxtAverage Hours Per WeekAverageHoursPerWeekRtIndividual Trustee Or DirectorIndividualTrusteeOrDirectorIndOfficerOfficerIndReportable Comp From OrgReportableCompFromOrgAmtReportable Comp From Rltd OrgReportableCompFromRltdOrgAmtOther CompensationOtherCompensationAmtHighest Compensated EmployeeHighestCompensatedEmployeeInd
JAMSHID GHAJAR MD PHD
PRESIDENT40.00Yes (X)Yes (X)$365,719$0$5,811
FRANCOIS M CHATEAU
SECRETARY0.50Yes (X)Yes (X)$0$0$0
EDGAR CULLMAN JR
TREASURER THRU JULY 20150.50Yes (X)Yes (X)$0$0$0
ALAN G QUASHA
CHAIRMAN/TREASURER AS JULY 20150.50Yes (X)Yes (X)$0$0$0
PAUL MANAFORT
DIRECTOR0.50Yes (X)$0$0$0
SARAH JESSICA PARKER
DIRECTOR0.50Yes (X)$0$0$0
GEORGE SOROS
DIRECTOR0.50Yes (X)$0$0$0
DEBORAH WARD
DIRECTOR0.50Yes (X)$0$0$0
ELIZABETH H VAN MERKENSTEIJN
DIRECTOR0.50Yes (X)$0$0$0
CHRISTINA H WILSON
DIRECTOR0.50Yes (X)$0$0$0
PAMELA J NEWMAN
DIRECTOR0.50Yes (X)$0$0$0
KATHELEEN STEVENS
CFO40.00Yes (X)$180,252$0$0
JUN MARUTA
SCIENTIST40.00$125,231$0$1,801Yes (X)
IRENE D TSERETOPOULOS
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIST40.00$107,225$0$5,819Yes (X)
MEREDITH KLEIN
EDUCATION DIRECTOR40.00$120,252$0$88Yes (X)
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Reportable Comp From Org$898,679TotalReportableCompFromOrgAmt
Tot Reportable Comp Rltd Org$0TotReportableCompRltdOrgAmt
Total Other Compensation$13,519TotalOtherCompensationAmt
Indiv Rcvd Greater Than100 K5IndivRcvdGreaterThan100KCnt
Former Ofcr Employees Listed0FormerOfcrEmployeesListedInd
Total Comp Greater Than150 KYes (1)TotalCompGreaterThan150KInd
Compensation From Other Srcs0CompensationFromOtherSrcsInd

Contractor Compensation ContractorCompensationGrp (5 entries)

Address Line1ContractorAddress/USAddress/AddressLine1TxtCityContractorAddress/USAddress/CityNmState AbbreviationContractorAddress/USAddress/StateAbbreviationCdZIPContractorAddress/USAddress/ZIPCdServicesServicesDescCompensationCompensationAmt
STANFORD UNIVERSITY
450 SERRA MALLSTANFORDCA94305RESEARCH SERVICES$1,367,208
OREGON HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSIRY
0690 SW BANCROFT STREET MC L106SPAPORTLANDOR97239RESEARCH SERVICES$911,954
THE GENEVA FOUNDATION
917 PACIFIC AVE STE 600TACOMAWA98402RESEARCH SERVICES$268,981
NY NEUROSCIENCE ASSOCIATES PC
705 OAK KNOLL LANEMENLO PARKCA94025RESEARCH SERVICES$245,497
PORTLAND STATE UNIVERSITY
1825 SW BROADWAYPORTLANDOR97232RESEARCH SERVICES$230,557
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Cntrct Rcvd Greater Than100 K8CntrctRcvdGreaterThan100KCnt
All Other Contributions$91,890AllOtherContributionsAmt
Total Contributions$91,890TotalContributionsAmt

Program Service Revenue ProgramServiceRevenueGrp (2 entries)

DescDescBusinessBusinessCdTotal Revenue ColumnTotalRevenueColumnAmtRelated Or Exempt Func IncomeRelatedOrExemptFuncIncomeAmt
EYE TRAC ADVANCE RESEA541700$4,690,753$4,690,753
EYE TRAC RESEARCH STUD541700$2,964,751$2,964,751
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Program Service Revenue$7,655,504TotalProgramServiceRevenueAmt

Investment Income InvestmentIncomeGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Revenue Column$511TotalRevenueColumnAmt
Exclusion$511ExclusionAmt

Royalties Revenue RoyaltiesRevenueGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Revenue Column$6,525TotalRevenueColumnAmt
Exclusion$6,525ExclusionAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Gross Sales Of Inventory$2,880GrossSalesOfInventoryAmt
Cost Of Goods Sold$909CostOfGoodsSoldAmt

Net Income Or Loss NetIncomeOrLossGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Revenue Column$1,971TotalRevenueColumnAmt
Related Or Exempt Func Income$1,971RelatedOrExemptFuncIncomeAmt

Other Revenue Misc OtherRevenueMiscGrp (2 entries)

DescDescBusinessBusinessCdTotal Revenue ColumnTotalRevenueColumnAmtExclusionExclusionAmt
MISCELLANEOUS INCOME900099$249$249
CONTINUING EDUCATION900099$70$70
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Other Revenue Total$319OtherRevenueTotalAmt

Total Revenue TotalRevenueGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Revenue Column$7,756,720TotalRevenueColumnAmt
Related Or Exempt Func Income$7,657,475RelatedOrExemptFuncIncomeAmt
Unrelated Business Revenue$0UnrelatedBusinessRevenueAmt
Exclusion$7,355ExclusionAmt

Grants To Domestic Individuals GrantsToDomesticIndividualsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$20,000TotalAmt
Program Services$20,000ProgramServicesAmt

Comp Current Ofcr Directors CompCurrentOfcrDirectorsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$551,782TotalAmt
Program Services$406,230ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$145,552ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Comp Disqual Persons CompDisqualPersonsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$245,497TotalAmt
Management And General$245,497ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Other Salaries And Wages OtherSalariesAndWagesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$1,912,276TotalAmt
Program Services$1,407,754ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$504,522ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Other Employee Benefits OtherEmployeeBenefitsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$248,857TotalAmt
Program Services$184,341ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$64,516ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Payroll Taxes PayrollTaxesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$184,117TotalAmt
Program Services$136,385ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$47,732ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Fees For Services Legal FeesForServicesLegalGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$36,247TotalAmt
Program Services$3,258ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$32,989ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Fees For Services Accounting FeesForServicesAccountingGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$52,125TotalAmt
Program Services$4,685ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$47,440ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Fees For Services Other FeesForServicesOtherGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$521,761TotalAmt
Program Services$357,809ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$163,952ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Office Expenses OfficeExpensesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$140,849TotalAmt
Program Services$6,524ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$134,325ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Information Technology InformationTechnologyGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$273,619TotalAmt
Program Services$172,220ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$101,399ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Occupancy OccupancyGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$285,981TotalAmt
Management And General$285,981ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Travel TravelGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$285,501TotalAmt
Program Services$190,287ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$95,214ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Conferences Meetings ConferencesMeetingsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$19,618TotalAmt
Program Services$19,618ProgramServicesAmt

Interest InterestGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$441TotalAmt
Program Services$94ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$347ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Depreciation Depletion DepreciationDepletionGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$196,943TotalAmt
Program Services$153,119ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$43,824ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Insurance InsuranceGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$31,941TotalAmt
Management And General$31,941ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Other Expenses OtherExpensesGrp (4 entries)

DescDescTotalTotalAmtProgram ServicesProgramServicesAmtManagement And GeneralManagementAndGeneralAmt
RESEARCH SUBCONTRACTS$2,841,732$2,841,732
RESEARCH AND TESTING CO$136,274$132,494$3,780
MOVING EXPENSES$20,668$20,668
REPAIRS & MAINTENANCE$16,099$16,099

All Other Expenses AllOtherExpensesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$883TotalAmt
Program Services$27ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$856ManagementAndGeneralAmt

Total Functional Expenses TotalFunctionalExpensesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total$8,023,211TotalAmt
Program Services$6,036,577ProgramServicesAmt
Management And General$1,986,634ManagementAndGeneralAmt
Fundraising$0FundraisingAmt

Cash Non Interest Bearing CashNonInterestBearingGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$5,094,955BOYAmt
EOY$714,769EOYAmt

Savings And Temp Cash Invst SavingsAndTempCashInvstGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$1,887,003BOYAmt
EOY$1,937,244EOYAmt

Pledges And Grants Receivable PledgesAndGrantsReceivableGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$748BOYAmt

Accounts Receivable AccountsReceivableGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$1,128,058BOYAmt
EOY$1,211,311EOYAmt

Rcvbl From Disqualified Prsn RcvblFromDisqualifiedPrsnGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
EOY$15,703EOYAmt

Inventories For Sale Or Use InventoriesForSaleOrUseGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$56,379BOYAmt

Prepaid Expenses Defrd Charges PrepaidExpensesDefrdChargesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$43,877BOYAmt
EOY$52,943EOYAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Land Bldg Equip Cost Or Other Bss$2,060,386LandBldgEquipCostOrOtherBssAmt
Land Bldg Equip Accum Deprec$678,205LandBldgEquipAccumDeprecAmt

Land Bldg Equip Basis Net LandBldgEquipBasisNetGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$225,367BOYAmt
EOY$1,382,181EOYAmt

Investments Other Securities InvestmentsOtherSecuritiesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$400BOYAmt
EOY$400EOYAmt

Other Assets Total OtherAssetsTotalGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$58,000BOYAmt
EOY$51,008EOYAmt

Total Assets TotalAssetsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$8,494,787BOYAmt
EOY$5,365,559EOYAmt

Accounts Payable Accr Expnss AccountsPayableAccrExpnssGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$943,655BOYAmt
EOY$2,301,980EOYAmt

Deferred Revenue DeferredRevenueGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$6,607,264BOYAmt
EOY$2,485,058EOYAmt

Loans From Officers Directors LoansFromOfficersDirectorsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$12,403BOYAmt
EOY$0EOYAmt

Other Liabilities OtherLiabilitiesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$38,044BOYAmt
EOY$7,301EOYAmt

Total Liabilities TotalLiabilitiesGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$7,601,366BOYAmt
EOY$4,794,339EOYAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Organization Follows SFAS117Yes (X)OrganizationFollowsSFAS117Ind

Unrestricted Net Assets UnrestrictedNetAssetsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$883,421BOYAmt
EOY$561,220EOYAmt

Permanently Rstr Net Assets PermanentlyRstrNetAssetsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$10,000BOYAmt
EOY$10,000EOYAmt

Total Net Assets Fund Balance TotalNetAssetsFundBalanceGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$893,421BOYAmt
EOY$571,220EOYAmt

Tot Liab Net Assets Fund Balance TotLiabNetAssetsFundBalanceGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
BOY$8,494,787BOYAmt
EOY$5,365,559EOYAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Info In Schedule O Part XIYes (X)InfoInScheduleOPartXIInd
Reconcilation Revenue Expnss-$266,491ReconcilationRevenueExpnssAmt
Net Unrlzd Gains Losses Invst-$239NetUnrlzdGainsLossesInvstAmt
Other Changes In Net Assets-$55,471OtherChangesInNetAssetsAmt
Info In Schedule O Part XIIYes (X)InfoInScheduleOPartXIIInd
Method Of Accounting AccrualYes (X)MethodOfAccountingAccrualInd
Accountant Compile Or Review0AccountantCompileOrReviewInd
FS AuditedYes (1)FSAuditedInd

FS Audited Basis FSAuditedBasisGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Separate Basis Fincl StmtYes (X)SeparateBasisFinclStmtInd
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Audit CommitteeYes (1)AuditCommitteeInd
Federal Grant Audit RequiredYes (1)FederalGrantAuditRequiredInd
Federal Grant Audit PerformedYes (1)FederalGrantAuditPerformedInd

Schedule A IRS990ScheduleA

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
HospitalYes (X)HospitalInd

Schedule B IRS990ScheduleB

Contributor Information ContributorInformationGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
ContributorRESTRICTEDContributorNum

Contributor Business Name ContributorBusinessName

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1RESTRICTEDBusinessNameLine1

Contributor US Address ContributorUSAddress

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Address Line1RESTRICTEDAddressLine1
Address Line2RESTRICTEDAddressLine2
CityRESTRICTEDCity
StateRESTRICTEDState
ZIP CodeRESTRICTEDZIPCode
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total ContributionsRESTRICTEDTotalContributionsAmt

Schedule D IRS990ScheduleD

Equipment EquipmentGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Other Cost Or Other Basis$1,972,586OtherCostOrOtherBasisAmt
Depreciation$673,815DepreciationAmt
Book Value$1,298,771BookValueAmt

Other Land Buildings OtherLandBuildingsGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Other Cost Or Other Basis$87,800OtherCostOrOtherBasisAmt
Depreciation$4,390DepreciationAmt
Book Value$83,410BookValueAmt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Book Value Land Buildings$1,382,181TotalBookValueLandBuildingsAmt

Other Liabilities Org OtherLiabilitiesOrgGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
DescDUE TO THIRD PARTIESDesc
Amt$7,301Amt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Liability$7,301TotalLiabilityAmt
Footnote TextYes (X)FootnoteTextInd
Total Rev Etc Audited Fincl Stmt$7,756,481TotalRevEtcAuditedFinclStmtAmt
Net Unrealized Gains Invst-$239NetUnrealizedGainsInvstAmt
Revenue Not Reported-$239RevenueNotReportedAmt
Revenue Subtotal$7,756,720RevenueSubtotalAmt
Revenue Not Reported Fincl Stmt$0RevenueNotReportedFinclStmtAmt
Total Revenue Per Form990$7,756,720TotalRevenuePerForm990Amt
Tot Expns Etc Audited Fincl Stmt$8,023,211TotExpnsEtcAuditedFinclStmtAmt
Expenses Not Reported$0ExpensesNotReportedAmt
Expenses Subtotal$8,023,211ExpensesSubtotalAmt
Expenses Not Rpt Fincl Stmt$0ExpensesNotRptFinclStmtAmt
Total Expenses Per Form990$8,023,211TotalExpensesPerForm990Amt

Supplemental Information Detail SupplementalInformationDetail

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Form And Line ReferencePART X, LINE 2:FormAndLineReferenceDesc
ExplanationTHE FOUNDATION RECOGNIZES THE EFFECT OF INCOME TAX POSITIONS ONLY WHEN THEY ARE MORE LIKELY THAN NOT TO BE SUSTAINED. MANAGEMENT HAS DETERMINED THAT THE FOUNDATION HAD NO UNCERTAIN TAX POSITIONS THAT WOULD REQUIRE FINANCIAL STATEMENT RECOGNITION OR DISCLOSURE. THE FOUNDATION IS NO LONGER SUBJECT TO EXAMINATIONS BY THE APPLICABLE TAXING JURISDICTIONS FOR PERIODS PRIOR TO DECEMBER 31, 2012.ExplanationTxt

Schedule I IRS990ScheduleI

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Grant Records MaintainedYes (1)GrantRecordsMaintainedInd

Grants Other Asst To Indiv In US GrantsOtherAsstToIndivInUSGrp

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Grant TypeFELLOWSHIP AWARDGrantTypeTxt
Recipient2RecipientCnt
Cash Grant$20,000CashGrantAmt

Supplemental Information Detail SupplementalInformationDetail

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Form And Line ReferencePART I, LINE 2:FormAndLineReferenceDesc
ExplanationTHIS IS A 2-YEAR FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM WITH SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS MONITORED AND SUPERVISED BY BTF'S STAFF PSYCHOLOGIST. UPON SUCCESSFUL COMPLETION OF THE PROGRAM, THE CANDIDATE EARNS A SCHOLARSHIP. ALL FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM CANDIDATES HAVE GRADUATED COLLEGE AND COMMIT TO THE 2-YEAR PROGRAM BEFORE GOING TO MEDICAL SCHOOL OR OTHER POST GRAD PROGRAM. AROUND THE TIME OF COMPLETION, THE CANDIDATE INFORMS BTF OF HIS / HER CONTINUING EDUCATION PLANS. THE PERSON IS GIVEN THE OPTION OF TAKING THE AWARD IMMEDIATELY WHEN EARNED (NORMALLY IN CASES WHERE THE PERSON HAS ALREADY ENROLLED IN MEDICAL OR GRADUATE SCHOOL) OR, FOR THOSE WHO ARE NOT YET ENROLLED, DEFERRING PAYMENT UNTIL THEY ARE READY TO RETURN TO SCHOOL. IN ALL CASES, WE OFFER THE OPTION OF RECEIVING THE PAYMENT DIRECTLY OR HAVING IT PAID TO THE PERSON'S SCHOOL. THE INDIVIDUAL WHO COMPLETED THE PROGRAM IN 2015 ELECTED TO RECEIVE DIRECT PAYMENT. IN ALL CASES, THE RECIPIENT IS ADVISED THAT THE SCHOLARSHIP MAY BE USED ONLY FOR ALLOWABLE AND NECESSARY EXPENSES FOR THE QUALIFIED FULL-TIME STUDY.ExplanationTxt

Schedule J IRS990ScheduleJ

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Compensation CommitteeYes (X)CompensationCommitteeInd
Independent ConsultantYes (X)IndependentConsultantInd
Form990 Of Other OrganizationsYes (X)Form990OfOtherOrganizationsInd
Written Employment ContractYes (X)WrittenEmploymentContractInd
Compensation SurveyYes (X)CompensationSurveyInd
Board Or Committee ApprovalYes (X)BoardOrCommitteeApprovalInd
Severance Payment0SeverancePaymentInd
Supplemental Nonqual Rtr Plan0SupplementalNonqualRtrPlanInd
Equity Based Comp Arrngm0EquityBasedCompArrngmInd
Comp Based On Revenue Of Flng Org0CompBasedOnRevenueOfFlngOrgInd
Comp Bsd On Rev Related Orgs0CompBsdOnRevRelatedOrgsInd
Comp Bsd Net Earns Flng Org0CompBsdNetEarnsFlngOrgInd
Comp Bsd Net Earns Rltd Orgs0CompBsdNetEarnsRltdOrgsInd
Any Non Fixed Payments0AnyNonFixedPaymentsInd
Initial Contract Exception0InitialContractExceptionInd

Rltd Org Officer Trst Key Empl RltdOrgOfficerTrstKeyEmplGrp (2 entries)

TitleTitleTxtBase Compensation Filing OrgBaseCompensationFilingOrgAmtCompensation Based On Rltd OrgsCompensationBasedOnRltdOrgsAmtBonus Filing OrganizationBonusFilingOrganizationAmountBonus Related OrganizationsBonusRelatedOrganizationsAmtOther Compensation Filing OrgOtherCompensationFilingOrgAmtOther Compensation Rltd OrgsOtherCompensationRltdOrgsAmtDeferred Compensation Flng OrgDeferredCompensationFlngOrgAmtDeferred Comp Rltd OrgsDeferredCompRltdOrgsAmtNontaxable Benefits Filing OrgNontaxableBenefitsFilingOrgAmtNontaxable Benefits Rltd OrgsNontaxableBenefitsRltdOrgsAmtTotal Compensation Filing OrgTotalCompensationFilingOrgAmtTotal Compensation Rltd OrgsTotalCompensationRltdOrgsAmtComp Report Prior990 Filing OrgCompReportPrior990FilingOrgAmtComp Report Prior990 Rltd OrgsCompReportPrior990RltdOrgsAmt
JAMSHID GHAJAR MD PHD
PRESIDENT$365,719$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$5,811$0$371,530$0$0$0
KATHELEEN STEVENS
CFO$180,252$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$0$180,252$0$0$0

Schedule L IRS990ScheduleL

Loans Btwn Org Interested Prsn LoansBtwnOrgInterestedPrsnGrp

Business Name BusinessName

FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Business Name Line1SYNC-THINK INCBusinessNameLine1Txt
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Relationship With OrgMAJORITY OWNER OF SYNC THINK INC. IS FOUNDATION PRESIDENTRelationshipWithOrgTxt
Loan PurposeFOR USE OF OFFICE SPACE AND SUPPLIESLoanPurposeTxt
Loan From OrganizationYes (X)LoanFromOrganizationInd
Original Principal$12,403OriginalPrincipalAmt
Balance Due$15,703BalanceDueAmt
Default0DefaultInd
Board Or Committee Approval0BoardOrCommitteeApprovalInd
Written Agreement0WrittenAgreementInd
FieldValueIRS element (for citing)
Total Balance Due$15,703TotalBalanceDueAmt

Bus Tr Involve Interested Prsn BusTrInvolveInterestedPrsnGrp (2 entries)

Relationship DescriptionRelationshipDescriptionTxtTransactionTransactionAmtTransactionTransactionDescSharing Of RevenuesSharingOfRevenuesInd
NY NEUROSCIENCE ASSOCIATES PC
OWNER OF ORGANIZATION IS THE PRESIDENT OF FOUNDATION$245,497THE PRESIDENT OF THE FOUNDATION IS THE SOLE OWNER OF NYN. IN 2015, THE FOUNDATION PAID $245,497 TO NYN FOR THE PRESIDENT'S ROLE AS PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR FOR THE EYE-TRAC1, EYETRAC ADVANCE AND CONCUSSION DEFINITION PROJECTS. NO FORMAL WRITTEN AGREEMENT HAS BEEN EXECUTED.0
SYNC-THINK INC
MAJORITY OWNER OF SYNC THINK INC. IS FOUNDATION PRESIDENT$978,750IN 2015, THE FOUNDATION ENTERED INTO AN AGREEMENT WITH STI TO PURCHASE EYE GOGGLE EQUIPMENT AT A 25% DISCOUNT FOR $978,750.0

Schedule O IRS990ScheduleO

Supplemental Information Detail SupplementalInformationDetail (7 entries)

Form And Line ReferenceFormAndLineReferenceDescExplanationExplanationTxt
FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION A, LINE 2JAMSHID GHAJAR HAS A BUSINESS RELATIONSHIP WITH KATHLEEN STEVENS AND ALAN G. QUASHA.
FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 11BRAIN TRAUMA FOUNDATION, INC. HAS ITS FORM 990 PREPARED BY AN OUTSIDE ACCOUNTING FIRM AND HAVE ESTABLISHED THE FOLLOWING REVIEW PROCESS TO ENSURE THAT THE INFORMATION REPORTED IS COMPLETE AND ACCURATE. WHEN THE FORM 990 HAS BEEN PREPARED, REVIEWED BY MANAGEMENT AND IS READY TO BE FILED WITH THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE, IT IS ELECTRONICALLY SENT TO THE BOARD MEMBERS OF THE ORGANIZATION FOR ANY COMMENTS. ANY COMMENTS ARE THEN GROUPED, SUMMARIZED AND PROVIDED TO THE OUTSIDE ACCOUNTANTS. EACH ISSUE IS DOCUMENTED AND ADDRESSED UNTIL THE RETURN IS FINALIZED AND APPROVED FOR FILING.
FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 12CTHE BOARD CHAIR INQUIRES AT ALL QUARTERLY MEETINGS WHETHER ANY UPDATES ARE REQUIRED TO THE CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENTS. ALSO, KEY EMPLOYEES ARE REQUIRED TO UPDATE THEIR CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENTS DURING THEIR ANNUAL REVIEW. CONFLICTS AND/OR POTENTIAL CONFLICTS ARE DISCLOSED, DISCUSSED AND RESOLVED AT BOARD MEETINGS AND NOTED IN THE MINUTES. FOLLOW UP IS CONDUCTED AT FUTURE MEETINGS IF DEEMED NECESSARY. ALL BOARD MEMBERS MUST SUBMIT CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENTS EACH YEAR. THE LAST TIME THIS WAS COMPLETED WAS NOVEMBER 9, 2015. WHEN A CONFLICT OR POTENTIAL CONFLICT ARISES, IT IS NORMALLY INTRODUCED AT A BOARD MEETING. BETWEEN MEETINGS, THE "CONFLICTED" PERSON NOTIFIES OTHER BOARD MEMBERS SO THAT THE ISSUE CAN BE ADDRESSED, AND THE BOARD SECRETARY MAY REFER THE MATTER TO LEGAL COUNSEL. WHEN A CONFLICT IS INTRODUCED FOR BOARD DISCUSSION, THE NATURE OF THE CONFLICT IS DEFINED, THE BOARD DETERMINES WHETHER OR NOT IT IS AN ACCEPTABLE CONFLICT, AND AN AGREEMENT IS REACHED CONCERNING HOW THE CONFLICT SHOULD BE MANAGED OR RESOLVED. DISCUSSION IS DULY NOTED IN THE MINUTES (INCLUDING THE BASIS FOR ACCEPTING THE CONFLICT); LEGAL OPINIONS ARE SOLICITED IF NEEDED; AND THE CONFLICT AND THE HANDLING OF THE CONFLICT ARE REVISITED AT YEAR-END.
FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION B, LINE 15ATHE PRESIDENTS COMPENSATION IS REVIEWED AND APPROVED ANNUALLY BY THE BOARD OF DIRECTORS COMPENSATION COMMITTEE. HIS COMPENSATION PACKAGE INCLUDES SALARY, STANDARD COMPANY-PAID BENEFITS, AND A FEE PAID TO HIS PC (NEW YORK NEUROSCIENCE ASSOCIATE) FOR PROGRAM RELATED SERVICES, ALL OF WHICH ARE SUBJECT TO REVIEW AND APPROVAL. THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE REVIEWS THE COMPENSATION PACKAGE AND MAKES A REOMMENDATION FOR APPROVAL OF THE BOARD. THE EXECUTIVE BOARD THEN VOTES, AND APPROVAL IS DOCUMENTED IN THE MINUTES TO THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE MEETING. IN ADDITION, A FORMAL INDEPENDENT 3RD PARTY COMPENSATION STUDY WAS CONDUCTED IN 2014, AND WAS PRESENTED BY THE COMPENSATION COMMITTEE TO THE EXECUTIVE BOARD. THE BOARD APPROVED THE PRESIDENT'S COMPENSATION FOR 2014 AND 2015.
FORM 990, PART VI, SECTION C, LINE 19THE ORGANIZATION MAKES ITS FORM 990 AND FORM 1023 AVAILABLE FOR PUBLIC INSPECTION AS REQUIRED UNDER SECTION 6104 OF THE INTERNAL REVENUE CODE. THE RETURN IS POSTED ON GUIDESTAR.ORG AND OTHER SIMILAR TYPES OF WEBSITES. IN ADDITION, THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, CONFLICT OF INTEREST POLICY, ARTICLES OF INCORPORATION, FORM 990, FORM 1023, AND BY-LAWS ARE ALSO AVAILABLE UPON WRITTEN REQUEST OR BY CALLING THE ORGANIZATION DIRECTLY.
FORM 990, PART XI, LINE 9:LOSS ON DISPOSAL OF INVENTORY -55,471.
FORM 990, PART XII, LINE 2C:THE BRAIN TRAUMA FOUNDATION, INC. AUDIT COMMITTEE ASSUMES RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE OVERSIGHT OF THE AUDIT OF ITS FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SELECTION OF ITS INDEPENDENT AUDITOR. THE POLICY FOR SELECTION AND OVERSIGHT OF THE INDEPENDENT AUDITORS HAS NOT CHANGED SINCE LAST YEAR.

Comments

Anonymous: no account or email. Up to 2,000 characters, at most one link. Comments are checked automatically; some wait for review.